Randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery (LOTUS): a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trial

Objective To evaluate the feasibility of a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing oestrogen treatment with no oestrogen supplementation in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery.Design and setting A randomised, parallel, open, external pilot trial involving six UK urog...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jane Daniels, Lee Middleton, Tina Sara Verghese, Versha Cheed, Lisa Leighton, Pallavi Manish Latthe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e025141.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841556265516400640
author Jane Daniels
Lee Middleton
Tina Sara Verghese
Versha Cheed
Lisa Leighton
Pallavi Manish Latthe
author_facet Jane Daniels
Lee Middleton
Tina Sara Verghese
Versha Cheed
Lisa Leighton
Pallavi Manish Latthe
author_sort Jane Daniels
collection DOAJ
description Objective To evaluate the feasibility of a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing oestrogen treatment with no oestrogen supplementation in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery.Design and setting A randomised, parallel, open, external pilot trial involving six UK urogynaecology centres (July 2015–August 2016).Participants Postmenopausal women with POP opting for surgery, unless involving mesh or for recurrent POP in same compartment.Intervention Women were randomised (1:1) to preoperative and postoperative oestrogen or no treatment. Oestrogen treatment (oestradiol hemihydrate 10 μg vaginal pessaries) commenced 6 weeks prior to surgery (once daily for 2 weeks, twice weekly for 4 weeks) and twice weekly for 26 weeks from 6 weeks postsurgery.Outcome measures The main outcomes were assessment of eligibility and recruitment rates along with compliance and data completion. To obtain estimates for important aspects of the protocol to allow development of a definitive trial.Results 325 women seeking POP surgery were screened over 13 months and 157 (48%) were eligible. Of these, 100 (64%) were randomised, 50 to oestrogen and 50 to no oestrogen treatment, with 89 (44/45 respectively) ultimately having surgery. Of these, 89% (79/89) returned complete questionnaires at 6 months and 78% (32/41) reported good compliance with oestrogen. No serious adverse events were attributable to oestrogen use.Conclusions A large multicentre RCT of oestrogen versus no treatment is feasible, as it is possible to randomise and follow up participants with high fidelity. Four predefined feasibility criteria were met. Compliance with treatment regimens is not a barrier. A larger trial is required to definitively address the role of perioperative oestrogen supplementation.Trial registration number ISRCTN46661996.
format Article
id doaj-art-2e4683ababde4611ae1dbb2868741dcd
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-2e4683ababde4611ae1dbb2868741dcd2025-01-07T10:20:08ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-09-0110910.1136/bmjopen-2018-025141Randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery (LOTUS): a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trialJane Daniels0Lee Middleton1Tina Sara Verghese2Versha Cheed3Lisa Leighton4Pallavi Manish Latthe5Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Nottingham, Nottingham, UK5 Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UKInstitute of Metabolism and System Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK5 Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UKBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKObstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UKObjective To evaluate the feasibility of a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing oestrogen treatment with no oestrogen supplementation in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery.Design and setting A randomised, parallel, open, external pilot trial involving six UK urogynaecology centres (July 2015–August 2016).Participants Postmenopausal women with POP opting for surgery, unless involving mesh or for recurrent POP in same compartment.Intervention Women were randomised (1:1) to preoperative and postoperative oestrogen or no treatment. Oestrogen treatment (oestradiol hemihydrate 10 μg vaginal pessaries) commenced 6 weeks prior to surgery (once daily for 2 weeks, twice weekly for 4 weeks) and twice weekly for 26 weeks from 6 weeks postsurgery.Outcome measures The main outcomes were assessment of eligibility and recruitment rates along with compliance and data completion. To obtain estimates for important aspects of the protocol to allow development of a definitive trial.Results 325 women seeking POP surgery were screened over 13 months and 157 (48%) were eligible. Of these, 100 (64%) were randomised, 50 to oestrogen and 50 to no oestrogen treatment, with 89 (44/45 respectively) ultimately having surgery. Of these, 89% (79/89) returned complete questionnaires at 6 months and 78% (32/41) reported good compliance with oestrogen. No serious adverse events were attributable to oestrogen use.Conclusions A large multicentre RCT of oestrogen versus no treatment is feasible, as it is possible to randomise and follow up participants with high fidelity. Four predefined feasibility criteria were met. Compliance with treatment regimens is not a barrier. A larger trial is required to definitively address the role of perioperative oestrogen supplementation.Trial registration number ISRCTN46661996.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e025141.full
spellingShingle Jane Daniels
Lee Middleton
Tina Sara Verghese
Versha Cheed
Lisa Leighton
Pallavi Manish Latthe
Randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery (LOTUS): a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trial
BMJ Open
title Randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery (LOTUS): a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trial
title_full Randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery (LOTUS): a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trial
title_fullStr Randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery (LOTUS): a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trial
title_full_unstemmed Randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery (LOTUS): a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trial
title_short Randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery (LOTUS): a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trial
title_sort randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery lotus a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trial
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e025141.full
work_keys_str_mv AT janedaniels randomisedcontrolledtrialtoinvestigatetheeffectivenessoflocaloestrogentreatmentinpostmenopausalwomenundergoingpelvicorganprolapsesurgerylotusapilotstudytoassessfeasibilityofalargemulticentretrial
AT leemiddleton randomisedcontrolledtrialtoinvestigatetheeffectivenessoflocaloestrogentreatmentinpostmenopausalwomenundergoingpelvicorganprolapsesurgerylotusapilotstudytoassessfeasibilityofalargemulticentretrial
AT tinasaraverghese randomisedcontrolledtrialtoinvestigatetheeffectivenessoflocaloestrogentreatmentinpostmenopausalwomenundergoingpelvicorganprolapsesurgerylotusapilotstudytoassessfeasibilityofalargemulticentretrial
AT vershacheed randomisedcontrolledtrialtoinvestigatetheeffectivenessoflocaloestrogentreatmentinpostmenopausalwomenundergoingpelvicorganprolapsesurgerylotusapilotstudytoassessfeasibilityofalargemulticentretrial
AT lisaleighton randomisedcontrolledtrialtoinvestigatetheeffectivenessoflocaloestrogentreatmentinpostmenopausalwomenundergoingpelvicorganprolapsesurgerylotusapilotstudytoassessfeasibilityofalargemulticentretrial
AT pallavimanishlatthe randomisedcontrolledtrialtoinvestigatetheeffectivenessoflocaloestrogentreatmentinpostmenopausalwomenundergoingpelvicorganprolapsesurgerylotusapilotstudytoassessfeasibilityofalargemulticentretrial