How to Write a Systematic Review with Meta-analysis?

Systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses are considered to be the highest level of evidence. They attempt to synthesize the existing original research and provide a structured and comprehensive approach to evaluate the existing evidence on any given research question. This article attempts to prov...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sandeep Grover, Chandrima Naskar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-12-01
Series:International Journal of Advanced Medical and Health Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijamr.ijamr_263_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses are considered to be the highest level of evidence. They attempt to synthesize the existing original research and provide a structured and comprehensive approach to evaluate the existing evidence on any given research question. This article attempts to provide an overview of how a SR differs from other types of reviews and provides information on how to do a SR and meta-analysis. SRs differ from other types of reviews in terms of having a well-defined research question, systematic literature search, predefined eligibility criteria and outcomes, assessment of study quality, synthesis of findings, and, if possible, a meta-analysis. The different steps involved in carrying out a SR include defining the research question (by using the PICOT framework, i.e. population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timeframe), developing a protocol and registering the same, carrying out a comprehensive literature search, carefully selecting the studies, extracting the data, assessing the quality of the included studies, data synthesis, and interpretation of results. For meta-analysis, additional steps involve the calculation of effect sizes, choosing the appropriate model for analysis (fixed vs. random effects), preparation of forest plots, assessment of publication bias, and doing subgroup/sensitivity analyses.
ISSN:2349-4220
2350-0298