Simplified segmental scleral buckling without localization and cryopexy: A retrospective comparison with conventional segmental scleral buckling

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to propose a simplified segmental scleral buckling (SSSB) technique that does not require break localization for less-experienced vitreoretinal surgeons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study compared the clinical results of 46 conventional and 23 SSSB (c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pei-Hsuan Lin, Yi-An Lee, Lu-Chun Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-12-01
Series:Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-23-00093
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841536549394579456
author Pei-Hsuan Lin
Yi-An Lee
Lu-Chun Wang
author_facet Pei-Hsuan Lin
Yi-An Lee
Lu-Chun Wang
author_sort Pei-Hsuan Lin
collection DOAJ
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to propose a simplified segmental scleral buckling (SSSB) technique that does not require break localization for less-experienced vitreoretinal surgeons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study compared the clinical results of 46 conventional and 23 SSSB (conventional segmental SB [CSSB] and SSSB, respectively) procedures in a tertiary referral retinal center in Taiwan between 2008 and 2019. In the CSSB group, breaks were localized during surgery. In the SSSB group, a wider sponge band and a longer scleral buckle were used to maximize the chances of sealing the retinal breaks based on the preoperative fundus examination findings and to minimize the positioning error caused by cyclotorsion, without performing indirect ophthalmoscopy. The primary outcome was assessed after 6 months. Patient characteristics, surgical parameters, and outcomes were compared between groups. The main outcomes were the duration of surgery, changes in visual acuity, primary success rate, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment recurrence rate, and the frequency of further laser photocoagulation. RESULTS: SSSB had a shorter duration than CSSB and was associated with more frequent use of longer and wider explants and need for further laser retinopexy. Both groups showed high primary success rates (95.65%). CONCLUSION: The primary success rates for the SSSB and CSSB groups were comparable and equally high. SSSB required laser retinopexy more frequently and was a shorter procedure.
format Article
id doaj-art-2e5e29a4e4eb484cb1e58b137c1d65c6
institution Kabale University
issn 2211-5056
2211-5072
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-2e5e29a4e4eb484cb1e58b137c1d65c62025-01-14T15:51:28ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsTaiwan Journal of Ophthalmology2211-50562211-50722024-12-0114458859310.4103/tjo.TJO-D-23-00093Simplified segmental scleral buckling without localization and cryopexy: A retrospective comparison with conventional segmental scleral bucklingPei-Hsuan LinYi-An LeeLu-Chun WangPURPOSE: The aim of this study was to propose a simplified segmental scleral buckling (SSSB) technique that does not require break localization for less-experienced vitreoretinal surgeons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study compared the clinical results of 46 conventional and 23 SSSB (conventional segmental SB [CSSB] and SSSB, respectively) procedures in a tertiary referral retinal center in Taiwan between 2008 and 2019. In the CSSB group, breaks were localized during surgery. In the SSSB group, a wider sponge band and a longer scleral buckle were used to maximize the chances of sealing the retinal breaks based on the preoperative fundus examination findings and to minimize the positioning error caused by cyclotorsion, without performing indirect ophthalmoscopy. The primary outcome was assessed after 6 months. Patient characteristics, surgical parameters, and outcomes were compared between groups. The main outcomes were the duration of surgery, changes in visual acuity, primary success rate, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment recurrence rate, and the frequency of further laser photocoagulation. RESULTS: SSSB had a shorter duration than CSSB and was associated with more frequent use of longer and wider explants and need for further laser retinopexy. Both groups showed high primary success rates (95.65%). CONCLUSION: The primary success rates for the SSSB and CSSB groups were comparable and equally high. SSSB required laser retinopexy more frequently and was a shorter procedure.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-23-00093cryopexyretinal detachmentscleral buckle
spellingShingle Pei-Hsuan Lin
Yi-An Lee
Lu-Chun Wang
Simplified segmental scleral buckling without localization and cryopexy: A retrospective comparison with conventional segmental scleral buckling
Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology
cryopexy
retinal detachment
scleral buckle
title Simplified segmental scleral buckling without localization and cryopexy: A retrospective comparison with conventional segmental scleral buckling
title_full Simplified segmental scleral buckling without localization and cryopexy: A retrospective comparison with conventional segmental scleral buckling
title_fullStr Simplified segmental scleral buckling without localization and cryopexy: A retrospective comparison with conventional segmental scleral buckling
title_full_unstemmed Simplified segmental scleral buckling without localization and cryopexy: A retrospective comparison with conventional segmental scleral buckling
title_short Simplified segmental scleral buckling without localization and cryopexy: A retrospective comparison with conventional segmental scleral buckling
title_sort simplified segmental scleral buckling without localization and cryopexy a retrospective comparison with conventional segmental scleral buckling
topic cryopexy
retinal detachment
scleral buckle
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-23-00093
work_keys_str_mv AT peihsuanlin simplifiedsegmentalscleralbucklingwithoutlocalizationandcryopexyaretrospectivecomparisonwithconventionalsegmentalscleralbuckling
AT yianlee simplifiedsegmentalscleralbucklingwithoutlocalizationandcryopexyaretrospectivecomparisonwithconventionalsegmentalscleralbuckling
AT luchunwang simplifiedsegmentalscleralbucklingwithoutlocalizationandcryopexyaretrospectivecomparisonwithconventionalsegmentalscleralbuckling