Moral judgment of objectionable online content: Reporting decisions and punishment preferences on social media.
Harmful and inappropriate online content is prevalent, necessitating the need to understand how individuals judge and wish to mitigate the spread of negative content on social media. In an online study with a diverse sample of social media users (n = 294), we sought to elucidate factors that influen...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Sarah Vahed, Catalina Goanta, Pietro Ortolani, Alan G Sanfey |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0300960&type=printable |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Competing fairness ideals underlie wealth inequality across decision contexts
by: Inge Huijsmans, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
ASM-Based Objectionable Image Detection in Social Network Services
by: Sung-Il Joo, et al.
Published: (2014-03-01) -
Moral judgments and validity of law
by: A. B. Didikin
Published: (2019-12-01) -
Smith on the practicality and objectivity of moral judgments
by: Strandberg Caj
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Evaluating Human Pairwise Preference Judgments
by: Mark Dras
Published: (2024-06-01)