Sustainable Design of a Tiny House: Using a Life Cycle Assessment Approach to Compare the Environmental Performance of Industrial and Earth-Based Building Systems
The increased concerns about climate change, diminishing natural resources, and environmental degradation call for deep research into new environmentally friendly building systems that use natural or recycled materials. The article presents an assessment of the environmental and climatic benefits as...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-02-01
|
| Series: | Buildings |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/15/3/491 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The increased concerns about climate change, diminishing natural resources, and environmental degradation call for deep research into new environmentally friendly building systems that use natural or recycled materials. The article presents an assessment of the environmental and climatic benefits associated with the construction of a tiny house made of <i>quincha</i>, a building system based on a wooden structure filled with locally sourced earth and straw. The tiny house is located in the Elqui Valley, in the Chilean region of Coquimbo, and it is designed to be compact, functional, comfortable, and efficient. The study uses a life cycle approach to assess the environmental impacts of building construction, maintenance, and end-of-life treatment, comparing the adopted <i>quincha</i> solution with four hypothetical scenarios using industrial, prefabricated, and/or synthetic construction materials currently adopted in the region. The thermal performance of all the analyzed solutions is also included in order to provide insights into the impact of the operational phase. This paper demonstrates that the <i>quincha</i> solution, in the face of lower thermal insulation compared to the other prefabricated solutions (the U-value of the <i>quincha</i> wall is 0.79 W/m<sup>2</sup>K while the U-value of the best prefabricated wall is 0.26 W/m<sup>2</sup>K), has higher thermal inertia (time lag (TL) and decrement factor (DF) are, respectively, 6.97 h and 0.60, while other systems have a TL below 4 h and DF higher than 0.81). For a quantitative environmental evaluation, the carbon footprint (global warming potential), water footprint, and embodied energy indicators are assessed through LCA, which takes into account the mass of the materials and their emission factors. The effectiveness of the <i>quincha</i> solution is also reflected in environmental terms; in fact, it is found to have the lowest carbon footprint (2635.47 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq) and embodied energy (42.7 GJ) and the second-lowest water footprint (2303.7 m<sup>3</sup>). Moreover, carbon sequestration values, which are assessed by estimating the carbon contained in building systems using wood and straw, demonstrate that the <i>quincha</i> tiny house is the only solution that can theoretically reach carbon neutrality (with its carbon storage value at −5670.21 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2075-5309 |