The radical innovation design comparator to evaluate the effectiveness of design solutions according to usage contexts
The radical innovation design (RID) comparator is an unprecedented method for design comparison. It overcomes the limitations of traditional methods with a nuanced, structured approach that emphasizes detailed analysis over simple grading. At its core, the RID comparator employs a novel ontology bas...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | Design Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2053470124000246/type/journal_article |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846128959564021760 |
|---|---|
| author | Bernard Yannou Robin Lecomte François Cluzel |
| author_facet | Bernard Yannou Robin Lecomte François Cluzel |
| author_sort | Bernard Yannou |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The radical innovation design (RID) comparator is an unprecedented method for design comparison. It overcomes the limitations of traditional methods with a nuanced, structured approach that emphasizes detailed analysis over simple grading. At its core, the RID comparator employs a novel ontology based on the RID building blocks, enabling a precise alignment of activities and solutions. This alignment is deepened through the innovative “quantities of pain” metric, a tool that allows for a refined evaluation and comparison of solutions, facilitating the calculation of effectiveness indicators in a data-driven manner. The true impact of the method is demonstrated through an industrial use case on solutions for cleaning solar panels. The RID comparator demonstrates its practical efficacy in addressing complex, multifactorial design challenges, by constructing a cognitive model of the cleaning activity not only encapsulating the myriad aspects of the design problem but also generating a wealth of discussion and consensus-building among stakeholders. The resultant cognitive model serves as a pivotal tool in redefining the process of generating innovation briefs, deeply rooted in the actual needs and constraints of real-world scenarios. In essence, the RID comparator method significantly enhances the efficiency and quality of innovation processes, particularly in complex industrial contexts. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-317f117b2d0c49d4a78d83619a05dcbd |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2053-4701 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Design Science |
| spelling | doaj-art-317f117b2d0c49d4a78d83619a05dcbd2024-12-10T11:57:59ZengCambridge University PressDesign Science2053-47012024-01-011010.1017/dsj.2024.24The radical innovation design comparator to evaluate the effectiveness of design solutions according to usage contextsBernard Yannou0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4511-4450Robin Lecomte1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0533-335XFrançois Cluzel2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8427-9536Laboratoire Genie Industriel, CentraleSupélec, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette Cédex, FranceLaboratoire Genie Industriel, CentraleSupélec, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette Cédex, FranceLaboratoire Genie Industriel, CentraleSupélec, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette Cédex, FranceThe radical innovation design (RID) comparator is an unprecedented method for design comparison. It overcomes the limitations of traditional methods with a nuanced, structured approach that emphasizes detailed analysis over simple grading. At its core, the RID comparator employs a novel ontology based on the RID building blocks, enabling a precise alignment of activities and solutions. This alignment is deepened through the innovative “quantities of pain” metric, a tool that allows for a refined evaluation and comparison of solutions, facilitating the calculation of effectiveness indicators in a data-driven manner. The true impact of the method is demonstrated through an industrial use case on solutions for cleaning solar panels. The RID comparator demonstrates its practical efficacy in addressing complex, multifactorial design challenges, by constructing a cognitive model of the cleaning activity not only encapsulating the myriad aspects of the design problem but also generating a wealth of discussion and consensus-building among stakeholders. The resultant cognitive model serves as a pivotal tool in redefining the process of generating innovation briefs, deeply rooted in the actual needs and constraints of real-world scenarios. In essence, the RID comparator method significantly enhances the efficiency and quality of innovation processes, particularly in complex industrial contexts.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2053470124000246/type/journal_articleActivityCollaborative innovationDesign comparisonDesign selectionInnovation briefInnovation processSolution evaluationUsage contextsUsage-driven innovationUser-centred design |
| spellingShingle | Bernard Yannou Robin Lecomte François Cluzel The radical innovation design comparator to evaluate the effectiveness of design solutions according to usage contexts Design Science Activity Collaborative innovation Design comparison Design selection Innovation brief Innovation process Solution evaluation Usage contexts Usage-driven innovation User-centred design |
| title | The radical innovation design comparator to evaluate the effectiveness of design solutions according to usage contexts |
| title_full | The radical innovation design comparator to evaluate the effectiveness of design solutions according to usage contexts |
| title_fullStr | The radical innovation design comparator to evaluate the effectiveness of design solutions according to usage contexts |
| title_full_unstemmed | The radical innovation design comparator to evaluate the effectiveness of design solutions according to usage contexts |
| title_short | The radical innovation design comparator to evaluate the effectiveness of design solutions according to usage contexts |
| title_sort | radical innovation design comparator to evaluate the effectiveness of design solutions according to usage contexts |
| topic | Activity Collaborative innovation Design comparison Design selection Innovation brief Innovation process Solution evaluation Usage contexts Usage-driven innovation User-centred design |
| url | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2053470124000246/type/journal_article |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bernardyannou theradicalinnovationdesigncomparatortoevaluatetheeffectivenessofdesignsolutionsaccordingtousagecontexts AT robinlecomte theradicalinnovationdesigncomparatortoevaluatetheeffectivenessofdesignsolutionsaccordingtousagecontexts AT francoiscluzel theradicalinnovationdesigncomparatortoevaluatetheeffectivenessofdesignsolutionsaccordingtousagecontexts AT bernardyannou radicalinnovationdesigncomparatortoevaluatetheeffectivenessofdesignsolutionsaccordingtousagecontexts AT robinlecomte radicalinnovationdesigncomparatortoevaluatetheeffectivenessofdesignsolutionsaccordingtousagecontexts AT francoiscluzel radicalinnovationdesigncomparatortoevaluatetheeffectivenessofdesignsolutionsaccordingtousagecontexts |