Comparison of the regional and general anesthesia as a risk factor of perioperative arrhythmia: a two-group observational study

Background. Regional anesthesia has become widely used in routine anesthesiology practice, it is considered a safer method of anesthesia in older patients and those with concomitant pathology. Nevertheless, both general and regional anesthesia have side effects on the cardiovascular system. The card...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N.M. Semenko, Iu.L. Kuchyn, K.Yu. Bielka, M.S. Frank
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Zaslavsky O.Yu. 2024-11-01
Series:Медицина неотложных состояний
Subjects:
Online Access:https://emergency.zaslavsky.com.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/1783
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841545042632638464
author N.M. Semenko
Iu.L. Kuchyn
K.Yu. Bielka
M.S. Frank
author_facet N.M. Semenko
Iu.L. Kuchyn
K.Yu. Bielka
M.S. Frank
author_sort N.M. Semenko
collection DOAJ
description Background. Regional anesthesia has become widely used in routine anesthesiology practice, it is considered a safer method of anesthesia in older patients and those with concomitant pathology. Nevertheless, both general and regional anesthesia have side effects on the cardiovascular system. The cardiotoxic effect of anesthesia in one way or another is present with any variant of anesthesia. One of the most transparent signs is rhythm alterations on the ECG. These changes can occur not only intraoperatively, but also in the early postoperative period, have an asymptomatic clinical course. But the presence of these signs can have a negative impact on the patient’s prognosis. That is why we performed daily Holter monitoring for patients undergoing trauma surgery. The purpose of the study was to compare regional and general anesthesia as a risk factor for perioperative rhythm disturbances. Materials and methods. It was a 2-group observational study that included 120 trauma patients undergoing surgery using general (group GA) or regional anesthesia (group RA). Postoperative Holter monitoring lasted 24 hours. Further analysis of the recording included the assessment of the presence of ischemic changes or extrasystoles. Results. The incidence of ST-depression episodes within 24 perioperative hours was 10 % in the GA group compared to 3 % in the RA group. In the GA group, the percentage of extrasystole was significantly higher compared to the RA group: 1.5 ± 2.1 % versus 0.7 ± 1.3 % (p = 0.0145). An increase in Qtd was significantly higher in the GA group 15 minutes after the start of anesthesia (51.31 ± 23.09) compared to the RA group (40.70 ± 19.97; p = 0.008). At the same time, QT dispersion was statistically significantly higher in the RA group 1 hour after the start of anesthesia compared to the GA group — 38.22 ± 12.30 versus 50.1 ± 19.5 (p = 0.04). The QT interval was significantly longer in the GA group 15 minutes after the start of anesthesia: 440.00 ± 33.09 versus 400.70 ± 23.18 in the RA group (p = 0.04). One hour after the start of anesthesia, QTt was longer in the RA group: 390.22 ± 23.60 versus 410.1 ± 30.1 in the GA group (p = 0.05). Conclusions. Regional anesthesia has less hemodynamic effects and is the method of choice in patients with cardiovascular comorbidity. However, given the risk of cardiotoxicity due to the resorptive effect of the local anesthetic, in older patients and with existing risk factors, it is crucial to account for the arrhythmogenic effects of local anesthetics and adjust the dosage accordingly.
format Article
id doaj-art-45a6d2953e9c4430adeb88f7845a79d0
institution Kabale University
issn 2224-0586
2307-1230
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher Zaslavsky O.Yu.
record_format Article
series Медицина неотложных состояний
spelling doaj-art-45a6d2953e9c4430adeb88f7845a79d02025-01-12T11:41:05ZengZaslavsky O.Yu.Медицина неотложных состояний2224-05862307-12302024-11-0120763263710.22141/2224-0586.20.7.2024.17831783Comparison of the regional and general anesthesia as a risk factor of perioperative arrhythmia: a two-group observational studyN.M. Semenko0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8235-386XIu.L. Kuchyn1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9667-1911K.Yu. Bielka2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1185-6835M.S. Frank3https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6693-1202Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, UkraineBogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, UkraineBogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, UkraineBogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, UkraineBackground. Regional anesthesia has become widely used in routine anesthesiology practice, it is considered a safer method of anesthesia in older patients and those with concomitant pathology. Nevertheless, both general and regional anesthesia have side effects on the cardiovascular system. The cardiotoxic effect of anesthesia in one way or another is present with any variant of anesthesia. One of the most transparent signs is rhythm alterations on the ECG. These changes can occur not only intraoperatively, but also in the early postoperative period, have an asymptomatic clinical course. But the presence of these signs can have a negative impact on the patient’s prognosis. That is why we performed daily Holter monitoring for patients undergoing trauma surgery. The purpose of the study was to compare regional and general anesthesia as a risk factor for perioperative rhythm disturbances. Materials and methods. It was a 2-group observational study that included 120 trauma patients undergoing surgery using general (group GA) or regional anesthesia (group RA). Postoperative Holter monitoring lasted 24 hours. Further analysis of the recording included the assessment of the presence of ischemic changes or extrasystoles. Results. The incidence of ST-depression episodes within 24 perioperative hours was 10 % in the GA group compared to 3 % in the RA group. In the GA group, the percentage of extrasystole was significantly higher compared to the RA group: 1.5 ± 2.1 % versus 0.7 ± 1.3 % (p = 0.0145). An increase in Qtd was significantly higher in the GA group 15 minutes after the start of anesthesia (51.31 ± 23.09) compared to the RA group (40.70 ± 19.97; p = 0.008). At the same time, QT dispersion was statistically significantly higher in the RA group 1 hour after the start of anesthesia compared to the GA group — 38.22 ± 12.30 versus 50.1 ± 19.5 (p = 0.04). The QT interval was significantly longer in the GA group 15 minutes after the start of anesthesia: 440.00 ± 33.09 versus 400.70 ± 23.18 in the RA group (p = 0.04). One hour after the start of anesthesia, QTt was longer in the RA group: 390.22 ± 23.60 versus 410.1 ± 30.1 in the GA group (p = 0.05). Conclusions. Regional anesthesia has less hemodynamic effects and is the method of choice in patients with cardiovascular comorbidity. However, given the risk of cardiotoxicity due to the resorptive effect of the local anesthetic, in older patients and with existing risk factors, it is crucial to account for the arrhythmogenic effects of local anesthetics and adjust the dosage accordingly.https://emergency.zaslavsky.com.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/1783regional anesthesia cardiac toxicityrhythm alterationsgeneral anesthesia
spellingShingle N.M. Semenko
Iu.L. Kuchyn
K.Yu. Bielka
M.S. Frank
Comparison of the regional and general anesthesia as a risk factor of perioperative arrhythmia: a two-group observational study
Медицина неотложных состояний
regional anesthesia
cardiac toxicity
rhythm alterations
general anesthesia
title Comparison of the regional and general anesthesia as a risk factor of perioperative arrhythmia: a two-group observational study
title_full Comparison of the regional and general anesthesia as a risk factor of perioperative arrhythmia: a two-group observational study
title_fullStr Comparison of the regional and general anesthesia as a risk factor of perioperative arrhythmia: a two-group observational study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the regional and general anesthesia as a risk factor of perioperative arrhythmia: a two-group observational study
title_short Comparison of the regional and general anesthesia as a risk factor of perioperative arrhythmia: a two-group observational study
title_sort comparison of the regional and general anesthesia as a risk factor of perioperative arrhythmia a two group observational study
topic regional anesthesia
cardiac toxicity
rhythm alterations
general anesthesia
url https://emergency.zaslavsky.com.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/1783
work_keys_str_mv AT nmsemenko comparisonoftheregionalandgeneralanesthesiaasariskfactorofperioperativearrhythmiaatwogroupobservationalstudy
AT iulkuchyn comparisonoftheregionalandgeneralanesthesiaasariskfactorofperioperativearrhythmiaatwogroupobservationalstudy
AT kyubielka comparisonoftheregionalandgeneralanesthesiaasariskfactorofperioperativearrhythmiaatwogroupobservationalstudy
AT msfrank comparisonoftheregionalandgeneralanesthesiaasariskfactorofperioperativearrhythmiaatwogroupobservationalstudy