A Critique and Evaluation of Methodology and Theory in Political Science
The main purpose of this study is to examine and evaluate the major strengths and weaknesses of David Marsh and Jerry Stoker's book entitled Methodology and Theory in Political Science. Since one of the most important areas of the philosophy of science is the field of transnational issues focus...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fas |
| Published: |
Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)
2020-07-01
|
| Series: | پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_5380_34659897360d081d9e87ec5bf19fab27.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841555226538016768 |
|---|---|
| author | Elham Rasooli Saniabadi |
| author_facet | Elham Rasooli Saniabadi |
| author_sort | Elham Rasooli Saniabadi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The main purpose of this study is to examine and evaluate the major strengths and weaknesses of David Marsh and Jerry Stoker's book entitled Methodology and Theory in Political Science. Since one of the most important areas of the philosophy of science is the field of transnational issues focusing on the issues of ontology, epistemology, and methodology, the main objective of this study is to bridge the gaps in two domains of epistemology and methodology. The book covers articles in three areas, including “ Political Science Approaches” , (Methodological Questions”, and “Theories about the Governments,” which were written by different authors from Britain universities, so these issues have been dealt with from a British approach. In this study, we first introduce the overall evaluation of the book, then we discuss the weaknesses and the disadvantages of the book. In the fifth section, the overall content evaluation of the book is presented, and in the final section, the most important strengths and disadvantages of the content of each chapter are enumerated. . This research is analytical with a critical approach through a case study. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-32b9d58dafeb4b26995d8dba65914a9d |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2383-1650 |
| language | fas |
| publishDate | 2020-07-01 |
| publisher | Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی |
| spelling | doaj-art-32b9d58dafeb4b26995d8dba65914a9d2025-01-08T05:47:43ZfasInstitute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی2383-16502020-07-0120515317410.30465/crtls.2020.27655.16305380A Critique and Evaluation of Methodology and Theory in Political ScienceElham Rasooli Saniabadi0Associate Professor of International Relations, Yazd University, YazdThe main purpose of this study is to examine and evaluate the major strengths and weaknesses of David Marsh and Jerry Stoker's book entitled Methodology and Theory in Political Science. Since one of the most important areas of the philosophy of science is the field of transnational issues focusing on the issues of ontology, epistemology, and methodology, the main objective of this study is to bridge the gaps in two domains of epistemology and methodology. The book covers articles in three areas, including “ Political Science Approaches” , (Methodological Questions”, and “Theories about the Governments,” which were written by different authors from Britain universities, so these issues have been dealt with from a British approach. In this study, we first introduce the overall evaluation of the book, then we discuss the weaknesses and the disadvantages of the book. In the fifth section, the overall content evaluation of the book is presented, and in the final section, the most important strengths and disadvantages of the content of each chapter are enumerated. . This research is analytical with a critical approach through a case study.https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_5380_34659897360d081d9e87ec5bf19fab27.pdftheorymethodpolitical sciencemet theorystate |
| spellingShingle | Elham Rasooli Saniabadi A Critique and Evaluation of Methodology and Theory in Political Science پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی theory method political science met theory state |
| title | A Critique and Evaluation of
Methodology and Theory in Political Science |
| title_full | A Critique and Evaluation of
Methodology and Theory in Political Science |
| title_fullStr | A Critique and Evaluation of
Methodology and Theory in Political Science |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Critique and Evaluation of
Methodology and Theory in Political Science |
| title_short | A Critique and Evaluation of
Methodology and Theory in Political Science |
| title_sort | critique and evaluation of methodology and theory in political science |
| topic | theory method political science met theory state |
| url | https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_5380_34659897360d081d9e87ec5bf19fab27.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT elhamrasoolisaniabadi acritiqueandevaluationofmethodologyandtheoryinpoliticalscience AT elhamrasoolisaniabadi critiqueandevaluationofmethodologyandtheoryinpoliticalscience |