Global disparities in ophthalmology education and alignment with international council of ophthalmology guidelines among medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Ophthalmology education is essential for equipping medical personnel to proficiently manage eye health concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate ophthalmology education among medical students, medical schools, and physicians, identifying key gaps and areas for i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luksanaporn Krungkraipetch, Naruporn Krungkraipetch, Sasikarnt Leelawongs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-03-01
Series:BMC Medical Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07012-1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849392617341583360
author Luksanaporn Krungkraipetch
Naruporn Krungkraipetch
Sasikarnt Leelawongs
author_facet Luksanaporn Krungkraipetch
Naruporn Krungkraipetch
Sasikarnt Leelawongs
author_sort Luksanaporn Krungkraipetch
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Ophthalmology education is essential for equipping medical personnel to proficiently manage eye health concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate ophthalmology education among medical students, medical schools, and physicians, identifying key gaps and areas for improvement. Methods A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus) identified studies published between January 2006 and December 2024. Eligible studies assessed competency levels, training duration, curriculum alignment, and compliance with ICO guidelines. The Preferred Reporting Items for the PRISMA statement were used for our reporting of the study selection process. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects and fixed-effects models, with heterogeneity assessed using I² statistics. Multiple regression analyses examined predictors of ophthalmology competency. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024604742. Results Twelve studies from seven countries, involving 2,537 participants, were included. The pooled competency estimate was 62.5% (I² = 96.6%), with lower competency among medical students (55.8%) compared to physicians (83.3%). Training duration varied, with pooled estimates of 1.5 weeks for medical students, 2.5 weeks for medical schools, and 2.0 weeks for physicians. Curriculum alignment with ICO guidelines was 65% (I² = 96.2%), reflecting institutional variability. Compliance with ICO guidelines was also inconsistent (65%, I² = 99.2%). Multiple regression analysis identified competency level (β = 0.50, p < 0.001) and training duration (β = 0.42, p = 0.003) as the strongest predictors of ophthalmology education outcomes. Conclusions Significant disparities exist in ophthalmology education. Standardized curricula, extended training, and enhanced practical skill development are needed to improve competency among medical trainees. Clinical trial number Not applicable.
format Article
id doaj-art-2feae6df2ff44ccdb7d1a23f0779f21a
institution Kabale University
issn 1472-6920
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Education
spelling doaj-art-2feae6df2ff44ccdb7d1a23f0779f21a2025-08-20T03:40:44ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202025-03-0125111110.1186/s12909-025-07012-1Global disparities in ophthalmology education and alignment with international council of ophthalmology guidelines among medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysisLuksanaporn Krungkraipetch0Naruporn Krungkraipetch1Sasikarnt Leelawongs2Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Burapha UniversityErawan HospitalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Burapha UniversityAbstract Background Ophthalmology education is essential for equipping medical personnel to proficiently manage eye health concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate ophthalmology education among medical students, medical schools, and physicians, identifying key gaps and areas for improvement. Methods A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus) identified studies published between January 2006 and December 2024. Eligible studies assessed competency levels, training duration, curriculum alignment, and compliance with ICO guidelines. The Preferred Reporting Items for the PRISMA statement were used for our reporting of the study selection process. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects and fixed-effects models, with heterogeneity assessed using I² statistics. Multiple regression analyses examined predictors of ophthalmology competency. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024604742. Results Twelve studies from seven countries, involving 2,537 participants, were included. The pooled competency estimate was 62.5% (I² = 96.6%), with lower competency among medical students (55.8%) compared to physicians (83.3%). Training duration varied, with pooled estimates of 1.5 weeks for medical students, 2.5 weeks for medical schools, and 2.0 weeks for physicians. Curriculum alignment with ICO guidelines was 65% (I² = 96.2%), reflecting institutional variability. Compliance with ICO guidelines was also inconsistent (65%, I² = 99.2%). Multiple regression analysis identified competency level (β = 0.50, p < 0.001) and training duration (β = 0.42, p = 0.003) as the strongest predictors of ophthalmology education outcomes. Conclusions Significant disparities exist in ophthalmology education. Standardized curricula, extended training, and enhanced practical skill development are needed to improve competency among medical trainees. Clinical trial number Not applicable.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07012-1Ophthalmology educationMedical studentInternational council of ophthalmology guidelinesSystematic reviewMeta-analysis
spellingShingle Luksanaporn Krungkraipetch
Naruporn Krungkraipetch
Sasikarnt Leelawongs
Global disparities in ophthalmology education and alignment with international council of ophthalmology guidelines among medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BMC Medical Education
Ophthalmology education
Medical student
International council of ophthalmology guidelines
Systematic review
Meta-analysis
title Global disparities in ophthalmology education and alignment with international council of ophthalmology guidelines among medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Global disparities in ophthalmology education and alignment with international council of ophthalmology guidelines among medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Global disparities in ophthalmology education and alignment with international council of ophthalmology guidelines among medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Global disparities in ophthalmology education and alignment with international council of ophthalmology guidelines among medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Global disparities in ophthalmology education and alignment with international council of ophthalmology guidelines among medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort global disparities in ophthalmology education and alignment with international council of ophthalmology guidelines among medical students a systematic review and meta analysis
topic Ophthalmology education
Medical student
International council of ophthalmology guidelines
Systematic review
Meta-analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07012-1
work_keys_str_mv AT luksanapornkrungkraipetch globaldisparitiesinophthalmologyeducationandalignmentwithinternationalcouncilofophthalmologyguidelinesamongmedicalstudentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT narupornkrungkraipetch globaldisparitiesinophthalmologyeducationandalignmentwithinternationalcouncilofophthalmologyguidelinesamongmedicalstudentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sasikarntleelawongs globaldisparitiesinophthalmologyeducationandalignmentwithinternationalcouncilofophthalmologyguidelinesamongmedicalstudentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis