Decolonizing Forest: The Myth of <i>Panjurli</i> and <i>Guliga</i> in <i>Kantara</i> (2022)

Colonial ideologies reduce nature to a repository of extractable resources and portray the Indigenous communities’ religious understanding of nature as primitive and unscientific. Decolonization foregrounds the silenced Indigenous epistemes that critique exceptional human paradigms of colonial moder...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anandita Saraswat, Aratrika Das
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-10-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/11/1307
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846152551818330112
author Anandita Saraswat
Aratrika Das
author_facet Anandita Saraswat
Aratrika Das
author_sort Anandita Saraswat
collection DOAJ
description Colonial ideologies reduce nature to a repository of extractable resources and portray the Indigenous communities’ religious understanding of nature as primitive and unscientific. Decolonization foregrounds the silenced Indigenous epistemes that critique exceptional human paradigms of colonial modernity. This paper examines how traditional religious rituals function as a method of decolonization and discusses their exclusion from Western academia. It focuses on <i>Kantara</i>’s cinematic representation of the Indigenous ritual of <i>Bhoota Kola</i> and the worship of forest deities, <i>Panjurli</i> and <i>Guliga</i>, in the coastal areas of southern Karnataka and Kerala. These rituals emphasize the agency of the environment, where the forest, humans, and deities are porous and permeable. This non-anthropocentric understanding of humans questions the dominance of the secular narratives of posthuman theories in Western academia. Rituals foster ecological behaviours and highlight multispecies relationality, providing alternatives for sustainable futures. In emphasizing Indigenous religious practices, the paper undisciplines the Eurocentric study of religion and questions the disciplinary boundaries between scientific thought and Indigenous knowledge. Thus, this paper argues for the inclusion of regional cinemas from the Global South in Western academia to foreground Indigenous epistemes that undiscipline the study of religion and science.
format Article
id doaj-art-31fa4deae3584d2fa8ac6bbed92230cc
institution Kabale University
issn 2077-1444
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Religions
spelling doaj-art-31fa4deae3584d2fa8ac6bbed92230cc2024-11-26T18:19:13ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442024-10-011511130710.3390/rel15111307Decolonizing Forest: The Myth of <i>Panjurli</i> and <i>Guliga</i> in <i>Kantara</i> (2022)Anandita Saraswat0Aratrika Das1School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Indore 453 552, IndiaSchool of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Indore 453 552, IndiaColonial ideologies reduce nature to a repository of extractable resources and portray the Indigenous communities’ religious understanding of nature as primitive and unscientific. Decolonization foregrounds the silenced Indigenous epistemes that critique exceptional human paradigms of colonial modernity. This paper examines how traditional religious rituals function as a method of decolonization and discusses their exclusion from Western academia. It focuses on <i>Kantara</i>’s cinematic representation of the Indigenous ritual of <i>Bhoota Kola</i> and the worship of forest deities, <i>Panjurli</i> and <i>Guliga</i>, in the coastal areas of southern Karnataka and Kerala. These rituals emphasize the agency of the environment, where the forest, humans, and deities are porous and permeable. This non-anthropocentric understanding of humans questions the dominance of the secular narratives of posthuman theories in Western academia. Rituals foster ecological behaviours and highlight multispecies relationality, providing alternatives for sustainable futures. In emphasizing Indigenous religious practices, the paper undisciplines the Eurocentric study of religion and questions the disciplinary boundaries between scientific thought and Indigenous knowledge. Thus, this paper argues for the inclusion of regional cinemas from the Global South in Western academia to foreground Indigenous epistemes that undiscipline the study of religion and science.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/11/1307decolonizationIndigenous knowledgeposthumanismscienceundisciplining
spellingShingle Anandita Saraswat
Aratrika Das
Decolonizing Forest: The Myth of <i>Panjurli</i> and <i>Guliga</i> in <i>Kantara</i> (2022)
Religions
decolonization
Indigenous knowledge
posthumanism
science
undisciplining
title Decolonizing Forest: The Myth of <i>Panjurli</i> and <i>Guliga</i> in <i>Kantara</i> (2022)
title_full Decolonizing Forest: The Myth of <i>Panjurli</i> and <i>Guliga</i> in <i>Kantara</i> (2022)
title_fullStr Decolonizing Forest: The Myth of <i>Panjurli</i> and <i>Guliga</i> in <i>Kantara</i> (2022)
title_full_unstemmed Decolonizing Forest: The Myth of <i>Panjurli</i> and <i>Guliga</i> in <i>Kantara</i> (2022)
title_short Decolonizing Forest: The Myth of <i>Panjurli</i> and <i>Guliga</i> in <i>Kantara</i> (2022)
title_sort decolonizing forest the myth of i panjurli i and i guliga i in i kantara i 2022
topic decolonization
Indigenous knowledge
posthumanism
science
undisciplining
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/11/1307
work_keys_str_mv AT ananditasaraswat decolonizingforestthemythofipanjurliiandiguligaiinikantarai2022
AT aratrikadas decolonizingforestthemythofipanjurliiandiguligaiinikantarai2022