Evaluation and Comparison of Accuracy of Complete Arch Digital and Conventional Implant Impression as Influenced by the Use of a 3D Printed Modular Splint –An In-Vitro Study
Aim: To investigate the accuracy of Complete Arch implant impression digitally and conventionally with and without using a 3D printed modular chain splint. Methods: The STROBE (strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology) guidelines were use to conduct an analytical cross-se...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1256_24 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841543453943529472 |
|---|---|
| author | Bhushan S. Pol Ajay V. Sabane Rajashree D. Jadhav Pankaj P. Kadam Arti R. Gachake Bhagyashree G. Kalsekar |
| author_facet | Bhushan S. Pol Ajay V. Sabane Rajashree D. Jadhav Pankaj P. Kadam Arti R. Gachake Bhagyashree G. Kalsekar |
| author_sort | Bhushan S. Pol |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Aim:
To investigate the accuracy of Complete Arch implant impression digitally and conventionally with and without using a 3D printed modular chain splint.
Methods:
The STROBE (strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology) guidelines were use to conduct an analytical cross-sectional study. The total number of samples (n = 40) was derived and was divided into two groups with four subgroups: A1-Digital Impression without splinting of scan bodies (reference scan) and A2-Digital Impression splinted with 3D printed Modular Chain splint (test scan) and B1-Conventional Impression without Splinting of impression copings (reference scan) and B2- Conventional Impression splinted with 3D printed modular chain splint (test scan). In total 40 sample STL files were superimposed. Each analogue were assessed with respect to X, Y and Z axes (X-longitudinal, Y-lateral, and Z-vertical). All the data analysis was performed with SPSS version 22.0 with P < 0.05 as statistical significance.
Results:
There was no significant difference in the mean standard deviation along the X-axis (P > 0.05). The mean standard deviation along with a Y-axis (P > 0.05) also showed no statistical difference whereas along with the Z-axis mean standard deviation (P > 0.05). Along the vertical Z-axis, there was a significant difference in the mean standard deviation in comparison with the horizontal X and Y axes.
Conclusions:
There is no significant difference in accuracy of complete arch implant impression when the intraoral digital impression was compared to the traditional impression with or without the use of 3D printed modular splint. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-3d80fdf5a88945c2b6f86c83b4f75a74 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0976-4879 0975-7406 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| spelling | doaj-art-3d80fdf5a88945c2b6f86c83b4f75a742025-01-13T10:25:04ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0976-48790975-74062024-12-0116Suppl 4S3764S376710.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1256_24Evaluation and Comparison of Accuracy of Complete Arch Digital and Conventional Implant Impression as Influenced by the Use of a 3D Printed Modular Splint –An In-Vitro StudyBhushan S. PolAjay V. SabaneRajashree D. JadhavPankaj P. KadamArti R. GachakeBhagyashree G. KalsekarAim: To investigate the accuracy of Complete Arch implant impression digitally and conventionally with and without using a 3D printed modular chain splint. Methods: The STROBE (strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology) guidelines were use to conduct an analytical cross-sectional study. The total number of samples (n = 40) was derived and was divided into two groups with four subgroups: A1-Digital Impression without splinting of scan bodies (reference scan) and A2-Digital Impression splinted with 3D printed Modular Chain splint (test scan) and B1-Conventional Impression without Splinting of impression copings (reference scan) and B2- Conventional Impression splinted with 3D printed modular chain splint (test scan). In total 40 sample STL files were superimposed. Each analogue were assessed with respect to X, Y and Z axes (X-longitudinal, Y-lateral, and Z-vertical). All the data analysis was performed with SPSS version 22.0 with P < 0.05 as statistical significance. Results: There was no significant difference in the mean standard deviation along the X-axis (P > 0.05). The mean standard deviation along with a Y-axis (P > 0.05) also showed no statistical difference whereas along with the Z-axis mean standard deviation (P > 0.05). Along the vertical Z-axis, there was a significant difference in the mean standard deviation in comparison with the horizontal X and Y axes. Conclusions: There is no significant difference in accuracy of complete arch implant impression when the intraoral digital impression was compared to the traditional impression with or without the use of 3D printed modular splint.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1256_24digital impressionimplant impressionintraoral scanner |
| spellingShingle | Bhushan S. Pol Ajay V. Sabane Rajashree D. Jadhav Pankaj P. Kadam Arti R. Gachake Bhagyashree G. Kalsekar Evaluation and Comparison of Accuracy of Complete Arch Digital and Conventional Implant Impression as Influenced by the Use of a 3D Printed Modular Splint –An In-Vitro Study Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences digital impression implant impression intraoral scanner |
| title | Evaluation and Comparison of Accuracy of Complete Arch Digital and Conventional Implant Impression as Influenced by the Use of a 3D Printed Modular Splint –An In-Vitro Study |
| title_full | Evaluation and Comparison of Accuracy of Complete Arch Digital and Conventional Implant Impression as Influenced by the Use of a 3D Printed Modular Splint –An In-Vitro Study |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation and Comparison of Accuracy of Complete Arch Digital and Conventional Implant Impression as Influenced by the Use of a 3D Printed Modular Splint –An In-Vitro Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation and Comparison of Accuracy of Complete Arch Digital and Conventional Implant Impression as Influenced by the Use of a 3D Printed Modular Splint –An In-Vitro Study |
| title_short | Evaluation and Comparison of Accuracy of Complete Arch Digital and Conventional Implant Impression as Influenced by the Use of a 3D Printed Modular Splint –An In-Vitro Study |
| title_sort | evaluation and comparison of accuracy of complete arch digital and conventional implant impression as influenced by the use of a 3d printed modular splint an in vitro study |
| topic | digital impression implant impression intraoral scanner |
| url | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1256_24 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bhushanspol evaluationandcomparisonofaccuracyofcompletearchdigitalandconventionalimplantimpressionasinfluencedbytheuseofa3dprintedmodularsplintaninvitrostudy AT ajayvsabane evaluationandcomparisonofaccuracyofcompletearchdigitalandconventionalimplantimpressionasinfluencedbytheuseofa3dprintedmodularsplintaninvitrostudy AT rajashreedjadhav evaluationandcomparisonofaccuracyofcompletearchdigitalandconventionalimplantimpressionasinfluencedbytheuseofa3dprintedmodularsplintaninvitrostudy AT pankajpkadam evaluationandcomparisonofaccuracyofcompletearchdigitalandconventionalimplantimpressionasinfluencedbytheuseofa3dprintedmodularsplintaninvitrostudy AT artirgachake evaluationandcomparisonofaccuracyofcompletearchdigitalandconventionalimplantimpressionasinfluencedbytheuseofa3dprintedmodularsplintaninvitrostudy AT bhagyashreegkalsekar evaluationandcomparisonofaccuracyofcompletearchdigitalandconventionalimplantimpressionasinfluencedbytheuseofa3dprintedmodularsplintaninvitrostudy |