Social welfare, interventionism, and indeterminacy: In defense of Rothbard
The present paper argues that Rothbard’s economic case against the state is more robust than suggested by his critics. The charge that it might be anemic is based on the suggestion that we can say literally nothing about the way governmental acts bear on social utility. Contra this supposition we su...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Igor Wysocki, Łukasz Dominiak |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Copernicus Center Press
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://zfn.edu.pl/index.php/zfn/article/view/604 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
A defense of Austrian welfare economics
by: Tate Fegley, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
praxeology of the value of life. A critique of Rothbard’s argument
by: Paweł Nowakowski
Published: (2024-12-01) -
What Rothbard could have done but did not do: The merits of Austrian economics without extreme apriorism
by: Alexander Linsbichler
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Demonstrated preference in the Austrian economic analysis
by: Dawid Megger
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Redesigning Local Welfare between Social Innovation and Multi-stakeholder Governance: The Case of the Municipality of Parma in Pandemic Times
by: Franca Maino, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01)