Comparative Analysis of the Efficiency, Safety, Predictability of Wavefront-Guided and Conventional FemtoLASIK Procedures in Low to Moderate Myopia

Purpose: to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and predictability of the wavefront-guided FemtoLASIK using the Platoscan computer program and data from the KR-1W aberrometer, in comparison with the conventional algorithm FemtoLASIK in patients with low to moderate myopia.Patients and methods. There...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. V. Doga, I. A. Mushkova, A. N. Karimova, E. V. Kechin, A. G. Guliev, V. G. Lee
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Ophthalmology Publishing Group 2018-07-01
Series:Oftalʹmologiâ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ophthalmojournal.com/opht/article/view/648
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849240940972081152
author A. V. Doga
I. A. Mushkova
A. N. Karimova
E. V. Kechin
A. G. Guliev
V. G. Lee
author_facet A. V. Doga
I. A. Mushkova
A. N. Karimova
E. V. Kechin
A. G. Guliev
V. G. Lee
author_sort A. V. Doga
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and predictability of the wavefront-guided FemtoLASIK using the Platoscan computer program and data from the KR-1W aberrometer, in comparison with the conventional algorithm FemtoLASIK in patients with low to moderate myopia.Patients and methods. There were 62 eyes of 62 patients with low to moderate myopia who had undergone FemtoLASIK procedure using an excimer laser ‘Microscan Visum” (Russia) and a femtosecond laser Femto LDV Z6 (Switzerland) in the study. In the “Wavefront” group which included 31 eyes with a mean spherical equivalent (SE) -=3,32 ± 1,23 D (M ± SD) was performed a wavefront-guided Femtosecond LASIK using aberrometer KR-1W (Japan) and a program for calculating the operation’s parameters “Platoscan” (Russia). “Standard” group included 31 eyes with an average SE –3.51 ± 1.21 D (M ± SD), who received the conventional FemtoLASIK. The “Wavefront” and “Standard” groups were comparable in terms of pre-operative data (age, sex, corneal curvature, central thickness of the cornea, sphere, cylinder, SE) (p > 0.05). All patients underwent complete ophthalmological examination before refractive laser surgery, and also patients were examined on the 1st day and 1 month after FemtoLASIK.Results. One month postoperatively, in the “Wavefront” group the UDVA 1.0 or better (20/20 or better by Snellen) was achieved in 93.5%, in the “Standard” group — in 96,8% (p > 0.05). There wasn’t observed a loss of the CDVA lines in both groups. In the “Wavefront” group, gain of one or more lines of the CDVA was in 38.7%, in the “Standard” group — in 12.9% (p = 0.04, Fisher’s exact test). In the “Wavefront” group the predictability of targeted refraction within ±0.5 D was in 93.5%, within ±1.0 D — in 100%, in the “Standard” group — in 90,3 and 100%, respectively (p > 0.05). The efficiency index in the “Wavefront” group was 1.00 (1.00; 1.20) (Me (Q25; Q75)), in the “Standard” group — 1.00 (1.00; 1,00) (Me (Q25; Q75)) (p > 0.05). The safety index in the “Wavefront” group was 1.00 (1.00; 1.20) (Me (Q25; Q75)), in the “Standard” group — 1.00 (1.00; 1,00) (Me (Q25; Q75)) (p > 0.05).Conclusions. The FemtoLASIK procedure, performed according to the conventional and wavefront-guided algorithms using the “Platoscan” computer program and data from the KR-1W aberrometer, is an effective, safe and predictable method for correcting low to moderate myopia, there is no statistically significant difference between two algorithms (p > 0.05).
format Article
id doaj-art-435a4f1fedf64a79a22f48c6c2fd5694
institution Kabale University
issn 1816-5095
2500-0845
language Russian
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher Ophthalmology Publishing Group
record_format Article
series Oftalʹmologiâ
spelling doaj-art-435a4f1fedf64a79a22f48c6c2fd56942025-08-20T04:00:20ZrusOphthalmology Publishing GroupOftalʹmologiâ1816-50952500-08452018-07-01152S18919610.18008/1816-5095-2018-2S-189-196433Comparative Analysis of the Efficiency, Safety, Predictability of Wavefront-Guided and Conventional FemtoLASIK Procedures in Low to Moderate MyopiaA. V. Doga0I. A. Mushkova1A. N. Karimova2E. V. Kechin3A. G. Guliev4V. G. Lee5S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State InstitutionS. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State InstitutionS. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State InstitutionS. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State InstitutionS. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State InstitutionS. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State InstitutionPurpose: to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and predictability of the wavefront-guided FemtoLASIK using the Platoscan computer program and data from the KR-1W aberrometer, in comparison with the conventional algorithm FemtoLASIK in patients with low to moderate myopia.Patients and methods. There were 62 eyes of 62 patients with low to moderate myopia who had undergone FemtoLASIK procedure using an excimer laser ‘Microscan Visum” (Russia) and a femtosecond laser Femto LDV Z6 (Switzerland) in the study. In the “Wavefront” group which included 31 eyes with a mean spherical equivalent (SE) -=3,32 ± 1,23 D (M ± SD) was performed a wavefront-guided Femtosecond LASIK using aberrometer KR-1W (Japan) and a program for calculating the operation’s parameters “Platoscan” (Russia). “Standard” group included 31 eyes with an average SE –3.51 ± 1.21 D (M ± SD), who received the conventional FemtoLASIK. The “Wavefront” and “Standard” groups were comparable in terms of pre-operative data (age, sex, corneal curvature, central thickness of the cornea, sphere, cylinder, SE) (p > 0.05). All patients underwent complete ophthalmological examination before refractive laser surgery, and also patients were examined on the 1st day and 1 month after FemtoLASIK.Results. One month postoperatively, in the “Wavefront” group the UDVA 1.0 or better (20/20 or better by Snellen) was achieved in 93.5%, in the “Standard” group — in 96,8% (p > 0.05). There wasn’t observed a loss of the CDVA lines in both groups. In the “Wavefront” group, gain of one or more lines of the CDVA was in 38.7%, in the “Standard” group — in 12.9% (p = 0.04, Fisher’s exact test). In the “Wavefront” group the predictability of targeted refraction within ±0.5 D was in 93.5%, within ±1.0 D — in 100%, in the “Standard” group — in 90,3 and 100%, respectively (p > 0.05). The efficiency index in the “Wavefront” group was 1.00 (1.00; 1.20) (Me (Q25; Q75)), in the “Standard” group — 1.00 (1.00; 1,00) (Me (Q25; Q75)) (p > 0.05). The safety index in the “Wavefront” group was 1.00 (1.00; 1.20) (Me (Q25; Q75)), in the “Standard” group — 1.00 (1.00; 1,00) (Me (Q25; Q75)) (p > 0.05).Conclusions. The FemtoLASIK procedure, performed according to the conventional and wavefront-guided algorithms using the “Platoscan” computer program and data from the KR-1W aberrometer, is an effective, safe and predictable method for correcting low to moderate myopia, there is no statistically significant difference between two algorithms (p > 0.05).https://www.ophthalmojournal.com/opht/article/view/648femtolasikwavefront-guided“microscan visum”femto ldv z6aberrometerkr-1w“platoscan”
spellingShingle A. V. Doga
I. A. Mushkova
A. N. Karimova
E. V. Kechin
A. G. Guliev
V. G. Lee
Comparative Analysis of the Efficiency, Safety, Predictability of Wavefront-Guided and Conventional FemtoLASIK Procedures in Low to Moderate Myopia
Oftalʹmologiâ
femtolasik
wavefront-guided
“microscan visum”
femto ldv z6
aberrometer
kr-1w
“platoscan”
title Comparative Analysis of the Efficiency, Safety, Predictability of Wavefront-Guided and Conventional FemtoLASIK Procedures in Low to Moderate Myopia
title_full Comparative Analysis of the Efficiency, Safety, Predictability of Wavefront-Guided and Conventional FemtoLASIK Procedures in Low to Moderate Myopia
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of the Efficiency, Safety, Predictability of Wavefront-Guided and Conventional FemtoLASIK Procedures in Low to Moderate Myopia
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of the Efficiency, Safety, Predictability of Wavefront-Guided and Conventional FemtoLASIK Procedures in Low to Moderate Myopia
title_short Comparative Analysis of the Efficiency, Safety, Predictability of Wavefront-Guided and Conventional FemtoLASIK Procedures in Low to Moderate Myopia
title_sort comparative analysis of the efficiency safety predictability of wavefront guided and conventional femtolasik procedures in low to moderate myopia
topic femtolasik
wavefront-guided
“microscan visum”
femto ldv z6
aberrometer
kr-1w
“platoscan”
url https://www.ophthalmojournal.com/opht/article/view/648
work_keys_str_mv AT avdoga comparativeanalysisoftheefficiencysafetypredictabilityofwavefrontguidedandconventionalfemtolasikproceduresinlowtomoderatemyopia
AT iamushkova comparativeanalysisoftheefficiencysafetypredictabilityofwavefrontguidedandconventionalfemtolasikproceduresinlowtomoderatemyopia
AT ankarimova comparativeanalysisoftheefficiencysafetypredictabilityofwavefrontguidedandconventionalfemtolasikproceduresinlowtomoderatemyopia
AT evkechin comparativeanalysisoftheefficiencysafetypredictabilityofwavefrontguidedandconventionalfemtolasikproceduresinlowtomoderatemyopia
AT agguliev comparativeanalysisoftheefficiencysafetypredictabilityofwavefrontguidedandconventionalfemtolasikproceduresinlowtomoderatemyopia
AT vglee comparativeanalysisoftheefficiencysafetypredictabilityofwavefrontguidedandconventionalfemtolasikproceduresinlowtomoderatemyopia