Efficacy of carbapenems versus alternative antimicrobials for treating complicated urinary tract infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) are associated with poor prognosis. The widespread infection of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative uropathogens such as extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing bacteria has limited the efficacy of antibiotics used for treating cUTI. Conside...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hisashi Noma, Takeshi Hasegawa, Erika Ota, Masayuki Maeda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/4/e069166.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846166256895393792
author Hisashi Noma
Takeshi Hasegawa
Erika Ota
Masayuki Maeda
author_facet Hisashi Noma
Takeshi Hasegawa
Erika Ota
Masayuki Maeda
author_sort Hisashi Noma
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) are associated with poor prognosis. The widespread infection of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative uropathogens such as extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing bacteria has limited the efficacy of antibiotics used for treating cUTI. Considering the existence of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) uropathogens, carbapenem is the last-resort antibiotic for cUTI. Given that carbapenem overuse has facilitated the spread of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, carbapenem dependence should be urgently reduced. However, improvement on the clinical outcomes of alternative antibiotics against cUTI caused by AMR uropathogens has not yet been systematically evaluated. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to explore and compare the clinical outcomes of cUTI caused by AMR uropathogens between carbapenem and non-carbapenem antibiotics.Methods and analysis The study inclusion criteria will be considered based on the PICO model consisting the following elements: population—adult patients with cUTIs caused by Gram-negative uropathogens; intervention—non-carbapenem class of antimicrobial agents with in vitro activities against Gram-negative uropathogens; comparison—treatment of carbapenem class antibiotics; outcome—a clinical and microbiological cure. Relevant articles published until December 2022 will be systematically searched in February 2023, using electronic databases such as PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE and ClinicalTrials.gov. Two independent reviewers will screen the select literature and then assess the full-text article to meet the inclusion criteria. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool. The treatment effects of antibiotics will be estimated as a risk ratio with a 95% CI, using the random-effects model.Ethics and dissemination This protocol and systematic review will not include direct patient data; thus, informed consent will be waived. The results of this study will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal for wider information dissemination.PROSPERO registration number CRD42022356064.
format Article
id doaj-art-38c37549d973479290b6e9d0b15d6aa1
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-38c37549d973479290b6e9d0b15d6aa12024-11-15T22:25:08ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552023-04-0113410.1136/bmjopen-2022-069166Efficacy of carbapenems versus alternative antimicrobials for treating complicated urinary tract infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysisHisashi Noma0Takeshi Hasegawa1Erika Ota2Masayuki Maeda3Department of Data Science, The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo, JapanShowa University Research Administration Center (SURAC), Graduate School of Medicine 1-5-8, Tokyo, JapanGlobal School of Nursing Science, Global Health Nursing, St. Luke’s International University, Chuo-ku, JapanDivision of Infection Control Sciences, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Showa University, Tokyo, JapanIntroduction Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) are associated with poor prognosis. The widespread infection of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative uropathogens such as extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing bacteria has limited the efficacy of antibiotics used for treating cUTI. Considering the existence of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) uropathogens, carbapenem is the last-resort antibiotic for cUTI. Given that carbapenem overuse has facilitated the spread of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, carbapenem dependence should be urgently reduced. However, improvement on the clinical outcomes of alternative antibiotics against cUTI caused by AMR uropathogens has not yet been systematically evaluated. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to explore and compare the clinical outcomes of cUTI caused by AMR uropathogens between carbapenem and non-carbapenem antibiotics.Methods and analysis The study inclusion criteria will be considered based on the PICO model consisting the following elements: population—adult patients with cUTIs caused by Gram-negative uropathogens; intervention—non-carbapenem class of antimicrobial agents with in vitro activities against Gram-negative uropathogens; comparison—treatment of carbapenem class antibiotics; outcome—a clinical and microbiological cure. Relevant articles published until December 2022 will be systematically searched in February 2023, using electronic databases such as PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE and ClinicalTrials.gov. Two independent reviewers will screen the select literature and then assess the full-text article to meet the inclusion criteria. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool. The treatment effects of antibiotics will be estimated as a risk ratio with a 95% CI, using the random-effects model.Ethics and dissemination This protocol and systematic review will not include direct patient data; thus, informed consent will be waived. The results of this study will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal for wider information dissemination.PROSPERO registration number CRD42022356064.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/4/e069166.full
spellingShingle Hisashi Noma
Takeshi Hasegawa
Erika Ota
Masayuki Maeda
Efficacy of carbapenems versus alternative antimicrobials for treating complicated urinary tract infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
BMJ Open
title Efficacy of carbapenems versus alternative antimicrobials for treating complicated urinary tract infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy of carbapenems versus alternative antimicrobials for treating complicated urinary tract infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of carbapenems versus alternative antimicrobials for treating complicated urinary tract infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of carbapenems versus alternative antimicrobials for treating complicated urinary tract infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy of carbapenems versus alternative antimicrobials for treating complicated urinary tract infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy of carbapenems versus alternative antimicrobials for treating complicated urinary tract infections caused by antimicrobial resistant gram negative bacteria protocol for a systematic review and meta analysis
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/4/e069166.full
work_keys_str_mv AT hisashinoma efficacyofcarbapenemsversusalternativeantimicrobialsfortreatingcomplicatedurinarytractinfectionscausedbyantimicrobialresistantgramnegativebacteriaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT takeshihasegawa efficacyofcarbapenemsversusalternativeantimicrobialsfortreatingcomplicatedurinarytractinfectionscausedbyantimicrobialresistantgramnegativebacteriaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT erikaota efficacyofcarbapenemsversusalternativeantimicrobialsfortreatingcomplicatedurinarytractinfectionscausedbyantimicrobialresistantgramnegativebacteriaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT masayukimaeda efficacyofcarbapenemsversusalternativeantimicrobialsfortreatingcomplicatedurinarytractinfectionscausedbyantimicrobialresistantgramnegativebacteriaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis