Low versus high initial oral glucocorticoid dose for lupus nephritis: a pooled analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials

Objective Traditional initial treatment regimens for lupus nephritis (LN) used oral glucocorticoids (GC) in starting doses up to 1.0 mg/kg/day prednisone equivalent with or without a preceding intravenous methylprednisolone pulse. More recent management guidelines recommend lower starting oral GC do...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amit Saxena, Peter Izmirly, Jill P Buyon, Cristina Sorrento, Janine Sullivan, Monica Gamez-Perez, Jammie Law, Howard Michael Belmont
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2025-01-01
Series:Lupus Science and Medicine
Online Access:https://lupus.bmj.com/content/12/1/e001351.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841556483691511808
author Amit Saxena
Peter Izmirly
Jill P Buyon
Cristina Sorrento
Janine Sullivan
Monica Gamez-Perez
Jammie Law
Howard Michael Belmont
author_facet Amit Saxena
Peter Izmirly
Jill P Buyon
Cristina Sorrento
Janine Sullivan
Monica Gamez-Perez
Jammie Law
Howard Michael Belmont
author_sort Amit Saxena
collection DOAJ
description Objective Traditional initial treatment regimens for lupus nephritis (LN) used oral glucocorticoids (GC) in starting doses up to 1.0 mg/kg/day prednisone equivalent with or without a preceding intravenous methylprednisolone pulse. More recent management guidelines recommend lower starting oral GC doses following intravenous pulse therapy. As there have been no large studies directly comparing patients receiving low versus high initial oral GC doses, this pooled analysis of high-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) aims to evaluate differences in efficacy and safety.Methods Published data were analysed from RCTs that assessed variable GC doses in the standard of care (SOC) treatment arms. Patients receiving starting prednisone doses up to 0.5 mg/kg/day (low dose) were compared with 1.0 mg/kg/day (high dose). Complete renal response requiring urine protein-creatinine ratio <0.5 mg/mg (CRR 0.5), CRR or partial renal response (PRR), serious adverse events (SAE) and SAE due to infections at 12 months of treatment were compared between groups.Results 417 patients from SOC arms of five studies were exposed to low-dose initial GC after intravenous pulse, while 521 patients from four studies were treated with high-dose oral GC. In patients with low-dose oral GC, 25.2% achieved CRR 0.5 at 12 months compared with 27.2% in high-dose groups, p=0.54. CRR or PRR was attained in 48.7% low-dose vs 43.6% high-dose patients, p=0.14. SAEs and infection SAEs were less common in the low-dose GC group (19.4% vs 31.6%, p<0.001 and 9.8% vs 16.5%, p=0.012, respectively).Conclusions Based on pooled RCT data, there was no significant difference in 12-month renal responses between patients receiving low-dose prednisone following intravenous GC compared with those receiving initial high doses. SAEs were less frequent in patients receiving low-dose initial GC. These findings support the use of lower oral GC doses in LN treatment.
format Article
id doaj-art-312e9692b32c48d391e31562d98b959d
institution Kabale University
issn 2053-8790
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series Lupus Science and Medicine
spelling doaj-art-312e9692b32c48d391e31562d98b959d2025-01-07T08:10:10ZengBMJ Publishing GroupLupus Science and Medicine2053-87902025-01-0112110.1136/lupus-2024-001351Low versus high initial oral glucocorticoid dose for lupus nephritis: a pooled analysis of randomised controlled clinical trialsAmit Saxena0Peter Izmirly1Jill P Buyon2Cristina Sorrento3Janine Sullivan4Monica Gamez-Perez5Jammie Law6Howard Michael Belmont7Department of Medicine, Dvision of Rheumatology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, New York, USADepartment of Medicine, Dvision of Rheumatology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, New York, USADepartment of Medicine, Dvision of Rheumatology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, New York, USADepartment of Medicine, Dvision of Rheumatology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, New York, USADepartment of Medicine, Dvision of Rheumatology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, New York, USADepartment of Medicine, Dvision of Rheumatology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, New York, USADepartment of Medicine, Dvision of Rheumatology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, New York, USADepartment of Medicine, Dvision of Rheumatology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, New York, USAObjective Traditional initial treatment regimens for lupus nephritis (LN) used oral glucocorticoids (GC) in starting doses up to 1.0 mg/kg/day prednisone equivalent with or without a preceding intravenous methylprednisolone pulse. More recent management guidelines recommend lower starting oral GC doses following intravenous pulse therapy. As there have been no large studies directly comparing patients receiving low versus high initial oral GC doses, this pooled analysis of high-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) aims to evaluate differences in efficacy and safety.Methods Published data were analysed from RCTs that assessed variable GC doses in the standard of care (SOC) treatment arms. Patients receiving starting prednisone doses up to 0.5 mg/kg/day (low dose) were compared with 1.0 mg/kg/day (high dose). Complete renal response requiring urine protein-creatinine ratio <0.5 mg/mg (CRR 0.5), CRR or partial renal response (PRR), serious adverse events (SAE) and SAE due to infections at 12 months of treatment were compared between groups.Results 417 patients from SOC arms of five studies were exposed to low-dose initial GC after intravenous pulse, while 521 patients from four studies were treated with high-dose oral GC. In patients with low-dose oral GC, 25.2% achieved CRR 0.5 at 12 months compared with 27.2% in high-dose groups, p=0.54. CRR or PRR was attained in 48.7% low-dose vs 43.6% high-dose patients, p=0.14. SAEs and infection SAEs were less common in the low-dose GC group (19.4% vs 31.6%, p<0.001 and 9.8% vs 16.5%, p=0.012, respectively).Conclusions Based on pooled RCT data, there was no significant difference in 12-month renal responses between patients receiving low-dose prednisone following intravenous GC compared with those receiving initial high doses. SAEs were less frequent in patients receiving low-dose initial GC. These findings support the use of lower oral GC doses in LN treatment.https://lupus.bmj.com/content/12/1/e001351.full
spellingShingle Amit Saxena
Peter Izmirly
Jill P Buyon
Cristina Sorrento
Janine Sullivan
Monica Gamez-Perez
Jammie Law
Howard Michael Belmont
Low versus high initial oral glucocorticoid dose for lupus nephritis: a pooled analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials
Lupus Science and Medicine
title Low versus high initial oral glucocorticoid dose for lupus nephritis: a pooled analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials
title_full Low versus high initial oral glucocorticoid dose for lupus nephritis: a pooled analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials
title_fullStr Low versus high initial oral glucocorticoid dose for lupus nephritis: a pooled analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Low versus high initial oral glucocorticoid dose for lupus nephritis: a pooled analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials
title_short Low versus high initial oral glucocorticoid dose for lupus nephritis: a pooled analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials
title_sort low versus high initial oral glucocorticoid dose for lupus nephritis a pooled analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials
url https://lupus.bmj.com/content/12/1/e001351.full
work_keys_str_mv AT amitsaxena lowversushighinitialoralglucocorticoiddoseforlupusnephritisapooledanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT peterizmirly lowversushighinitialoralglucocorticoiddoseforlupusnephritisapooledanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT jillpbuyon lowversushighinitialoralglucocorticoiddoseforlupusnephritisapooledanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT cristinasorrento lowversushighinitialoralglucocorticoiddoseforlupusnephritisapooledanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT janinesullivan lowversushighinitialoralglucocorticoiddoseforlupusnephritisapooledanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT monicagamezperez lowversushighinitialoralglucocorticoiddoseforlupusnephritisapooledanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT jammielaw lowversushighinitialoralglucocorticoiddoseforlupusnephritisapooledanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT howardmichaelbelmont lowversushighinitialoralglucocorticoiddoseforlupusnephritisapooledanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrials