Which Upstream Solar Wind Conditions Matter Most in Predicting Bz Within Coronal Mass Ejections
Abstract Accurately predicting the z‐component of the interplanetary magnetic field, particularly during the passage of an interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME), is a crucial objective for space weather predictions. Currently, only a handful of techniques have been proposed and they remain lim...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2023-04-01
|
| Series: | Space Weather |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003327 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841536476813197312 |
|---|---|
| author | Pete Riley M. A. Reiss C. Möstl |
| author_facet | Pete Riley M. A. Reiss C. Möstl |
| author_sort | Pete Riley |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Accurately predicting the z‐component of the interplanetary magnetic field, particularly during the passage of an interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME), is a crucial objective for space weather predictions. Currently, only a handful of techniques have been proposed and they remain limited in scope and accuracy. Recently, a robust machine learning technique was developed for predicting the minimum value of Bz within ICMEs based on a set of 42 “features,” that is, variables calculated from measured quantities upstream of the ICME and within its sheath region. In this study, we investigate these so‐called explanatory variables in more detail, focusing on those that were (a) statistically significant and (b) most important. We find that number density and magnetic field strength accounted for a large proportion of the variability. These features capture the degree to which the ICME compresses the ambient solar wind ahead. Intuitively, this makes sense: Energy made available to coronal mass ejections (CMEs) as they erupt is partitioned into magnetic and kinetic energy. Thus, more powerful CMEs are launched with larger flux‐rope fields (larger Bz), at greater speeds, resulting in more sheath compression (increased number density and total field strength). |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-43bde20ae4cb4b1aa5b5cfdc68bfcb9a |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1542-7390 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-04-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Space Weather |
| spelling | doaj-art-43bde20ae4cb4b1aa5b5cfdc68bfcb9a2025-01-14T16:26:47ZengWileySpace Weather1542-73902023-04-01214n/an/a10.1029/2022SW003327Which Upstream Solar Wind Conditions Matter Most in Predicting Bz Within Coronal Mass EjectionsPete Riley0M. A. Reiss1C. Möstl2Predictive Science Inc. San Diego CA USACommunity Coordinated Modeling Center Code 674, NASA GSFC Greenbelt MD USAAustrian Space Weather Office Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik Graz AustriaAbstract Accurately predicting the z‐component of the interplanetary magnetic field, particularly during the passage of an interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME), is a crucial objective for space weather predictions. Currently, only a handful of techniques have been proposed and they remain limited in scope and accuracy. Recently, a robust machine learning technique was developed for predicting the minimum value of Bz within ICMEs based on a set of 42 “features,” that is, variables calculated from measured quantities upstream of the ICME and within its sheath region. In this study, we investigate these so‐called explanatory variables in more detail, focusing on those that were (a) statistically significant and (b) most important. We find that number density and magnetic field strength accounted for a large proportion of the variability. These features capture the degree to which the ICME compresses the ambient solar wind ahead. Intuitively, this makes sense: Energy made available to coronal mass ejections (CMEs) as they erupt is partitioned into magnetic and kinetic energy. Thus, more powerful CMEs are launched with larger flux‐rope fields (larger Bz), at greater speeds, resulting in more sheath compression (increased number density and total field strength).https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003327 |
| spellingShingle | Pete Riley M. A. Reiss C. Möstl Which Upstream Solar Wind Conditions Matter Most in Predicting Bz Within Coronal Mass Ejections Space Weather |
| title | Which Upstream Solar Wind Conditions Matter Most in Predicting Bz Within Coronal Mass Ejections |
| title_full | Which Upstream Solar Wind Conditions Matter Most in Predicting Bz Within Coronal Mass Ejections |
| title_fullStr | Which Upstream Solar Wind Conditions Matter Most in Predicting Bz Within Coronal Mass Ejections |
| title_full_unstemmed | Which Upstream Solar Wind Conditions Matter Most in Predicting Bz Within Coronal Mass Ejections |
| title_short | Which Upstream Solar Wind Conditions Matter Most in Predicting Bz Within Coronal Mass Ejections |
| title_sort | which upstream solar wind conditions matter most in predicting bz within coronal mass ejections |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003327 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT peteriley whichupstreamsolarwindconditionsmattermostinpredictingbzwithincoronalmassejections AT mareiss whichupstreamsolarwindconditionsmattermostinpredictingbzwithincoronalmassejections AT cmostl whichupstreamsolarwindconditionsmattermostinpredictingbzwithincoronalmassejections |