Argumenter pour ou contre son opinion

This research assesses how well students in professional communication succeed in writing an argumentative essay without introducing their personal beliefs. Content analysis shows that the emphasis is put on ethos and pathos rather than on logos, so as to influence the reader by appealing to his/her...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Céline Beaudet, Denis Alamargot
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Université Laval 2011-10-01
Series:Communication
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/communication/2330
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846132456747433984
author Céline Beaudet
Denis Alamargot
author_facet Céline Beaudet
Denis Alamargot
author_sort Céline Beaudet
collection DOAJ
description This research assesses how well students in professional communication succeed in writing an argumentative essay without introducing their personal beliefs. Content analysis shows that the emphasis is put on ethos and pathos rather than on logos, so as to influence the reader by appealing to his/her identification and emotions. Educational guidelines, designed to help students temper their own opinions, are proposed in conclusion.
format Article
id doaj-art-3036311cfb404ec4b4e5c21f1c9dc570
institution Kabale University
issn 1189-3788
1920-7344
language fra
publishDate 2011-10-01
publisher Université Laval
record_format Article
series Communication
spelling doaj-art-3036311cfb404ec4b4e5c21f1c9dc5702024-12-09T14:48:24ZfraUniversité LavalCommunication1189-37881920-73442011-10-0129110.4000/communication.2330Argumenter pour ou contre son opinionCéline BeaudetDenis AlamargotThis research assesses how well students in professional communication succeed in writing an argumentative essay without introducing their personal beliefs. Content analysis shows that the emphasis is put on ethos and pathos rather than on logos, so as to influence the reader by appealing to his/her identification and emotions. Educational guidelines, designed to help students temper their own opinions, are proposed in conclusion.https://journals.openedition.org/communication/2330argumentationrhetoricwritingteaching of writingprofessional training
spellingShingle Céline Beaudet
Denis Alamargot
Argumenter pour ou contre son opinion
Communication
argumentation
rhetoric
writing
teaching of writing
professional training
title Argumenter pour ou contre son opinion
title_full Argumenter pour ou contre son opinion
title_fullStr Argumenter pour ou contre son opinion
title_full_unstemmed Argumenter pour ou contre son opinion
title_short Argumenter pour ou contre son opinion
title_sort argumenter pour ou contre son opinion
topic argumentation
rhetoric
writing
teaching of writing
professional training
url https://journals.openedition.org/communication/2330
work_keys_str_mv AT celinebeaudet argumenterpouroucontresonopinion
AT denisalamargot argumenterpouroucontresonopinion