Demonstrating the deep institutionalisation of de facto responsible research and innovation (rri) in participatory market contexts: examples from Bolivia and the Netherlands
Our paper reprises the concept deep institutionalisation of responsible innovation considering why and how it matters to add the adjective ‘deep’. We distinguish de facto responsible research and innovation (rri) as the study of how actors frame and govern responsibility through existing practices (...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2024-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Responsible Innovation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23299460.2024.2316365 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841556083075710976 |
---|---|
author | Sally Randles Allison Loconto Marc Steen |
author_facet | Sally Randles Allison Loconto Marc Steen |
author_sort | Sally Randles |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Our paper reprises the concept deep institutionalisation of responsible innovation considering why and how it matters to add the adjective ‘deep’. We distinguish de facto responsible research and innovation (rri) as the study of how actors frame and govern responsibility through existing practices (‘in the wild’) and investigate how these practices become institutionalised. We present a diagnostic framework comprising four axes which facilitates the critical and reflexive empirical interrogation of deep institutionalisation (DI). Deploying the framework, the paper explores DI in two very different cases: an inter-organisational case of Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS) in Bolivia; and an intra-organisational case of societal engagement within TNO in the Netherlands. Controversially perhaps, we argue that normative features of responsibility are enacted, amplified and potentially institutionalised through markets. Both cases show how particular market features become recursively qualified through the four mutually reinforcing processes that comprise deep institutionalisation: (i) historical contingency; (ii) institutional amplification; (iii) systemic overflowing; and (iv)multi-level alignment. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-45eac1b46bda4b9994199cee13d8d8e9 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2329-9460 2329-9037 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Responsible Innovation |
spelling | doaj-art-45eac1b46bda4b9994199cee13d8d8e92025-01-07T13:48:20ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Responsible Innovation2329-94602329-90372024-12-0111110.1080/23299460.2024.2316365Demonstrating the deep institutionalisation of de facto responsible research and innovation (rri) in participatory market contexts: examples from Bolivia and the NetherlandsSally Randles0Allison Loconto1Marc Steen2Faculty of Business and Law of Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United KingdomFrench National Institute for Research on Agriculture, Food and Environment (INRAE), Paris, FranceSenior Research Scientist at TNO (The Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research), The Hague, the NetherlandsOur paper reprises the concept deep institutionalisation of responsible innovation considering why and how it matters to add the adjective ‘deep’. We distinguish de facto responsible research and innovation (rri) as the study of how actors frame and govern responsibility through existing practices (‘in the wild’) and investigate how these practices become institutionalised. We present a diagnostic framework comprising four axes which facilitates the critical and reflexive empirical interrogation of deep institutionalisation (DI). Deploying the framework, the paper explores DI in two very different cases: an inter-organisational case of Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS) in Bolivia; and an intra-organisational case of societal engagement within TNO in the Netherlands. Controversially perhaps, we argue that normative features of responsibility are enacted, amplified and potentially institutionalised through markets. Both cases show how particular market features become recursively qualified through the four mutually reinforcing processes that comprise deep institutionalisation: (i) historical contingency; (ii) institutional amplification; (iii) systemic overflowing; and (iv)multi-level alignment.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23299460.2024.2316365Deep institutionalisationde facto responsible research and innovation rriParticipatory societyMarketsTNOParticipatory guarantee systems |
spellingShingle | Sally Randles Allison Loconto Marc Steen Demonstrating the deep institutionalisation of de facto responsible research and innovation (rri) in participatory market contexts: examples from Bolivia and the Netherlands Journal of Responsible Innovation Deep institutionalisation de facto responsible research and innovation rri Participatory society Markets TNO Participatory guarantee systems |
title | Demonstrating the deep institutionalisation of de facto responsible research and innovation (rri) in participatory market contexts: examples from Bolivia and the Netherlands |
title_full | Demonstrating the deep institutionalisation of de facto responsible research and innovation (rri) in participatory market contexts: examples from Bolivia and the Netherlands |
title_fullStr | Demonstrating the deep institutionalisation of de facto responsible research and innovation (rri) in participatory market contexts: examples from Bolivia and the Netherlands |
title_full_unstemmed | Demonstrating the deep institutionalisation of de facto responsible research and innovation (rri) in participatory market contexts: examples from Bolivia and the Netherlands |
title_short | Demonstrating the deep institutionalisation of de facto responsible research and innovation (rri) in participatory market contexts: examples from Bolivia and the Netherlands |
title_sort | demonstrating the deep institutionalisation of de facto responsible research and innovation rri in participatory market contexts examples from bolivia and the netherlands |
topic | Deep institutionalisation de facto responsible research and innovation rri Participatory society Markets TNO Participatory guarantee systems |
url | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23299460.2024.2316365 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sallyrandles demonstratingthedeepinstitutionalisationofdefactoresponsibleresearchandinnovationrriinparticipatorymarketcontextsexamplesfromboliviaandthenetherlands AT allisonloconto demonstratingthedeepinstitutionalisationofdefactoresponsibleresearchandinnovationrriinparticipatorymarketcontextsexamplesfromboliviaandthenetherlands AT marcsteen demonstratingthedeepinstitutionalisationofdefactoresponsibleresearchandinnovationrriinparticipatorymarketcontextsexamplesfromboliviaandthenetherlands |