Quantitative relationships between elastic modulus of rod and biomechanical properties of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis

BackgroundCurrently, some novel rods with lower elastic modulus have the potential as alternatives to traditional titanium alloy rods in lumbar fusion. However, how the elastic modulus of the rod (rod-E) influences the biomechanical performance of lumbar interbody fusion remains unclear. This study...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jie Li, Zengfeng Du, Shuai Cao, Teng Lu, Zhongwei Sun, Hongyu Wei, Haopeng Li, Ting Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1510597/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841556707407298560
author Jie Li
Zengfeng Du
Shuai Cao
Teng Lu
Zhongwei Sun
Hongyu Wei
Haopeng Li
Ting Zhang
author_facet Jie Li
Zengfeng Du
Shuai Cao
Teng Lu
Zhongwei Sun
Hongyu Wei
Haopeng Li
Ting Zhang
author_sort Jie Li
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundCurrently, some novel rods with lower elastic modulus have the potential as alternatives to traditional titanium alloy rods in lumbar fusion. However, how the elastic modulus of the rod (rod-E) influences the biomechanical performance of lumbar interbody fusion remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the quantitative relationships between rod-E and the biomechanical performance of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).MethodsThe intact finite element model of L1-S1 was constructed and validated. Then 12 TLIF models with rods of different elastic moduli (ranging from 1 GPa to 110 GPa with an interval of 10 GPa) were developed. The range of motion (ROM) of the fixed segment, mean strain of the bone graft, and maximum von Mises stresses on the cage, endplate, and posterior fixation system models were calculated. Finally, regression analysis was performed to establish functional relationships between rod-E and these indexes.ResultsIncreasing rod-E decreased ROM of the fixed segment, mean strain of the bone grafts, and peak stresses on the cage and endplate, while increasing peak stress on the screw-rod system. When rod-E increased from 1 GPa to 10 GPa, ROM decreased by 10.4%–39.4%. Further increasing rod-E from 10 GPa to 110 GPa resulted in a 9.3%–17.4% reduction in ROM. The peak stresses on the posterior fixation system showed a nonlinear increase as the rod-E increased from 1 GPa to 110 GPa under most loading conditions. The R2 values for all fitting curves ranged from 0.76 to 1.00.ConclusionThe functional relationships between rod-E and the biomechanical properties of TLIF were constructed comprehensively. When the rod-E exceeds 10 GPa, further increases may not significantly improve stability, however, it may increase the risk of fixation failure. Therefore, a rod with an elastic modulus of approximately 10 GPa may provide optimal biomechanical properties for TLIF.
format Article
id doaj-art-39df5da962a24a78a13e07e353bfe6c4
institution Kabale University
issn 2296-4185
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
spelling doaj-art-39df5da962a24a78a13e07e353bfe6c42025-01-07T06:40:42ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology2296-41852025-01-011210.3389/fbioe.2024.15105971510597Quantitative relationships between elastic modulus of rod and biomechanical properties of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysisJie Li0Zengfeng Du1Shuai Cao2Teng Lu3Zhongwei Sun4Hongyu Wei5Haopeng Li6Ting Zhang7Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, ChinaDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Hospital of Yulin, Yulin, Shaanxi, ChinaDepartment of Orthopedics, Civil Aviation General Hospital, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, ChinaAnhui Polytechnic University, School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Wuhu, Anhui, ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, ChinaDepartment of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, ChinaBackgroundCurrently, some novel rods with lower elastic modulus have the potential as alternatives to traditional titanium alloy rods in lumbar fusion. However, how the elastic modulus of the rod (rod-E) influences the biomechanical performance of lumbar interbody fusion remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the quantitative relationships between rod-E and the biomechanical performance of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).MethodsThe intact finite element model of L1-S1 was constructed and validated. Then 12 TLIF models with rods of different elastic moduli (ranging from 1 GPa to 110 GPa with an interval of 10 GPa) were developed. The range of motion (ROM) of the fixed segment, mean strain of the bone graft, and maximum von Mises stresses on the cage, endplate, and posterior fixation system models were calculated. Finally, regression analysis was performed to establish functional relationships between rod-E and these indexes.ResultsIncreasing rod-E decreased ROM of the fixed segment, mean strain of the bone grafts, and peak stresses on the cage and endplate, while increasing peak stress on the screw-rod system. When rod-E increased from 1 GPa to 10 GPa, ROM decreased by 10.4%–39.4%. Further increasing rod-E from 10 GPa to 110 GPa resulted in a 9.3%–17.4% reduction in ROM. The peak stresses on the posterior fixation system showed a nonlinear increase as the rod-E increased from 1 GPa to 110 GPa under most loading conditions. The R2 values for all fitting curves ranged from 0.76 to 1.00.ConclusionThe functional relationships between rod-E and the biomechanical properties of TLIF were constructed comprehensively. When the rod-E exceeds 10 GPa, further increases may not significantly improve stability, however, it may increase the risk of fixation failure. Therefore, a rod with an elastic modulus of approximately 10 GPa may provide optimal biomechanical properties for TLIF.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1510597/fulltransforaminal lumbar interbody fusionconnecting rodelastic modulusfinite element analysisbiomechanical performance
spellingShingle Jie Li
Zengfeng Du
Shuai Cao
Teng Lu
Zhongwei Sun
Hongyu Wei
Haopeng Li
Ting Zhang
Quantitative relationships between elastic modulus of rod and biomechanical properties of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
connecting rod
elastic modulus
finite element analysis
biomechanical performance
title Quantitative relationships between elastic modulus of rod and biomechanical properties of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis
title_full Quantitative relationships between elastic modulus of rod and biomechanical properties of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis
title_fullStr Quantitative relationships between elastic modulus of rod and biomechanical properties of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative relationships between elastic modulus of rod and biomechanical properties of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis
title_short Quantitative relationships between elastic modulus of rod and biomechanical properties of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis
title_sort quantitative relationships between elastic modulus of rod and biomechanical properties of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion a finite element analysis
topic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
connecting rod
elastic modulus
finite element analysis
biomechanical performance
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1510597/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jieli quantitativerelationshipsbetweenelasticmodulusofrodandbiomechanicalpropertiesoftransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis
AT zengfengdu quantitativerelationshipsbetweenelasticmodulusofrodandbiomechanicalpropertiesoftransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis
AT shuaicao quantitativerelationshipsbetweenelasticmodulusofrodandbiomechanicalpropertiesoftransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis
AT tenglu quantitativerelationshipsbetweenelasticmodulusofrodandbiomechanicalpropertiesoftransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis
AT zhongweisun quantitativerelationshipsbetweenelasticmodulusofrodandbiomechanicalpropertiesoftransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis
AT hongyuwei quantitativerelationshipsbetweenelasticmodulusofrodandbiomechanicalpropertiesoftransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis
AT haopengli quantitativerelationshipsbetweenelasticmodulusofrodandbiomechanicalpropertiesoftransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis
AT tingzhang quantitativerelationshipsbetweenelasticmodulusofrodandbiomechanicalpropertiesoftransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis