THE ETHICS OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH (WITH PARTICULAR EMPHASIS ON EXERCISE AND MOVEMENT SCIENCE) (English translated version)
This paper reviews how we arrived at the current state of affairs in the ethical practice of scientific research, discussing some issues that are particularly pertinent to the exercise scientist. The paper focuses on two major areas of ethics in science. The ethical principles for biomedical researc...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universidad de Costa Rica
2015-12-01
|
| Series: | Pensar en Movimiento |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/pem/article/view/22716 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841563832913231872 |
|---|---|
| author | Luis Fernando Aragón-Vargas |
| author_facet | Luis Fernando Aragón-Vargas |
| author_sort | Luis Fernando Aragón-Vargas |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This paper reviews how we arrived at the current state of affairs in the ethical practice of scientific research, discussing some issues that are particularly pertinent to the exercise scientist. The paper focuses on two major areas of ethics in science. The ethical principles for biomedical research involving human subjects are presented and discussed using the three basic principles from the Belmont Report (autonomy, beneficence, and justice) as a guide. The ethical presentation and publication of data are discussed as an update or expanded comment on the ten topics covered by Roy Shephard in his Ethics in Exercise Science Research paper from 2002. The manuscript closes with a reflection on personal responsibility and its importance in every scientific endeavor: placing all responsibility for action on those scientists or physicians doing the experiments was not sufficient to prevent all types of human research abuses in the first half of the twentieth century. However, intricate and cumbersome external review and approval procedures generate the perception that the system should be more than enough to ensure good practices, a perception that may dangerously prevent the scientists from assuming their individual responsibility. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-3f5513e56b334974b396ba7ab0eb6906 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1409-0724 1659-4436 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2015-12-01 |
| publisher | Universidad de Costa Rica |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Pensar en Movimiento |
| spelling | doaj-art-3f5513e56b334974b396ba7ab0eb69062025-01-02T23:31:10ZengUniversidad de Costa RicaPensar en Movimiento1409-07241659-44362015-12-01132305410.15517/pensarmov.v13i2.2271620396THE ETHICS OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH (WITH PARTICULAR EMPHASIS ON EXERCISE AND MOVEMENT SCIENCE) (English translated version)Luis Fernando Aragón-Vargas0Human Movement Science Research Center University of Costa RicaThis paper reviews how we arrived at the current state of affairs in the ethical practice of scientific research, discussing some issues that are particularly pertinent to the exercise scientist. The paper focuses on two major areas of ethics in science. The ethical principles for biomedical research involving human subjects are presented and discussed using the three basic principles from the Belmont Report (autonomy, beneficence, and justice) as a guide. The ethical presentation and publication of data are discussed as an update or expanded comment on the ten topics covered by Roy Shephard in his Ethics in Exercise Science Research paper from 2002. The manuscript closes with a reflection on personal responsibility and its importance in every scientific endeavor: placing all responsibility for action on those scientists or physicians doing the experiments was not sufficient to prevent all types of human research abuses in the first half of the twentieth century. However, intricate and cumbersome external review and approval procedures generate the perception that the system should be more than enough to ensure good practices, a perception that may dangerously prevent the scientists from assuming their individual responsibility.http://www.revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/pem/article/view/22716publicationpeer reviewethics in sciencepersonal responsibility |
| spellingShingle | Luis Fernando Aragón-Vargas THE ETHICS OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH (WITH PARTICULAR EMPHASIS ON EXERCISE AND MOVEMENT SCIENCE) (English translated version) Pensar en Movimiento publication peer review ethics in science personal responsibility |
| title | THE ETHICS OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH (WITH PARTICULAR EMPHASIS ON EXERCISE AND MOVEMENT SCIENCE) (English translated version) |
| title_full | THE ETHICS OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH (WITH PARTICULAR EMPHASIS ON EXERCISE AND MOVEMENT SCIENCE) (English translated version) |
| title_fullStr | THE ETHICS OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH (WITH PARTICULAR EMPHASIS ON EXERCISE AND MOVEMENT SCIENCE) (English translated version) |
| title_full_unstemmed | THE ETHICS OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH (WITH PARTICULAR EMPHASIS ON EXERCISE AND MOVEMENT SCIENCE) (English translated version) |
| title_short | THE ETHICS OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH (WITH PARTICULAR EMPHASIS ON EXERCISE AND MOVEMENT SCIENCE) (English translated version) |
| title_sort | ethics of scientific research with particular emphasis on exercise and movement science english translated version |
| topic | publication peer review ethics in science personal responsibility |
| url | http://www.revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/pem/article/view/22716 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT luisfernandoaragonvargas theethicsofscientificresearchwithparticularemphasisonexerciseandmovementscienceenglishtranslatedversion AT luisfernandoaragonvargas ethicsofscientificresearchwithparticularemphasisonexerciseandmovementscienceenglishtranslatedversion |