Accountability and objectivity: Humanitarian narratives at the intersection of evidence and localisation
Abstract In the last decade, there has been a push for greater evidence-based practice within the humanitarian sector, alongside an increasing turn towards localising humanitarian assistance. Humanitarian actors and organisations have been increasing their production and use of evidence, while also...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SpringerOpen
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Journal of International Humanitarian Action |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-024-00160-x |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846100969246425088 |
|---|---|
| author | Ellen Turner Michelle Lokot Isabelle L. Lange Caitlin Wake Bayard Roberts |
| author_facet | Ellen Turner Michelle Lokot Isabelle L. Lange Caitlin Wake Bayard Roberts |
| author_sort | Ellen Turner |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract In the last decade, there has been a push for greater evidence-based practice within the humanitarian sector, alongside an increasing turn towards localising humanitarian assistance. Humanitarian actors and organisations have been increasing their production and use of evidence, while also being encouraged to reflect more critically on power hierarchies and decolonise humanitarian aid. This paper explores the intersection of these two narratives, examining how the use of evidence in humanitarian decision-making fits within a localisation agenda. Based on interviews with humanitarian health practitioners located globally, we examine how evidence is defined, and how it is used, including to inform both hierarchical and bottom-up approaches to decision-making. We find clear hierarchies about what counts as good evidence, with a weighting towards randomised-controlled trials, and that the perspectives of populations most affected by crises and the expertise of local actors were not routinely seen as central forms of evidence. Narratives about needing to build the capacity of local actors persist, alongside the notion of evidence as objective. We suggest that a disconnect exists between humanitarian discourses about evidence and localisation, arguing for the need to view evidence as political and influenced by researcher positionality This suggests that more consideration of locally-driven knowledge is needed and will strengthen humanitarian decision-making. We argue that a distinction between evidence and localisation does a disservice to both agendas and that finding synergies between these concepts would strengthen both. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-419faa09cae14121acb95eb16ab8d055 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2364-3404 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | SpringerOpen |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of International Humanitarian Action |
| spelling | doaj-art-419faa09cae14121acb95eb16ab8d0552024-12-29T12:41:28ZengSpringerOpenJournal of International Humanitarian Action2364-34042024-12-019111810.1186/s41018-024-00160-xAccountability and objectivity: Humanitarian narratives at the intersection of evidence and localisationEllen Turner0Michelle Lokot1Isabelle L. Lange2Caitlin Wake3Bayard Roberts4Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineHumanitarian Policy Group, Overseas Development InstituteFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineAbstract In the last decade, there has been a push for greater evidence-based practice within the humanitarian sector, alongside an increasing turn towards localising humanitarian assistance. Humanitarian actors and organisations have been increasing their production and use of evidence, while also being encouraged to reflect more critically on power hierarchies and decolonise humanitarian aid. This paper explores the intersection of these two narratives, examining how the use of evidence in humanitarian decision-making fits within a localisation agenda. Based on interviews with humanitarian health practitioners located globally, we examine how evidence is defined, and how it is used, including to inform both hierarchical and bottom-up approaches to decision-making. We find clear hierarchies about what counts as good evidence, with a weighting towards randomised-controlled trials, and that the perspectives of populations most affected by crises and the expertise of local actors were not routinely seen as central forms of evidence. Narratives about needing to build the capacity of local actors persist, alongside the notion of evidence as objective. We suggest that a disconnect exists between humanitarian discourses about evidence and localisation, arguing for the need to view evidence as political and influenced by researcher positionality This suggests that more consideration of locally-driven knowledge is needed and will strengthen humanitarian decision-making. We argue that a distinction between evidence and localisation does a disservice to both agendas and that finding synergies between these concepts would strengthen both.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-024-00160-xUse of evidenceLocalisationHumanitarian decision-making |
| spellingShingle | Ellen Turner Michelle Lokot Isabelle L. Lange Caitlin Wake Bayard Roberts Accountability and objectivity: Humanitarian narratives at the intersection of evidence and localisation Journal of International Humanitarian Action Use of evidence Localisation Humanitarian decision-making |
| title | Accountability and objectivity: Humanitarian narratives at the intersection of evidence and localisation |
| title_full | Accountability and objectivity: Humanitarian narratives at the intersection of evidence and localisation |
| title_fullStr | Accountability and objectivity: Humanitarian narratives at the intersection of evidence and localisation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Accountability and objectivity: Humanitarian narratives at the intersection of evidence and localisation |
| title_short | Accountability and objectivity: Humanitarian narratives at the intersection of evidence and localisation |
| title_sort | accountability and objectivity humanitarian narratives at the intersection of evidence and localisation |
| topic | Use of evidence Localisation Humanitarian decision-making |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-024-00160-x |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ellenturner accountabilityandobjectivityhumanitariannarrativesattheintersectionofevidenceandlocalisation AT michellelokot accountabilityandobjectivityhumanitariannarrativesattheintersectionofevidenceandlocalisation AT isabellellange accountabilityandobjectivityhumanitariannarrativesattheintersectionofevidenceandlocalisation AT caitlinwake accountabilityandobjectivityhumanitariannarrativesattheintersectionofevidenceandlocalisation AT bayardroberts accountabilityandobjectivityhumanitariannarrativesattheintersectionofevidenceandlocalisation |