Differences in morphological characteristics, photosynthetic capacity and Chloroplast genomes reveal molecular markers to distinguish Angelica sinensis, A. acutiloba and A. gigas

Abstract Background The dried roots of Angelica sinensis, A. acutiloba, and A. gigas in the Angelica L. have been used as the same traditional medicines for nourishing the blood, regulating female menstrual disorders, relieving pains, and relaxing bowels for thousands of years. Although significant...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xia Li, Weihua Zhao, Yan Zhao, Mengfei Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-07-01
Series:BMC Plant Biology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-06987-9
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849344396414156800
author Xia Li
Weihua Zhao
Yan Zhao
Mengfei Li
author_facet Xia Li
Weihua Zhao
Yan Zhao
Mengfei Li
author_sort Xia Li
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The dried roots of Angelica sinensis, A. acutiloba, and A. gigas in the Angelica L. have been used as the same traditional medicines for nourishing the blood, regulating female menstrual disorders, relieving pains, and relaxing bowels for thousands of years. Although significant differences in geographical distribution, morphological characteristics, chemical components, and gene sizes have been observed in previous studies, they were limited to distinguishing the three species through an efficient, unique, and accurate approach. Results In this study, morphological characteristics, photosynthetic capacity, and chloroplast (CP) genomes of the three species were performed. There were obvious differences in morphological characteristics, such as leaf margin irregularly coarse-cuspidate-serrate of A. sinensis, leaf margin irregularly acute-serrate of A. acutiloba, and leaf margin irregularly coarse-toothed apex acute of A. gigas. There was a higher photosynthetic capacity of A. gigas and A. acutiloba than A. sinensis, which was consistent with root biomass. The length of CP genomes of A. sinensis, A. acutiloba and A. gigas were 141,869, 147,057 and 147,050 bp with encoding 124,128 and 128 genes, respectively. There were 3 genes (i.e., psbA, ndhB, and ycf15) affecting the expansion and contraction of inverted repeat (IR), and 7 genes (i.e., matK, psbN, ccsA, rps8, ndhF, ycf1, and ycf2) in the gene regions presenting notably high nucleotide diversity. Conclusion The distinct phenotypes of leaf shape and stem color can be used for species delimitation of the three species. The 3 genes (i.e., psbA, ndhB, and ycf15) can be used to distinguish A. sinensis from A. acutiloba and A. gigas using the agarose gel electrophoresis and the base sequence. The 7 genes (i.e., matK, psbN, ccsA, rps8, ndhF, ycf1, and ycf2) can accurately distinguish the three species using the base sequence. We establish a rapid and reliable multi-level identification system for the three Angelica species. This approach addresses critical challenges in medicinal plant taxonomy and supports quality control in herbal product industries.
format Article
id doaj-art-370636e6623f43b9adc94c04a51f9a1b
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2229
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Plant Biology
spelling doaj-art-370636e6623f43b9adc94c04a51f9a1b2025-08-20T03:42:40ZengBMCBMC Plant Biology1471-22292025-07-0125111610.1186/s12870-025-06987-9Differences in morphological characteristics, photosynthetic capacity and Chloroplast genomes reveal molecular markers to distinguish Angelica sinensis, A. acutiloba and A. gigasXia Li0Weihua Zhao1Yan Zhao2Mengfei Li3State Key Laboratory of Arid Land Crop Science, College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural UniversityState Key Laboratory of Arid Land Crop Science, College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural UniversityNational and Local Joint Engineering Research Center on Germplasms Innovation and Utilization of Chinese Medicinal Materials in Southwest China, Yunnan Agricultural UniversityState Key Laboratory of Arid Land Crop Science, College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural UniversityAbstract Background The dried roots of Angelica sinensis, A. acutiloba, and A. gigas in the Angelica L. have been used as the same traditional medicines for nourishing the blood, regulating female menstrual disorders, relieving pains, and relaxing bowels for thousands of years. Although significant differences in geographical distribution, morphological characteristics, chemical components, and gene sizes have been observed in previous studies, they were limited to distinguishing the three species through an efficient, unique, and accurate approach. Results In this study, morphological characteristics, photosynthetic capacity, and chloroplast (CP) genomes of the three species were performed. There were obvious differences in morphological characteristics, such as leaf margin irregularly coarse-cuspidate-serrate of A. sinensis, leaf margin irregularly acute-serrate of A. acutiloba, and leaf margin irregularly coarse-toothed apex acute of A. gigas. There was a higher photosynthetic capacity of A. gigas and A. acutiloba than A. sinensis, which was consistent with root biomass. The length of CP genomes of A. sinensis, A. acutiloba and A. gigas were 141,869, 147,057 and 147,050 bp with encoding 124,128 and 128 genes, respectively. There were 3 genes (i.e., psbA, ndhB, and ycf15) affecting the expansion and contraction of inverted repeat (IR), and 7 genes (i.e., matK, psbN, ccsA, rps8, ndhF, ycf1, and ycf2) in the gene regions presenting notably high nucleotide diversity. Conclusion The distinct phenotypes of leaf shape and stem color can be used for species delimitation of the three species. The 3 genes (i.e., psbA, ndhB, and ycf15) can be used to distinguish A. sinensis from A. acutiloba and A. gigas using the agarose gel electrophoresis and the base sequence. The 7 genes (i.e., matK, psbN, ccsA, rps8, ndhF, ycf1, and ycf2) can accurately distinguish the three species using the base sequence. We establish a rapid and reliable multi-level identification system for the three Angelica species. This approach addresses critical challenges in medicinal plant taxonomy and supports quality control in herbal product industries.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-06987-9Angelica sinensisAngelica acutilobaAngelica gigasMorphological characteristicsPhotosynthetic capacityChloroplast genome
spellingShingle Xia Li
Weihua Zhao
Yan Zhao
Mengfei Li
Differences in morphological characteristics, photosynthetic capacity and Chloroplast genomes reveal molecular markers to distinguish Angelica sinensis, A. acutiloba and A. gigas
BMC Plant Biology
Angelica sinensis
Angelica acutiloba
Angelica gigas
Morphological characteristics
Photosynthetic capacity
Chloroplast genome
title Differences in morphological characteristics, photosynthetic capacity and Chloroplast genomes reveal molecular markers to distinguish Angelica sinensis, A. acutiloba and A. gigas
title_full Differences in morphological characteristics, photosynthetic capacity and Chloroplast genomes reveal molecular markers to distinguish Angelica sinensis, A. acutiloba and A. gigas
title_fullStr Differences in morphological characteristics, photosynthetic capacity and Chloroplast genomes reveal molecular markers to distinguish Angelica sinensis, A. acutiloba and A. gigas
title_full_unstemmed Differences in morphological characteristics, photosynthetic capacity and Chloroplast genomes reveal molecular markers to distinguish Angelica sinensis, A. acutiloba and A. gigas
title_short Differences in morphological characteristics, photosynthetic capacity and Chloroplast genomes reveal molecular markers to distinguish Angelica sinensis, A. acutiloba and A. gigas
title_sort differences in morphological characteristics photosynthetic capacity and chloroplast genomes reveal molecular markers to distinguish angelica sinensis a acutiloba and a gigas
topic Angelica sinensis
Angelica acutiloba
Angelica gigas
Morphological characteristics
Photosynthetic capacity
Chloroplast genome
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-06987-9
work_keys_str_mv AT xiali differencesinmorphologicalcharacteristicsphotosyntheticcapacityandchloroplastgenomesrevealmolecularmarkerstodistinguishangelicasinensisaacutilobaandagigas
AT weihuazhao differencesinmorphologicalcharacteristicsphotosyntheticcapacityandchloroplastgenomesrevealmolecularmarkerstodistinguishangelicasinensisaacutilobaandagigas
AT yanzhao differencesinmorphologicalcharacteristicsphotosyntheticcapacityandchloroplastgenomesrevealmolecularmarkerstodistinguishangelicasinensisaacutilobaandagigas
AT mengfeili differencesinmorphologicalcharacteristicsphotosyntheticcapacityandchloroplastgenomesrevealmolecularmarkerstodistinguishangelicasinensisaacutilobaandagigas