Historiology; From Reconstruction to Deconstruction: A Critique on the Book Deconstruction of History

Manzello’s encounter with the nature of historical cognition and the quality of its achievement on the two epistemological horizons of modernism and postmodernism in the light of the three historical approaches of reconstructionism, constructivism, and deconstructionism in the transition from modern...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sayyed Abolfazl Razavi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS) 2021-09-01
Series:پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی
Subjects:
Online Access:https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_6929_4874421fda6c4de78996e3666f0a92e6.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841555307371692032
author Sayyed Abolfazl Razavi
author_facet Sayyed Abolfazl Razavi
author_sort Sayyed Abolfazl Razavi
collection DOAJ
description Manzello’s encounter with the nature of historical cognition and the quality of its achievement on the two epistemological horizons of modernism and postmodernism in the light of the three historical approaches of reconstructionism, constructivism, and deconstructionism in the transition from modernism to postmodernism, with the subtle difference between the two concepts of "historian" and the “history-researcher” is considered to be examined. The historian who lives in the discourse space of the realization of the historical subject, immersed in modern conditions, experiences and compels the resulting comprehension of history and creates historical documents. The “history-researcher” lives in the contemporary discourse space and thinks in accordance with the structural and discourse requirements of his time and communicates with history. The history-researcher, both in the sense of reconstruction-construction and in the sense of deconstruction, presents his narrative in the light of narration and passing through events. A detailed description of the above-mentioned three approaches is considered in Manzello's book entitled “Deconstruction of History”, which is examined in both negative and positive aspects.
format Article
id doaj-art-4369ea117dd048bdb667ea35170a68b1
institution Kabale University
issn 2383-1650
language fas
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)
record_format Article
series پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی
spelling doaj-art-4369ea117dd048bdb667ea35170a68b12025-01-08T05:42:16ZfasInstitute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی2383-16502021-09-01217275210.30465/crtls.2021.30051.17746929Historiology; From Reconstruction to Deconstruction: A Critique on the Book Deconstruction of HistorySayyed Abolfazl Razavi0Associate Professor in History, Kharazmi University, Tehran, IranManzello’s encounter with the nature of historical cognition and the quality of its achievement on the two epistemological horizons of modernism and postmodernism in the light of the three historical approaches of reconstructionism, constructivism, and deconstructionism in the transition from modernism to postmodernism, with the subtle difference between the two concepts of "historian" and the “history-researcher” is considered to be examined. The historian who lives in the discourse space of the realization of the historical subject, immersed in modern conditions, experiences and compels the resulting comprehension of history and creates historical documents. The “history-researcher” lives in the contemporary discourse space and thinks in accordance with the structural and discourse requirements of his time and communicates with history. The history-researcher, both in the sense of reconstruction-construction and in the sense of deconstruction, presents his narrative in the light of narration and passing through events. A detailed description of the above-mentioned three approaches is considered in Manzello's book entitled “Deconstruction of History”, which is examined in both negative and positive aspects.https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_6929_4874421fda6c4de78996e3666f0a92e6.pdfhistoryhistoriologynarrativereconstructionismconstructivismdeconstructionism
spellingShingle Sayyed Abolfazl Razavi
Historiology; From Reconstruction to Deconstruction: A Critique on the Book Deconstruction of History
پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی
history
historiology
narrative
reconstructionism
constructivism
deconstructionism
title Historiology; From Reconstruction to Deconstruction: A Critique on the Book Deconstruction of History
title_full Historiology; From Reconstruction to Deconstruction: A Critique on the Book Deconstruction of History
title_fullStr Historiology; From Reconstruction to Deconstruction: A Critique on the Book Deconstruction of History
title_full_unstemmed Historiology; From Reconstruction to Deconstruction: A Critique on the Book Deconstruction of History
title_short Historiology; From Reconstruction to Deconstruction: A Critique on the Book Deconstruction of History
title_sort historiology from reconstruction to deconstruction a critique on the book deconstruction of history
topic history
historiology
narrative
reconstructionism
constructivism
deconstructionism
url https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_6929_4874421fda6c4de78996e3666f0a92e6.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sayyedabolfazlrazavi historiologyfromreconstructiontodeconstructionacritiqueonthebookdeconstructionofhistory