Health Risk Assessment of Chemicals: From Bulk to Nano

Introduction: Workplaces often contain potential risks, such as exposure to toxic chemicals. Conducting a thorough health risk assessment helps employers recognize these dangers and implement necessary controls. In the 20th century, modern risk assessment frameworks began to be established with the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Soqrat Omari Shekaftik, Jamal Biganeh, Maedeh Hosseinzadeh, Hamidreza Jafari Nodoushan, Neda Mehrparvar
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2024-12-01
Series:بهداشت و ایمنی کار
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jhsw.tums.ac.ir/article-1-7091-en.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841558583783718912
author Soqrat Omari Shekaftik
Jamal Biganeh
Maedeh Hosseinzadeh
Hamidreza Jafari Nodoushan
Neda Mehrparvar
author_facet Soqrat Omari Shekaftik
Jamal Biganeh
Maedeh Hosseinzadeh
Hamidreza Jafari Nodoushan
Neda Mehrparvar
author_sort Soqrat Omari Shekaftik
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Workplaces often contain potential risks, such as exposure to toxic chemicals. Conducting a thorough health risk assessment helps employers recognize these dangers and implement necessary controls. In the 20th century, modern risk assessment frameworks began to be established with the rise of public health agencies. Material and Methods: The present study is a narrative review. In order to obtain necessary information, Persian and English texts were searched in Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, SID and Magiran databases. Keywords such as “health risk assessment”, “chemicals” and “nanomaterials” were used in this study. Results: Both quantitative and qualitative health risk assessments play critical roles in occupational health, with each method providing different levels of depth and accuracy depending on the situation. EPA Model, Monte-Carlo Simulation, Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) Models, Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA), Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA), and Biologically Based Dose-Response (BBDR) Models, are among the most important quantitative methods for assessing the health risk of chemicals. COSHH Model, ICCT Model, ICMM Model, Australian Model, and Romanian Model, are the most important qualitative methods for health risk assessment of chemicals. In addition to the quantitative and qualitative methods, semi-quantitative methods like Singapore Model, LEC Method, and SEP Model, have also been proposed for assessing the health risk of chemicals. The preference for qualitative over quantitative methods in the risk assessment of activities involving nanomaterials stems from substantial uncertainties, limited data availability, and the unique and complex behaviors of nanomaterials in the workplaces. Conclusion: Overall, the evolution of health risk assessment methods reflects a continuous drive towards greater accuracy, reliability, and relevance. As we continue to innovate and expand our knowledge, the field is well-positioned to address the complex and evolving landscape of chemical and material risks, ensuring the protection of human health and the environment.
format Article
id doaj-art-3aa6ed52c69f478caaa0833bb2aeeb70
institution Kabale University
issn 2251-807X
2383-2088
language fas
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series بهداشت و ایمنی کار
spelling doaj-art-3aa6ed52c69f478caaa0833bb2aeeb702025-01-06T08:45:26ZfasTehran University of Medical Sciencesبهداشت و ایمنی کار2251-807X2383-20882024-12-01144889915Health Risk Assessment of Chemicals: From Bulk to NanoSoqrat Omari Shekaftik0Jamal Biganeh1Maedeh Hosseinzadeh2Hamidreza Jafari Nodoushan3Neda Mehrparvar4 Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | Students’ Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | Environmental and Occupational Health Research Center, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran Department of occupational health, school of public health, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Introduction: Workplaces often contain potential risks, such as exposure to toxic chemicals. Conducting a thorough health risk assessment helps employers recognize these dangers and implement necessary controls. In the 20th century, modern risk assessment frameworks began to be established with the rise of public health agencies. Material and Methods: The present study is a narrative review. In order to obtain necessary information, Persian and English texts were searched in Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, SID and Magiran databases. Keywords such as “health risk assessment”, “chemicals” and “nanomaterials” were used in this study. Results: Both quantitative and qualitative health risk assessments play critical roles in occupational health, with each method providing different levels of depth and accuracy depending on the situation. EPA Model, Monte-Carlo Simulation, Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) Models, Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA), Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA), and Biologically Based Dose-Response (BBDR) Models, are among the most important quantitative methods for assessing the health risk of chemicals. COSHH Model, ICCT Model, ICMM Model, Australian Model, and Romanian Model, are the most important qualitative methods for health risk assessment of chemicals. In addition to the quantitative and qualitative methods, semi-quantitative methods like Singapore Model, LEC Method, and SEP Model, have also been proposed for assessing the health risk of chemicals. The preference for qualitative over quantitative methods in the risk assessment of activities involving nanomaterials stems from substantial uncertainties, limited data availability, and the unique and complex behaviors of nanomaterials in the workplaces. Conclusion: Overall, the evolution of health risk assessment methods reflects a continuous drive towards greater accuracy, reliability, and relevance. As we continue to innovate and expand our knowledge, the field is well-positioned to address the complex and evolving landscape of chemical and material risks, ensuring the protection of human health and the environment.http://jhsw.tums.ac.ir/article-1-7091-en.pdfhealth risk assessmentchemicalsnanomaterialscontrol bandingbulk
spellingShingle Soqrat Omari Shekaftik
Jamal Biganeh
Maedeh Hosseinzadeh
Hamidreza Jafari Nodoushan
Neda Mehrparvar
Health Risk Assessment of Chemicals: From Bulk to Nano
بهداشت و ایمنی کار
health risk assessment
chemicals
nanomaterials
control banding
bulk
title Health Risk Assessment of Chemicals: From Bulk to Nano
title_full Health Risk Assessment of Chemicals: From Bulk to Nano
title_fullStr Health Risk Assessment of Chemicals: From Bulk to Nano
title_full_unstemmed Health Risk Assessment of Chemicals: From Bulk to Nano
title_short Health Risk Assessment of Chemicals: From Bulk to Nano
title_sort health risk assessment of chemicals from bulk to nano
topic health risk assessment
chemicals
nanomaterials
control banding
bulk
url http://jhsw.tums.ac.ir/article-1-7091-en.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT soqratomarishekaftik healthriskassessmentofchemicalsfrombulktonano
AT jamalbiganeh healthriskassessmentofchemicalsfrombulktonano
AT maedehhosseinzadeh healthriskassessmentofchemicalsfrombulktonano
AT hamidrezajafarinodoushan healthriskassessmentofchemicalsfrombulktonano
AT nedamehrparvar healthriskassessmentofchemicalsfrombulktonano