Ice cover loss and debris cover evolution in the Afghanistan Hindu Kush Himalaya between 2000 and 2020

Glaciers in Afghanistan are crucial elements for water resource and summer river flows. They are also threatened by rapid climate warming. This study presents an up-to-date assessment of ice cover loss for the entire country over two periods, 2000–2008 and 2008–2020, using newly developed remote sen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jamal A. N. Shokory, Stuart N. Lane
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2024-12-01
Series:Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/15230430.2024.2373858
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841543299226140672
author Jamal A. N. Shokory
Stuart N. Lane
author_facet Jamal A. N. Shokory
Stuart N. Lane
author_sort Jamal A. N. Shokory
collection DOAJ
description Glaciers in Afghanistan are crucial elements for water resource and summer river flows. They are also threatened by rapid climate warming. This study presents an up-to-date assessment of ice cover loss for the entire country over two periods, 2000–2008 and 2008–2020, using newly developed remote sensing indices that include a more reliable determination of changing debris cover. The results suggest an estimated ice-covered area of 2,690.7 ± 108.2 km2 in 2020, that was 75 ± 0.7% clean ice and 25 ± 3.0 percent debris-covered ice. Total ice-covered area retreated by −0.16 ± 0.01 percent yr−1 between 2000 and 2008 and −0.46 ± 0.05 percent yr−1 between 2008 and 2020. Notably, 60 percent of ice cover loss (2000–2020) related to ice cover extents with a size ≤ 2.5 km2, comprising 60 percent of the total ice-covered area in 2000. Higher altitude accumulation zones also exhibited mass loss. However, there was also substantial spatial variation in these rates of loss based on geographical region, glacier size, and climate zones. In the north-eastern regions that are geographically close to or part of the north-west Karakoram ice cover was declining at a substantially lower rate, stable, or even increasing slightly, as compared with the northern and central regions of Afghanistan.
format Article
id doaj-art-359315bdadc94928a4ec7801e5659146
institution Kabale University
issn 1523-0430
1938-4246
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research
spelling doaj-art-359315bdadc94928a4ec7801e56591462025-01-13T14:40:40ZengTaylor & Francis GroupArctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research1523-04301938-42462024-12-0156110.1080/15230430.2024.2373858Ice cover loss and debris cover evolution in the Afghanistan Hindu Kush Himalaya between 2000 and 2020Jamal A. N. Shokory0Stuart N. Lane1Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics (IDYST), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, SwitzerlandInstitute of Earth Surface Dynamics (IDYST), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, SwitzerlandGlaciers in Afghanistan are crucial elements for water resource and summer river flows. They are also threatened by rapid climate warming. This study presents an up-to-date assessment of ice cover loss for the entire country over two periods, 2000–2008 and 2008–2020, using newly developed remote sensing indices that include a more reliable determination of changing debris cover. The results suggest an estimated ice-covered area of 2,690.7 ± 108.2 km2 in 2020, that was 75 ± 0.7% clean ice and 25 ± 3.0 percent debris-covered ice. Total ice-covered area retreated by −0.16 ± 0.01 percent yr−1 between 2000 and 2008 and −0.46 ± 0.05 percent yr−1 between 2008 and 2020. Notably, 60 percent of ice cover loss (2000–2020) related to ice cover extents with a size ≤ 2.5 km2, comprising 60 percent of the total ice-covered area in 2000. Higher altitude accumulation zones also exhibited mass loss. However, there was also substantial spatial variation in these rates of loss based on geographical region, glacier size, and climate zones. In the north-eastern regions that are geographically close to or part of the north-west Karakoram ice cover was declining at a substantially lower rate, stable, or even increasing slightly, as compared with the northern and central regions of Afghanistan.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/15230430.2024.2373858Afghanistanclimate warmingglacier changewater resourcesremote sensing
spellingShingle Jamal A. N. Shokory
Stuart N. Lane
Ice cover loss and debris cover evolution in the Afghanistan Hindu Kush Himalaya between 2000 and 2020
Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research
Afghanistan
climate warming
glacier change
water resources
remote sensing
title Ice cover loss and debris cover evolution in the Afghanistan Hindu Kush Himalaya between 2000 and 2020
title_full Ice cover loss and debris cover evolution in the Afghanistan Hindu Kush Himalaya between 2000 and 2020
title_fullStr Ice cover loss and debris cover evolution in the Afghanistan Hindu Kush Himalaya between 2000 and 2020
title_full_unstemmed Ice cover loss and debris cover evolution in the Afghanistan Hindu Kush Himalaya between 2000 and 2020
title_short Ice cover loss and debris cover evolution in the Afghanistan Hindu Kush Himalaya between 2000 and 2020
title_sort ice cover loss and debris cover evolution in the afghanistan hindu kush himalaya between 2000 and 2020
topic Afghanistan
climate warming
glacier change
water resources
remote sensing
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/15230430.2024.2373858
work_keys_str_mv AT jamalanshokory icecoverlossanddebriscoverevolutionintheafghanistanhindukushhimalayabetween2000and2020
AT stuartnlane icecoverlossanddebriscoverevolutionintheafghanistanhindukushhimalayabetween2000and2020