A noninvasive automated device for remotely collaring and weighing mule deer
ABSTRACT Wildlife biologists capture deer (Odocoileus spp.) annually to attach transmitters and collect basic information (e.g., animal mass and sex) as part of ongoing research and monitoring activities. Traditional capture techniques induce stress in animals and can be expensive, inefficient, and...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2019-12-01
|
| Series: | Wildlife Society Bulletin |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1034 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846118868405190656 |
|---|---|
| author | Chad J. Bishop Mathew W. Alldredge Daniel P. Walsh Eric J. Bergman Charles R. Anderson Jr. Darlene Kilpatrick Joe Bakel Christophe Febvre |
| author_facet | Chad J. Bishop Mathew W. Alldredge Daniel P. Walsh Eric J. Bergman Charles R. Anderson Jr. Darlene Kilpatrick Joe Bakel Christophe Febvre |
| author_sort | Chad J. Bishop |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ABSTRACT Wildlife biologists capture deer (Odocoileus spp.) annually to attach transmitters and collect basic information (e.g., animal mass and sex) as part of ongoing research and monitoring activities. Traditional capture techniques induce stress in animals and can be expensive, inefficient, and dangerous. They are also impractical for some urbanized settings. We designed and evaluated a device for mule deer (O. hemionus) that automatically attached an expandable radiocollar to a ≥6‐month‐old fawn and recorded the fawn's mass and sex, without physically restraining the animal. The device did not require on‐site human presence to operate. Students and faculty in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Colorado State University produced a conceptual model and early prototype. Professional engineers at Dynamic Group Circuit Design, Inc. in Fort Collins, Colorado, USA, produced a fully functional prototype of the device. Using the device, we remotely collared, weighed, and identified sex of 8 free‐ranging mule deer fawns during winters 2010–2011 and 2011–2012. Collars were modified to shed from deer approximately 1 month after the collaring event. Two fawns were successfully recollared after they shed the first collars they received. Thus, we observed 10 successful collaring events involving 8 unique fawns. Fawns demonstrated minimal response to collaring events, either remaining in the device or calmly exiting. A fawn typically required ≥1 weeks of daily exposure before fully entering the device and extending its head through the outstretched collar, which was necessary for a collaring event to occur. This slow acclimation period limited utility of the device when compared with traditional capture techniques. Future work should focus on device modifications and altered baiting strategies that decrease fawn acclimation period, and in turn, increase collaring rates, providing a noninvasive and perhaps cost‐effective alternative for monitoring mid‐ to large‐sized mammal species. © 2019 The Wildlife Society. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-2f00375fc9aa49968f9f1560aa13d266 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2328-5540 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2019-12-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Wildlife Society Bulletin |
| spelling | doaj-art-2f00375fc9aa49968f9f1560aa13d2662024-12-17T08:57:21ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402019-12-0143471772510.1002/wsb.1034A noninvasive automated device for remotely collaring and weighing mule deerChad J. Bishop0Mathew W. Alldredge1Daniel P. Walsh2Eric J. Bergman3Charles R. Anderson Jr.4Darlene Kilpatrick5Joe Bakel6Christophe Febvre7Colorado Parks and Wildlife 317 W Prospect Road Fort Collins CO 80526 USAColorado Parks and Wildlife 317 W Prospect Road Fort Collins CO 80526 USAColorado Parks and Wildlife 317 W Prospect Road Fort Collins CO 80526 USAColorado Parks and Wildlife 317 W Prospect Road Fort Collins CO 80526 USAColorado Parks and Wildlife 317 W Prospect Road Fort Collins CO 80526 USAColorado Parks and Wildlife 317 W Prospect Road Fort Collins CO 80526 USADynamic Group Circuit Design, Inc. 2629 Redwing Road, Suite 360 Fort Collins CO 80525 USADynamic Group Circuit Design, Inc. 2629 Redwing Road, Suite 360 Fort Collins CO 80525 USAABSTRACT Wildlife biologists capture deer (Odocoileus spp.) annually to attach transmitters and collect basic information (e.g., animal mass and sex) as part of ongoing research and monitoring activities. Traditional capture techniques induce stress in animals and can be expensive, inefficient, and dangerous. They are also impractical for some urbanized settings. We designed and evaluated a device for mule deer (O. hemionus) that automatically attached an expandable radiocollar to a ≥6‐month‐old fawn and recorded the fawn's mass and sex, without physically restraining the animal. The device did not require on‐site human presence to operate. Students and faculty in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Colorado State University produced a conceptual model and early prototype. Professional engineers at Dynamic Group Circuit Design, Inc. in Fort Collins, Colorado, USA, produced a fully functional prototype of the device. Using the device, we remotely collared, weighed, and identified sex of 8 free‐ranging mule deer fawns during winters 2010–2011 and 2011–2012. Collars were modified to shed from deer approximately 1 month after the collaring event. Two fawns were successfully recollared after they shed the first collars they received. Thus, we observed 10 successful collaring events involving 8 unique fawns. Fawns demonstrated minimal response to collaring events, either remaining in the device or calmly exiting. A fawn typically required ≥1 weeks of daily exposure before fully entering the device and extending its head through the outstretched collar, which was necessary for a collaring event to occur. This slow acclimation period limited utility of the device when compared with traditional capture techniques. Future work should focus on device modifications and altered baiting strategies that decrease fawn acclimation period, and in turn, increase collaring rates, providing a noninvasive and perhaps cost‐effective alternative for monitoring mid‐ to large‐sized mammal species. © 2019 The Wildlife Society.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1034automatedbaitingcapturecapture techniquescollaringfawn |
| spellingShingle | Chad J. Bishop Mathew W. Alldredge Daniel P. Walsh Eric J. Bergman Charles R. Anderson Jr. Darlene Kilpatrick Joe Bakel Christophe Febvre A noninvasive automated device for remotely collaring and weighing mule deer Wildlife Society Bulletin automated baiting capture capture techniques collaring fawn |
| title | A noninvasive automated device for remotely collaring and weighing mule deer |
| title_full | A noninvasive automated device for remotely collaring and weighing mule deer |
| title_fullStr | A noninvasive automated device for remotely collaring and weighing mule deer |
| title_full_unstemmed | A noninvasive automated device for remotely collaring and weighing mule deer |
| title_short | A noninvasive automated device for remotely collaring and weighing mule deer |
| title_sort | noninvasive automated device for remotely collaring and weighing mule deer |
| topic | automated baiting capture capture techniques collaring fawn |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1034 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT chadjbishop anoninvasiveautomateddeviceforremotelycollaringandweighingmuledeer AT mathewwalldredge anoninvasiveautomateddeviceforremotelycollaringandweighingmuledeer AT danielpwalsh anoninvasiveautomateddeviceforremotelycollaringandweighingmuledeer AT ericjbergman anoninvasiveautomateddeviceforremotelycollaringandweighingmuledeer AT charlesrandersonjr anoninvasiveautomateddeviceforremotelycollaringandweighingmuledeer AT darlenekilpatrick anoninvasiveautomateddeviceforremotelycollaringandweighingmuledeer AT joebakel anoninvasiveautomateddeviceforremotelycollaringandweighingmuledeer AT christophefebvre anoninvasiveautomateddeviceforremotelycollaringandweighingmuledeer AT chadjbishop noninvasiveautomateddeviceforremotelycollaringandweighingmuledeer AT mathewwalldredge noninvasiveautomateddeviceforremotelycollaringandweighingmuledeer AT danielpwalsh noninvasiveautomateddeviceforremotelycollaringandweighingmuledeer AT ericjbergman noninvasiveautomateddeviceforremotelycollaringandweighingmuledeer AT charlesrandersonjr noninvasiveautomateddeviceforremotelycollaringandweighingmuledeer AT darlenekilpatrick noninvasiveautomateddeviceforremotelycollaringandweighingmuledeer AT joebakel noninvasiveautomateddeviceforremotelycollaringandweighingmuledeer AT christophefebvre noninvasiveautomateddeviceforremotelycollaringandweighingmuledeer |