Modeling the 2023 Türkiye Earthquakes and Strain Accumulation Along the East Anatolian Fault Zone: Insights from InSAR, GNSS, and Small-Magnitude Seismicity, with Implications for the Seismic Potential at Rupture Terminations

The 6 February 2023 M<sub>W</sub> 7.8 and M<sub>W</sub> 7.6 earthquakes in southeastern Türkiye ruptured more than 400 km of the East Anatolian Fault Zone (EAFZ), producing one of the most destructive seismic sequences in recent history. Here, we integrate InSAR data, a new G...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniele Cheloni, Nicola Angelo Famiglietti, Aybige Akinci, Riccardo Caputo, Annamaria Vicari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-07-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/17/13/2270
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849320015298297856
author Daniele Cheloni
Nicola Angelo Famiglietti
Aybige Akinci
Riccardo Caputo
Annamaria Vicari
author_facet Daniele Cheloni
Nicola Angelo Famiglietti
Aybige Akinci
Riccardo Caputo
Annamaria Vicari
author_sort Daniele Cheloni
collection DOAJ
description The 6 February 2023 M<sub>W</sub> 7.8 and M<sub>W</sub> 7.6 earthquakes in southeastern Türkiye ruptured more than 400 km of the East Anatolian Fault Zone (EAFZ), producing one of the most destructive seismic sequences in recent history. Here, we integrate InSAR data, a new GNSS velocity field, and small-magnitude earthquakes to investigate the coseismic deformation, rupture geometry, and interseismic strain accumulation along the EAFZ. Using elastic dislocation modeling with a variable-strike, multi-segment fault geometry, we constrain the slip distribution of the mainshocks, showing improved fits to the surface displacement compared to the planar fault model. The M<sub>W</sub> 7.8 event ruptured a number of fault segments over ~300 km, while the M<sub>W</sub> 7.6 event activated a more localized fault system with a peak slip exceeding 15 m. We also model two moderate events (M<sub>W</sub> 5.6 in 2020 and M<sub>W</sub> 5.3 in 2022) along the southwestern part of the Pütürge segment—an area not ruptured during the 2020 or 2023 sequences. GNSS-derived strain-rate and locking depth estimates reveal strong interseismic coupling and significant strain accumulation in this region, suggesting the potential for a future large earthquake (M<sub>W</sub> 6.6–7.1). Similarly, the Hatay region, at the southwestern termination of the 2023 rupture, shows a persistent strain accumulation and complex fault interactions involving the Dead Sea Fault and the Cyprus Arc. Our results demonstrate the importance of combining remote sensing and geodetic data to constrain fault kinematics, evaluate rupture segmentation, and assess the seismic hazard in tectonically active regions. Targeted monitoring at rupture terminations—such as the Pütürge and Hatay sectors—may be crucial for anticipating future large-magnitude earthquakes.
format Article
id doaj-art-3cf1ab8379e94d9ab9047a0a917161b5
institution Kabale University
issn 2072-4292
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj-art-3cf1ab8379e94d9ab9047a0a917161b52025-08-20T03:50:16ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922025-07-011713227010.3390/rs17132270Modeling the 2023 Türkiye Earthquakes and Strain Accumulation Along the East Anatolian Fault Zone: Insights from InSAR, GNSS, and Small-Magnitude Seismicity, with Implications for the Seismic Potential at Rupture TerminationsDaniele Cheloni0Nicola Angelo Famiglietti1Aybige Akinci2Riccardo Caputo3Annamaria Vicari4Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Via di Vigna Murata 605, 00143 Rome, ItalyIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Irpinia, 83035 Grottaminarda, ItalyIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Via di Vigna Murata 605, 00143 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Physics & Earth Sciences, Ferrara University, 44121 Ferrara, ItalyIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Irpinia, 83035 Grottaminarda, ItalyThe 6 February 2023 M<sub>W</sub> 7.8 and M<sub>W</sub> 7.6 earthquakes in southeastern Türkiye ruptured more than 400 km of the East Anatolian Fault Zone (EAFZ), producing one of the most destructive seismic sequences in recent history. Here, we integrate InSAR data, a new GNSS velocity field, and small-magnitude earthquakes to investigate the coseismic deformation, rupture geometry, and interseismic strain accumulation along the EAFZ. Using elastic dislocation modeling with a variable-strike, multi-segment fault geometry, we constrain the slip distribution of the mainshocks, showing improved fits to the surface displacement compared to the planar fault model. The M<sub>W</sub> 7.8 event ruptured a number of fault segments over ~300 km, while the M<sub>W</sub> 7.6 event activated a more localized fault system with a peak slip exceeding 15 m. We also model two moderate events (M<sub>W</sub> 5.6 in 2020 and M<sub>W</sub> 5.3 in 2022) along the southwestern part of the Pütürge segment—an area not ruptured during the 2020 or 2023 sequences. GNSS-derived strain-rate and locking depth estimates reveal strong interseismic coupling and significant strain accumulation in this region, suggesting the potential for a future large earthquake (M<sub>W</sub> 6.6–7.1). Similarly, the Hatay region, at the southwestern termination of the 2023 rupture, shows a persistent strain accumulation and complex fault interactions involving the Dead Sea Fault and the Cyprus Arc. Our results demonstrate the importance of combining remote sensing and geodetic data to constrain fault kinematics, evaluate rupture segmentation, and assess the seismic hazard in tectonically active regions. Targeted monitoring at rupture terminations—such as the Pütürge and Hatay sectors—may be crucial for anticipating future large-magnitude earthquakes.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/17/13/2270source modelingInSARGNSSKahramanmaraş earthquakestrike-slip faultPütürge
spellingShingle Daniele Cheloni
Nicola Angelo Famiglietti
Aybige Akinci
Riccardo Caputo
Annamaria Vicari
Modeling the 2023 Türkiye Earthquakes and Strain Accumulation Along the East Anatolian Fault Zone: Insights from InSAR, GNSS, and Small-Magnitude Seismicity, with Implications for the Seismic Potential at Rupture Terminations
Remote Sensing
source modeling
InSAR
GNSS
Kahramanmaraş earthquake
strike-slip fault
Pütürge
title Modeling the 2023 Türkiye Earthquakes and Strain Accumulation Along the East Anatolian Fault Zone: Insights from InSAR, GNSS, and Small-Magnitude Seismicity, with Implications for the Seismic Potential at Rupture Terminations
title_full Modeling the 2023 Türkiye Earthquakes and Strain Accumulation Along the East Anatolian Fault Zone: Insights from InSAR, GNSS, and Small-Magnitude Seismicity, with Implications for the Seismic Potential at Rupture Terminations
title_fullStr Modeling the 2023 Türkiye Earthquakes and Strain Accumulation Along the East Anatolian Fault Zone: Insights from InSAR, GNSS, and Small-Magnitude Seismicity, with Implications for the Seismic Potential at Rupture Terminations
title_full_unstemmed Modeling the 2023 Türkiye Earthquakes and Strain Accumulation Along the East Anatolian Fault Zone: Insights from InSAR, GNSS, and Small-Magnitude Seismicity, with Implications for the Seismic Potential at Rupture Terminations
title_short Modeling the 2023 Türkiye Earthquakes and Strain Accumulation Along the East Anatolian Fault Zone: Insights from InSAR, GNSS, and Small-Magnitude Seismicity, with Implications for the Seismic Potential at Rupture Terminations
title_sort modeling the 2023 turkiye earthquakes and strain accumulation along the east anatolian fault zone insights from insar gnss and small magnitude seismicity with implications for the seismic potential at rupture terminations
topic source modeling
InSAR
GNSS
Kahramanmaraş earthquake
strike-slip fault
Pütürge
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/17/13/2270
work_keys_str_mv AT danielecheloni modelingthe2023turkiyeearthquakesandstrainaccumulationalongtheeastanatolianfaultzoneinsightsfrominsargnssandsmallmagnitudeseismicitywithimplicationsfortheseismicpotentialatruptureterminations
AT nicolaangelofamiglietti modelingthe2023turkiyeearthquakesandstrainaccumulationalongtheeastanatolianfaultzoneinsightsfrominsargnssandsmallmagnitudeseismicitywithimplicationsfortheseismicpotentialatruptureterminations
AT aybigeakinci modelingthe2023turkiyeearthquakesandstrainaccumulationalongtheeastanatolianfaultzoneinsightsfrominsargnssandsmallmagnitudeseismicitywithimplicationsfortheseismicpotentialatruptureterminations
AT riccardocaputo modelingthe2023turkiyeearthquakesandstrainaccumulationalongtheeastanatolianfaultzoneinsightsfrominsargnssandsmallmagnitudeseismicitywithimplicationsfortheseismicpotentialatruptureterminations
AT annamariavicari modelingthe2023turkiyeearthquakesandstrainaccumulationalongtheeastanatolianfaultzoneinsightsfrominsargnssandsmallmagnitudeseismicitywithimplicationsfortheseismicpotentialatruptureterminations