Can Carbon Sequestration in Tasmanian “Wet” Eucalypt Forests Be Used to Mitigate Climate Change? Forest Succession, the Buffering Effects of Soils, and Landscape Processes Must Be Taken into Account

Small areas of the wetter parts of southeast Australia including Tasmania support high-biomass “wet” eucalypt forests, including “mixed” forests consisting of mature eucalypts up to 100 m high with a rainforest understorey. In Tasmania, mixed forests transition to lower biomass rainforests over time...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter D. McIntosh, James L. Hardcastle, Tobias Klöffel, Martin Moroni, Talitha C. Santini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:International Journal of Forestry Research
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6509659
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849304834739535872
author Peter D. McIntosh
James L. Hardcastle
Tobias Klöffel
Martin Moroni
Talitha C. Santini
author_facet Peter D. McIntosh
James L. Hardcastle
Tobias Klöffel
Martin Moroni
Talitha C. Santini
author_sort Peter D. McIntosh
collection DOAJ
description Small areas of the wetter parts of southeast Australia including Tasmania support high-biomass “wet” eucalypt forests, including “mixed” forests consisting of mature eucalypts up to 100 m high with a rainforest understorey. In Tasmania, mixed forests transition to lower biomass rainforests over time. In the scientific and public debate on ways to mitigate climate change, these forests have received attention for their ability to store large amounts of carbon (C), but the contribution of soil C stocks to the total C in these two ecosystems has not been systematically researched, and consequently, the potential of wet eucalypt forests to serve as long-term C sinks is uncertain. This study compared soil C stocks to 1 m depth at paired sites under rainforest and mixed forests and found that there was no detectable difference of mean total soil C between the two forest types, and on average, both contained about 200 Mg·ha−1 of C. Some C in subsoil under rainforests is 3000 years old and retains a chemical signature of pyrogenic C, detectable in NMR spectra, indicating that soil C stocks are buffered against the effects of forest succession. The mean loss of C in biomass as mixed forests transition to rainforests is estimated to be about 260 Mg·ha−1 over a c. 400-year period, so the mature mixed forest ecosystem emits about 0.65 Mg·ha−1·yr−1 of C during its transition to rainforest. For this reason and because of the risk of forest fires, setting aside large areas of wet eucalypt forests as reserves in order to increase landscape C storage is not a sound strategy for long-term climate change mitigation. Maintaining a mosaic of managed native forests, including regenerating eucalypts, mixed forests, rainforests, and reserves, is likely to be the best strategy for maintaining landscape C stocks.
format Article
id doaj-art-3a43d4f8ceb04a2f9b73fb67c8bf6a52
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-9368
1687-9376
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Forestry Research
spelling doaj-art-3a43d4f8ceb04a2f9b73fb67c8bf6a522025-08-20T03:55:37ZengWileyInternational Journal of Forestry Research1687-93681687-93762020-01-01202010.1155/2020/65096596509659Can Carbon Sequestration in Tasmanian “Wet” Eucalypt Forests Be Used to Mitigate Climate Change? Forest Succession, the Buffering Effects of Soils, and Landscape Processes Must Be Taken into AccountPeter D. McIntosh0James L. Hardcastle1Tobias Klöffel2Martin Moroni3Talitha C. Santini4Forest Practices Authority, 30 Patrick Street, Hobart, TAS 7000, AustraliaSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, AustraliaResearch Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Technical University of Munich, Freising, GermanyPrivate Forests Tasmania, 30 Patrick Street, Hobart, TAS 7000, AustraliaUWA School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, AustraliaSmall areas of the wetter parts of southeast Australia including Tasmania support high-biomass “wet” eucalypt forests, including “mixed” forests consisting of mature eucalypts up to 100 m high with a rainforest understorey. In Tasmania, mixed forests transition to lower biomass rainforests over time. In the scientific and public debate on ways to mitigate climate change, these forests have received attention for their ability to store large amounts of carbon (C), but the contribution of soil C stocks to the total C in these two ecosystems has not been systematically researched, and consequently, the potential of wet eucalypt forests to serve as long-term C sinks is uncertain. This study compared soil C stocks to 1 m depth at paired sites under rainforest and mixed forests and found that there was no detectable difference of mean total soil C between the two forest types, and on average, both contained about 200 Mg·ha−1 of C. Some C in subsoil under rainforests is 3000 years old and retains a chemical signature of pyrogenic C, detectable in NMR spectra, indicating that soil C stocks are buffered against the effects of forest succession. The mean loss of C in biomass as mixed forests transition to rainforests is estimated to be about 260 Mg·ha−1 over a c. 400-year period, so the mature mixed forest ecosystem emits about 0.65 Mg·ha−1·yr−1 of C during its transition to rainforest. For this reason and because of the risk of forest fires, setting aside large areas of wet eucalypt forests as reserves in order to increase landscape C storage is not a sound strategy for long-term climate change mitigation. Maintaining a mosaic of managed native forests, including regenerating eucalypts, mixed forests, rainforests, and reserves, is likely to be the best strategy for maintaining landscape C stocks.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6509659
spellingShingle Peter D. McIntosh
James L. Hardcastle
Tobias Klöffel
Martin Moroni
Talitha C. Santini
Can Carbon Sequestration in Tasmanian “Wet” Eucalypt Forests Be Used to Mitigate Climate Change? Forest Succession, the Buffering Effects of Soils, and Landscape Processes Must Be Taken into Account
International Journal of Forestry Research
title Can Carbon Sequestration in Tasmanian “Wet” Eucalypt Forests Be Used to Mitigate Climate Change? Forest Succession, the Buffering Effects of Soils, and Landscape Processes Must Be Taken into Account
title_full Can Carbon Sequestration in Tasmanian “Wet” Eucalypt Forests Be Used to Mitigate Climate Change? Forest Succession, the Buffering Effects of Soils, and Landscape Processes Must Be Taken into Account
title_fullStr Can Carbon Sequestration in Tasmanian “Wet” Eucalypt Forests Be Used to Mitigate Climate Change? Forest Succession, the Buffering Effects of Soils, and Landscape Processes Must Be Taken into Account
title_full_unstemmed Can Carbon Sequestration in Tasmanian “Wet” Eucalypt Forests Be Used to Mitigate Climate Change? Forest Succession, the Buffering Effects of Soils, and Landscape Processes Must Be Taken into Account
title_short Can Carbon Sequestration in Tasmanian “Wet” Eucalypt Forests Be Used to Mitigate Climate Change? Forest Succession, the Buffering Effects of Soils, and Landscape Processes Must Be Taken into Account
title_sort can carbon sequestration in tasmanian wet eucalypt forests be used to mitigate climate change forest succession the buffering effects of soils and landscape processes must be taken into account
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6509659
work_keys_str_mv AT peterdmcintosh cancarbonsequestrationintasmanianweteucalyptforestsbeusedtomitigateclimatechangeforestsuccessionthebufferingeffectsofsoilsandlandscapeprocessesmustbetakenintoaccount
AT jameslhardcastle cancarbonsequestrationintasmanianweteucalyptforestsbeusedtomitigateclimatechangeforestsuccessionthebufferingeffectsofsoilsandlandscapeprocessesmustbetakenintoaccount
AT tobiaskloffel cancarbonsequestrationintasmanianweteucalyptforestsbeusedtomitigateclimatechangeforestsuccessionthebufferingeffectsofsoilsandlandscapeprocessesmustbetakenintoaccount
AT martinmoroni cancarbonsequestrationintasmanianweteucalyptforestsbeusedtomitigateclimatechangeforestsuccessionthebufferingeffectsofsoilsandlandscapeprocessesmustbetakenintoaccount
AT talithacsantini cancarbonsequestrationintasmanianweteucalyptforestsbeusedtomitigateclimatechangeforestsuccessionthebufferingeffectsofsoilsandlandscapeprocessesmustbetakenintoaccount