A case for characterizing declarative memory commission errors in healthy aging
Cognitive psychologists typically characterize declarative memory performance in terms of omission errors, or information that is not reported at test. At the same time, there tends to be much less attention paid to characterizing errors of commission, such as reporting non-studied items at test. Im...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Ariana Popoviciu, Lauren L. Richmond |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Cognition |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcogn.2024.1505492/full |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Implicit and Explicit False Memories conditioned by lapse of time
by: Andreea HOROIȚĂ, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Remembering what did not happen: the role of hypnosis in memory recall and false memories formation
by: Donato Giuseppe Leo, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
The recovery and retraction of memories of abuse: a scoping review
by: Henry Otgaar, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Emotion-Induced Memory Distortions: Insights from Deese-Roediger-McDermott and Misinformation Paradigms—A Comprehensive Review
by: Gunjan Joshi, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
Asking the right questions: interrogating the logic and assumptions of paradigms used to investigate interactions between procedural and declarative memory in category learning
by: Priya B. Kalra
Published: (2025-01-01)