Institutions and Incentives in Antitrust Enforcement
The United States Supreme Court has decided in a number of cases how Section One 1 of the Sherman Act should apply to agreements that potentially harm competition. In recent key cases, the Court stated that the rule of reason is the default rule in antitrust. Second, per se condemnation (or some re...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Spencer Weber Waller |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Católica Editora
2020-04-01
|
Series: | Market and Competition Law Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/7475 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Antitrust Private Enforcement and the Binding Effect of Public Enforcement Decisions
by: Miguel Sousa Ferro
Published: (2019-10-01) -
Antitrust Damage Claims: A View From Efta Court
by: Agata Jurkowska-Gomułka
Published: (2019-10-01) -
Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad for not Fulfilling Incentives for the Protection of Sustainable Food Agriculture Land
by: Riesta Yogahastama, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01) -
History of Antitrust Law in Japan
by: V. N. Shalaevskaya
Published: (2020-09-01) -
Patent portfolios and Patent Assertion Entities: antitrust issues and future perspective under the Unified Patent Court
by: Pietro Cappabianca
Published: (2024-06-01)