Randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery (LOTUS): a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trial
Objective To evaluate the feasibility of a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing oestrogen treatment with no oestrogen supplementation in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery.Design and setting A randomised, parallel, open, external pilot trial involving six UK urog...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020-09-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open |
Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e025141.full |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841556265516400640 |
---|---|
author | Jane Daniels Lee Middleton Tina Sara Verghese Versha Cheed Lisa Leighton Pallavi Manish Latthe |
author_facet | Jane Daniels Lee Middleton Tina Sara Verghese Versha Cheed Lisa Leighton Pallavi Manish Latthe |
author_sort | Jane Daniels |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objective To evaluate the feasibility of a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing oestrogen treatment with no oestrogen supplementation in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery.Design and setting A randomised, parallel, open, external pilot trial involving six UK urogynaecology centres (July 2015–August 2016).Participants Postmenopausal women with POP opting for surgery, unless involving mesh or for recurrent POP in same compartment.Intervention Women were randomised (1:1) to preoperative and postoperative oestrogen or no treatment. Oestrogen treatment (oestradiol hemihydrate 10 μg vaginal pessaries) commenced 6 weeks prior to surgery (once daily for 2 weeks, twice weekly for 4 weeks) and twice weekly for 26 weeks from 6 weeks postsurgery.Outcome measures The main outcomes were assessment of eligibility and recruitment rates along with compliance and data completion. To obtain estimates for important aspects of the protocol to allow development of a definitive trial.Results 325 women seeking POP surgery were screened over 13 months and 157 (48%) were eligible. Of these, 100 (64%) were randomised, 50 to oestrogen and 50 to no oestrogen treatment, with 89 (44/45 respectively) ultimately having surgery. Of these, 89% (79/89) returned complete questionnaires at 6 months and 78% (32/41) reported good compliance with oestrogen. No serious adverse events were attributable to oestrogen use.Conclusions A large multicentre RCT of oestrogen versus no treatment is feasible, as it is possible to randomise and follow up participants with high fidelity. Four predefined feasibility criteria were met. Compliance with treatment regimens is not a barrier. A larger trial is required to definitively address the role of perioperative oestrogen supplementation.Trial registration number ISRCTN46661996. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-2e4683ababde4611ae1dbb2868741dcd |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2044-6055 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020-09-01 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | Article |
series | BMJ Open |
spelling | doaj-art-2e4683ababde4611ae1dbb2868741dcd2025-01-07T10:20:08ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-09-0110910.1136/bmjopen-2018-025141Randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery (LOTUS): a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trialJane Daniels0Lee Middleton1Tina Sara Verghese2Versha Cheed3Lisa Leighton4Pallavi Manish Latthe5Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Nottingham, Nottingham, UK5 Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UKInstitute of Metabolism and System Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK5 Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UKBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKObstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UKObjective To evaluate the feasibility of a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing oestrogen treatment with no oestrogen supplementation in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery.Design and setting A randomised, parallel, open, external pilot trial involving six UK urogynaecology centres (July 2015–August 2016).Participants Postmenopausal women with POP opting for surgery, unless involving mesh or for recurrent POP in same compartment.Intervention Women were randomised (1:1) to preoperative and postoperative oestrogen or no treatment. Oestrogen treatment (oestradiol hemihydrate 10 μg vaginal pessaries) commenced 6 weeks prior to surgery (once daily for 2 weeks, twice weekly for 4 weeks) and twice weekly for 26 weeks from 6 weeks postsurgery.Outcome measures The main outcomes were assessment of eligibility and recruitment rates along with compliance and data completion. To obtain estimates for important aspects of the protocol to allow development of a definitive trial.Results 325 women seeking POP surgery were screened over 13 months and 157 (48%) were eligible. Of these, 100 (64%) were randomised, 50 to oestrogen and 50 to no oestrogen treatment, with 89 (44/45 respectively) ultimately having surgery. Of these, 89% (79/89) returned complete questionnaires at 6 months and 78% (32/41) reported good compliance with oestrogen. No serious adverse events were attributable to oestrogen use.Conclusions A large multicentre RCT of oestrogen versus no treatment is feasible, as it is possible to randomise and follow up participants with high fidelity. Four predefined feasibility criteria were met. Compliance with treatment regimens is not a barrier. A larger trial is required to definitively address the role of perioperative oestrogen supplementation.Trial registration number ISRCTN46661996.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e025141.full |
spellingShingle | Jane Daniels Lee Middleton Tina Sara Verghese Versha Cheed Lisa Leighton Pallavi Manish Latthe Randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery (LOTUS): a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trial BMJ Open |
title | Randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery (LOTUS): a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trial |
title_full | Randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery (LOTUS): a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trial |
title_fullStr | Randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery (LOTUS): a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery (LOTUS): a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trial |
title_short | Randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery (LOTUS): a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trial |
title_sort | randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery lotus a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trial |
url | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e025141.full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT janedaniels randomisedcontrolledtrialtoinvestigatetheeffectivenessoflocaloestrogentreatmentinpostmenopausalwomenundergoingpelvicorganprolapsesurgerylotusapilotstudytoassessfeasibilityofalargemulticentretrial AT leemiddleton randomisedcontrolledtrialtoinvestigatetheeffectivenessoflocaloestrogentreatmentinpostmenopausalwomenundergoingpelvicorganprolapsesurgerylotusapilotstudytoassessfeasibilityofalargemulticentretrial AT tinasaraverghese randomisedcontrolledtrialtoinvestigatetheeffectivenessoflocaloestrogentreatmentinpostmenopausalwomenundergoingpelvicorganprolapsesurgerylotusapilotstudytoassessfeasibilityofalargemulticentretrial AT vershacheed randomisedcontrolledtrialtoinvestigatetheeffectivenessoflocaloestrogentreatmentinpostmenopausalwomenundergoingpelvicorganprolapsesurgerylotusapilotstudytoassessfeasibilityofalargemulticentretrial AT lisaleighton randomisedcontrolledtrialtoinvestigatetheeffectivenessoflocaloestrogentreatmentinpostmenopausalwomenundergoingpelvicorganprolapsesurgerylotusapilotstudytoassessfeasibilityofalargemulticentretrial AT pallavimanishlatthe randomisedcontrolledtrialtoinvestigatetheeffectivenessoflocaloestrogentreatmentinpostmenopausalwomenundergoingpelvicorganprolapsesurgerylotusapilotstudytoassessfeasibilityofalargemulticentretrial |