Comparison Between HB and ISO Standard for Calculating Bevel Gear Tooth Surface Contact Fatigue Strength
In order to correctly evaluate the gear strength calculation results in different standards, the difference between Chinese aviation industry standard (HB) and international standardization organization standard (ISO) in calculating the load capacity of bevel gear tooth surface contact fatigue is an...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | zho |
Published: |
Editorial Office of Journal of Mechanical Transmission
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Jixie chuandong |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jxcd.net.cn/thesisDetails#10.16578/j.issn.1004.2539.2021.04.025 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841547278020509696 |
---|---|
author | Wenshuang Teng Mei Guo Zhenhai Song |
author_facet | Wenshuang Teng Mei Guo Zhenhai Song |
author_sort | Wenshuang Teng |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In order to correctly evaluate the gear strength calculation results in different standards, the difference between Chinese aviation industry standard (HB) and international standardization organization standard (ISO) in calculating the load capacity of bevel gear tooth surface contact fatigue is analyzed and compared. Through the two ways of comparison of calculation methods and examples, the differences of the two standard calculation formulas, the types of correction coefficients, the differences in values and their effects on the calculation results are found out. The results show that the ISO standard considers more influence factors than the HB standard, and the range is wider. Especially, there is a great difference in the calculation of dynamic load coefficient, which makes the basic value of contact stress calculated by ISO standard smaller, the calculated contact stress equivalent, and the allowable contact stress larger. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-2f7b7ef2a8ab40459da7a9627610f6c5 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1004-2539 |
language | zho |
publishDate | 2021-04-01 |
publisher | Editorial Office of Journal of Mechanical Transmission |
record_format | Article |
series | Jixie chuandong |
spelling | doaj-art-2f7b7ef2a8ab40459da7a9627610f6c52025-01-10T14:49:30ZzhoEditorial Office of Journal of Mechanical TransmissionJixie chuandong1004-25392021-04-01451561598813582Comparison Between HB and ISO Standard for Calculating Bevel Gear Tooth Surface Contact Fatigue StrengthWenshuang TengMei GuoZhenhai SongIn order to correctly evaluate the gear strength calculation results in different standards, the difference between Chinese aviation industry standard (HB) and international standardization organization standard (ISO) in calculating the load capacity of bevel gear tooth surface contact fatigue is analyzed and compared. Through the two ways of comparison of calculation methods and examples, the differences of the two standard calculation formulas, the types of correction coefficients, the differences in values and their effects on the calculation results are found out. The results show that the ISO standard considers more influence factors than the HB standard, and the range is wider. Especially, there is a great difference in the calculation of dynamic load coefficient, which makes the basic value of contact stress calculated by ISO standard smaller, the calculated contact stress equivalent, and the allowable contact stress larger.http://www.jxcd.net.cn/thesisDetails#10.16578/j.issn.1004.2539.2021.04.025HB standardISO standardBevel gearContact fatigueDifference |
spellingShingle | Wenshuang Teng Mei Guo Zhenhai Song Comparison Between HB and ISO Standard for Calculating Bevel Gear Tooth Surface Contact Fatigue Strength Jixie chuandong HB standard ISO standard Bevel gear Contact fatigue Difference |
title | Comparison Between HB and ISO Standard for Calculating Bevel Gear Tooth Surface Contact Fatigue Strength |
title_full | Comparison Between HB and ISO Standard for Calculating Bevel Gear Tooth Surface Contact Fatigue Strength |
title_fullStr | Comparison Between HB and ISO Standard for Calculating Bevel Gear Tooth Surface Contact Fatigue Strength |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison Between HB and ISO Standard for Calculating Bevel Gear Tooth Surface Contact Fatigue Strength |
title_short | Comparison Between HB and ISO Standard for Calculating Bevel Gear Tooth Surface Contact Fatigue Strength |
title_sort | comparison between hb and iso standard for calculating bevel gear tooth surface contact fatigue strength |
topic | HB standard ISO standard Bevel gear Contact fatigue Difference |
url | http://www.jxcd.net.cn/thesisDetails#10.16578/j.issn.1004.2539.2021.04.025 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wenshuangteng comparisonbetweenhbandisostandardforcalculatingbevelgeartoothsurfacecontactfatiguestrength AT meiguo comparisonbetweenhbandisostandardforcalculatingbevelgeartoothsurfacecontactfatiguestrength AT zhenhaisong comparisonbetweenhbandisostandardforcalculatingbevelgeartoothsurfacecontactfatiguestrength |