A gender critique of the EU directive on platform work from the perspective of feminised and racialised labour

The Directive on improving working conditions in platform work challenges deeply entrenched inequalities in platform work by regulating some aspects of the labour process that remain unregulated in most EU Member States. The Directive is the outcome of labour struggles and court cases that have take...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nelli Kambouri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Bologna 2024-12-01
Series:Labour & Law Issues
Subjects:
Online Access:https://labourlaw.unibo.it/article/view/20863
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841550055601864704
author Nelli Kambouri
author_facet Nelli Kambouri
author_sort Nelli Kambouri
collection DOAJ
description The Directive on improving working conditions in platform work challenges deeply entrenched inequalities in platform work by regulating some aspects of the labour process that remain unregulated in most EU Member States. The Directive is the outcome of labour struggles and court cases that have taken place during the past years against the misclassification of platform workers as independent self-employed contractors and the non-transparent usage of algorithms in human resources management. Nevertheless, the Directive is gender blind and obscures intersectional aspects of algorithmic management. In the text of the directive there are few references to “gender” or to “women” and important issues like work-life balance, equal pay for equal work, sexual harassment, intersectional gender discrimination, or paid maternity and paternity leaves are mentioned but not considered. Based on the relevant literature, the article explores the gendered challenges that will emerge from its implementation especially regarding reproductive labour and algorithmic biases. More specifically the analysis uses existing research on intersectional gender inequalities from different areas of platform work, mostly crowdwork and domestic and care work, to explore how it will impact on the platform economy. The paper concludes by arguing that the fact that the Directive obscures the specific forms that gender inequality takes in platforms will further exasperate intersectional gender inequalities and discrimination in platform work
format Article
id doaj-art-3178109953a54afbb599e8afae55d9ce
institution Kabale University
issn 2421-2695
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher University of Bologna
record_format Article
series Labour & Law Issues
spelling doaj-art-3178109953a54afbb599e8afae55d9ce2025-01-10T09:58:04ZengUniversity of BolognaLabour & Law Issues2421-26952024-12-01102527610.6092/issn.2421-2695/2086319235A gender critique of the EU directive on platform work from the perspective of feminised and racialised labourNelli Kambouri0Panteion University of Social and Political SciencesThe Directive on improving working conditions in platform work challenges deeply entrenched inequalities in platform work by regulating some aspects of the labour process that remain unregulated in most EU Member States. The Directive is the outcome of labour struggles and court cases that have taken place during the past years against the misclassification of platform workers as independent self-employed contractors and the non-transparent usage of algorithms in human resources management. Nevertheless, the Directive is gender blind and obscures intersectional aspects of algorithmic management. In the text of the directive there are few references to “gender” or to “women” and important issues like work-life balance, equal pay for equal work, sexual harassment, intersectional gender discrimination, or paid maternity and paternity leaves are mentioned but not considered. Based on the relevant literature, the article explores the gendered challenges that will emerge from its implementation especially regarding reproductive labour and algorithmic biases. More specifically the analysis uses existing research on intersectional gender inequalities from different areas of platform work, mostly crowdwork and domestic and care work, to explore how it will impact on the platform economy. The paper concludes by arguing that the fact that the Directive obscures the specific forms that gender inequality takes in platforms will further exasperate intersectional gender inequalities and discrimination in platform workhttps://labourlaw.unibo.it/article/view/20863directive on improving working conditions in platform workgendercaredomestic workwork-life balance
spellingShingle Nelli Kambouri
A gender critique of the EU directive on platform work from the perspective of feminised and racialised labour
Labour & Law Issues
directive on improving working conditions in platform work
gender
care
domestic work
work-life balance
title A gender critique of the EU directive on platform work from the perspective of feminised and racialised labour
title_full A gender critique of the EU directive on platform work from the perspective of feminised and racialised labour
title_fullStr A gender critique of the EU directive on platform work from the perspective of feminised and racialised labour
title_full_unstemmed A gender critique of the EU directive on platform work from the perspective of feminised and racialised labour
title_short A gender critique of the EU directive on platform work from the perspective of feminised and racialised labour
title_sort gender critique of the eu directive on platform work from the perspective of feminised and racialised labour
topic directive on improving working conditions in platform work
gender
care
domestic work
work-life balance
url https://labourlaw.unibo.it/article/view/20863
work_keys_str_mv AT nellikambouri agendercritiqueoftheeudirectiveonplatformworkfromtheperspectiveoffeminisedandracialisedlabour
AT nellikambouri gendercritiqueoftheeudirectiveonplatformworkfromtheperspectiveoffeminisedandracialisedlabour