Transcending Individual Traditions: Zhang Taiyan’s Interpretation of Zhuangzi’s Notion of <i>Chengxin</i>

This article examines the nuanced interpretations of <i>chengxin</i> 成心 in the <i>Zhuangzi</i> 莊子, a foundational Daoist text, across different philosophical traditions. Historically, Daoist thinkers like Guo Xiang 郭象 and Cheng Xuanying 成玄英, along with Neo-Confucian scholars...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cheng Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-10-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/11/1309
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846152555793481728
author Cheng Wang
author_facet Cheng Wang
author_sort Cheng Wang
collection DOAJ
description This article examines the nuanced interpretations of <i>chengxin</i> 成心 in the <i>Zhuangzi</i> 莊子, a foundational Daoist text, across different philosophical traditions. Historically, Daoist thinkers like Guo Xiang 郭象 and Cheng Xuanying 成玄英, along with Neo-Confucian scholars such as Lü Huiqing 吕惠卿 and Lin Xiyi 林希逸, have provided differing perspectives on the notion of <i>chengxin</i>. They regard it as either a source of subjective bias or an expression of heavenly principle. The core focus of this study is Zhang Taiyan’s 章太炎 innovative interpretation of <i>chengxin</i> as seeds (bijas) within ālaya-vijñāna (storehouse consciousness), integrating Yogācāra Buddhist concepts with traditional Daoist philosophy. The study conducts a textual analysis of Zhang’s <i>Qiwulun Shi</i> 齊物論釋, comparing his interpretation with earlier commentaries on the <i>Zhuangzi</i>. It is argued that Zhang’s approach is profoundly influenced by the Buddhist doctrine of non-duality, which underscores the interconnectedness of all phenomena. While Zhang’s interpretation has faced criticism from contemporaries and later philosophers for misunderstandings of Yogācāra theory and Kantian philosophy, it employs the method of <i>geyi</i> 格義 (matching concepts), not to impose one tradition over another, but to foster a dialogical process where the insights from each tradition mutually inform and transform one another. This article highlights the interpretative openness of the <i>Zhuangzi</i>, which invites diverse interpretations, and demonstrates how Zhang’s approach enriches this tradition by synthesizing various philosophical and religious frameworks. Zhang’s methodology remains relevant, fostering cross-cultural and inclusive philosophical dialog.
format Article
id doaj-art-3b53c35c896242daa2ec98a27eec97c9
institution Kabale University
issn 2077-1444
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Religions
spelling doaj-art-3b53c35c896242daa2ec98a27eec97c92024-11-26T18:19:14ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442024-10-011511130910.3390/rel15111309Transcending Individual Traditions: Zhang Taiyan’s Interpretation of Zhuangzi’s Notion of <i>Chengxin</i>Cheng Wang0Center for Studies of History of Chinese Language/Research Institute for Ancient Books, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, ChinaThis article examines the nuanced interpretations of <i>chengxin</i> 成心 in the <i>Zhuangzi</i> 莊子, a foundational Daoist text, across different philosophical traditions. Historically, Daoist thinkers like Guo Xiang 郭象 and Cheng Xuanying 成玄英, along with Neo-Confucian scholars such as Lü Huiqing 吕惠卿 and Lin Xiyi 林希逸, have provided differing perspectives on the notion of <i>chengxin</i>. They regard it as either a source of subjective bias or an expression of heavenly principle. The core focus of this study is Zhang Taiyan’s 章太炎 innovative interpretation of <i>chengxin</i> as seeds (bijas) within ālaya-vijñāna (storehouse consciousness), integrating Yogācāra Buddhist concepts with traditional Daoist philosophy. The study conducts a textual analysis of Zhang’s <i>Qiwulun Shi</i> 齊物論釋, comparing his interpretation with earlier commentaries on the <i>Zhuangzi</i>. It is argued that Zhang’s approach is profoundly influenced by the Buddhist doctrine of non-duality, which underscores the interconnectedness of all phenomena. While Zhang’s interpretation has faced criticism from contemporaries and later philosophers for misunderstandings of Yogācāra theory and Kantian philosophy, it employs the method of <i>geyi</i> 格義 (matching concepts), not to impose one tradition over another, but to foster a dialogical process where the insights from each tradition mutually inform and transform one another. This article highlights the interpretative openness of the <i>Zhuangzi</i>, which invites diverse interpretations, and demonstrates how Zhang’s approach enriches this tradition by synthesizing various philosophical and religious frameworks. Zhang’s methodology remains relevant, fostering cross-cultural and inclusive philosophical dialog.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/11/1309Zhuangzi<i>chengxin</i>YogācāraZhang Taiyaninterpretation
spellingShingle Cheng Wang
Transcending Individual Traditions: Zhang Taiyan’s Interpretation of Zhuangzi’s Notion of <i>Chengxin</i>
Religions
Zhuangzi
<i>chengxin</i>
Yogācāra
Zhang Taiyan
interpretation
title Transcending Individual Traditions: Zhang Taiyan’s Interpretation of Zhuangzi’s Notion of <i>Chengxin</i>
title_full Transcending Individual Traditions: Zhang Taiyan’s Interpretation of Zhuangzi’s Notion of <i>Chengxin</i>
title_fullStr Transcending Individual Traditions: Zhang Taiyan’s Interpretation of Zhuangzi’s Notion of <i>Chengxin</i>
title_full_unstemmed Transcending Individual Traditions: Zhang Taiyan’s Interpretation of Zhuangzi’s Notion of <i>Chengxin</i>
title_short Transcending Individual Traditions: Zhang Taiyan’s Interpretation of Zhuangzi’s Notion of <i>Chengxin</i>
title_sort transcending individual traditions zhang taiyan s interpretation of zhuangzi s notion of i chengxin i
topic Zhuangzi
<i>chengxin</i>
Yogācāra
Zhang Taiyan
interpretation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/11/1309
work_keys_str_mv AT chengwang transcendingindividualtraditionszhangtaiyansinterpretationofzhuangzisnotionofichengxini