Mitigating risk of credit reversal in nature-based climate solutions by optimally anticipating carbon release
Nature-based climate solutions supply carbon credits generated from net carbon drawdown in exchange for project funding, but their credibility is challenged by the inherent variability and impermanence of drawdown. By evaluating drawdown benefits from a social cost of carbon perspective, project dev...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | E-Ping Rau, James Gross, David Anthony Coomes, Thomas Swinfield, Anil Madhavapeddy, Andrew Balmford, Srinivasan Keshav |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Carbon Management |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/17583004.2024.2390854 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Evaluating the merit of carbon credits: Is there a lack of effectiveness in transitioning from direct payments for ecosystem services to REDD+ community-based incentives?
by: Virginia Hernanz, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
In the Name of the Climate: Extractive Capitalism and the Forest Carbon Offsets Market in the Amazon
by: Fabrina Pontes Furtado, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01) -
Estimation of carbon stocks of woody plant species in church forests of West Gojjam zone, Northwestern Ethiopia: Implications for climate change mitigation
by: Abebe Ayele Haile, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Does Participatory Forest Management Reduce Deforestation and Enhance Forest Cover? A Comparative Study of Selected Forest Sites in Adaba-Dodola, Ethiopia
by: Lemma Tiki, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01) -
Florida’s Agricultural Carbon Economy as Climate Action: The Potential Role of Farmers and Ranchers
by: Young Gu Her, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01)