Head-to-head study of [18F]FAPI-04 PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT for non-invasive assessment of liver cancer and its immunohistochemical markers

Abstract Objective To compare the performance of [18F]FDG and [18F]FAPI-04 in PET/CT evaluation for liver cancer lesions, with a further exploration of the associations between PET semiquantitative data and immunohistochemical markers to liver cancer. Methods Patients with suspected malignant liver...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhiying Liang, Hao Peng, Wei Li, Zhidong Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-11-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13153-1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846165102418460672
author Zhiying Liang
Hao Peng
Wei Li
Zhidong Liu
author_facet Zhiying Liang
Hao Peng
Wei Li
Zhidong Liu
author_sort Zhiying Liang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective To compare the performance of [18F]FDG and [18F]FAPI-04 in PET/CT evaluation for liver cancer lesions, with a further exploration of the associations between PET semiquantitative data and immunohistochemical markers to liver cancer. Methods Patients with suspected malignant liver lesions (MLL) underwent [18F]FDG and [18F]FAPI-04 PET/CT scanning. Liver lesions were visually classified as positive or negative based on their uptake level exceeding that of adjacent normal liver tissue. SUVmax and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) were recorded for semi-quantitative analysis. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of each tracer were determined using pathological findings as the gold standard. Furthermore, immunohistochemical analysis provided the molecular characteristics of all MLLs. Comprehensive analysis explored correlations between these molecular markers and PET semiquantitative parameters (SUVmax andTBR) to identify potential associations. Results The study enrolled 44 patients, with 39 confirmed cases of MLL, comprising 28 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) and 11 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ICC). For MLL detection, [18F]FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG exhibited sensitivities of 84.6% (33/39) and 76.9% (30/39), specificitiesy of 60% (3/5) and 100%(5/5), and accuracy of 81.8% (36/44) and 79.5%(35/44). Across all liver lesions, [18F]FAPI-04 significantly surpassed [18F]FDG in SUVmax(10.54 ± 6.72 VS. 7.68 ± 6.79) and TBR(4.35 ± 3.78 Vs. 3.17 ± 3.05). Notably, [18F]FAPI-04 displayed markebly elevated SUVmax in benign liver lesions (BLLs) (P = 0.032), HCCs (P = 0.005), and ICCs (P = 0.011). Lesions with hepatocyte negativity (P = 0.023), CD34 negativity(P = 0.044), and high Ki67 expression (> 30%) (P = 0.001) had higher SUVmax on [18F]FAPI-04. Additionally, ARG-1-negative lesions demonstrated higher TBR on [18F]FAPI-04 than ARG-1-positive lesions(P = 0.018). No significant SUVmax/TBR differences were observed with [18F]FDG based on these markers. A linear relationship was identified between Ki67 scores and SUVmax of [18F]FAPI-04 (R = 0.603, P < 0.001). Conclusion [18F]FAPI-04 exhibits superior performance over [18F]FDG in PET/CT evaluation of liver cancer, characterized by increased sensitivity and SUVmax/TBR. Significant correlations with molecular markers, including Ki67, suggest [18F]FAPI-04’s potential for characterizing liver cancer subtypes and assessing tumor proliferation. However, further research is required to validate these findings and their clinical significance. Trial registration NCT05485792, Registered 01 August 2022.
format Article
id doaj-art-2db5e087bbdd42cd8281e81c97df3756
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2407
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Cancer
spelling doaj-art-2db5e087bbdd42cd8281e81c97df37562024-11-17T12:32:42ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072024-11-0124111110.1186/s12885-024-13153-1Head-to-head study of [18F]FAPI-04 PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT for non-invasive assessment of liver cancer and its immunohistochemical markersZhiying Liang0Hao Peng1Wei Li2Zhidong Liu3Department of Nuclear Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou Medical UniversityDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou Medical UniversityDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou Medical UniversityDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou Medical UniversityAbstract Objective To compare the performance of [18F]FDG and [18F]FAPI-04 in PET/CT evaluation for liver cancer lesions, with a further exploration of the associations between PET semiquantitative data and immunohistochemical markers to liver cancer. Methods Patients with suspected malignant liver lesions (MLL) underwent [18F]FDG and [18F]FAPI-04 PET/CT scanning. Liver lesions were visually classified as positive or negative based on their uptake level exceeding that of adjacent normal liver tissue. SUVmax and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) were recorded for semi-quantitative analysis. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of each tracer were determined using pathological findings as the gold standard. Furthermore, immunohistochemical analysis provided the molecular characteristics of all MLLs. Comprehensive analysis explored correlations between these molecular markers and PET semiquantitative parameters (SUVmax andTBR) to identify potential associations. Results The study enrolled 44 patients, with 39 confirmed cases of MLL, comprising 28 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) and 11 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ICC). For MLL detection, [18F]FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG exhibited sensitivities of 84.6% (33/39) and 76.9% (30/39), specificitiesy of 60% (3/5) and 100%(5/5), and accuracy of 81.8% (36/44) and 79.5%(35/44). Across all liver lesions, [18F]FAPI-04 significantly surpassed [18F]FDG in SUVmax(10.54 ± 6.72 VS. 7.68 ± 6.79) and TBR(4.35 ± 3.78 Vs. 3.17 ± 3.05). Notably, [18F]FAPI-04 displayed markebly elevated SUVmax in benign liver lesions (BLLs) (P = 0.032), HCCs (P = 0.005), and ICCs (P = 0.011). Lesions with hepatocyte negativity (P = 0.023), CD34 negativity(P = 0.044), and high Ki67 expression (> 30%) (P = 0.001) had higher SUVmax on [18F]FAPI-04. Additionally, ARG-1-negative lesions demonstrated higher TBR on [18F]FAPI-04 than ARG-1-positive lesions(P = 0.018). No significant SUVmax/TBR differences were observed with [18F]FDG based on these markers. A linear relationship was identified between Ki67 scores and SUVmax of [18F]FAPI-04 (R = 0.603, P < 0.001). Conclusion [18F]FAPI-04 exhibits superior performance over [18F]FDG in PET/CT evaluation of liver cancer, characterized by increased sensitivity and SUVmax/TBR. Significant correlations with molecular markers, including Ki67, suggest [18F]FAPI-04’s potential for characterizing liver cancer subtypes and assessing tumor proliferation. However, further research is required to validate these findings and their clinical significance. Trial registration NCT05485792, Registered 01 August 2022.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13153-1[18F]FDGFAPIPET/CTHepatocellular carcinomaIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinomaSUV
spellingShingle Zhiying Liang
Hao Peng
Wei Li
Zhidong Liu
Head-to-head study of [18F]FAPI-04 PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT for non-invasive assessment of liver cancer and its immunohistochemical markers
BMC Cancer
[18F]FDG
FAPI
PET/CT
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
SUV
title Head-to-head study of [18F]FAPI-04 PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT for non-invasive assessment of liver cancer and its immunohistochemical markers
title_full Head-to-head study of [18F]FAPI-04 PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT for non-invasive assessment of liver cancer and its immunohistochemical markers
title_fullStr Head-to-head study of [18F]FAPI-04 PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT for non-invasive assessment of liver cancer and its immunohistochemical markers
title_full_unstemmed Head-to-head study of [18F]FAPI-04 PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT for non-invasive assessment of liver cancer and its immunohistochemical markers
title_short Head-to-head study of [18F]FAPI-04 PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT for non-invasive assessment of liver cancer and its immunohistochemical markers
title_sort head to head study of 18f fapi 04 pet ct and 18f fdg pet ct for non invasive assessment of liver cancer and its immunohistochemical markers
topic [18F]FDG
FAPI
PET/CT
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
SUV
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13153-1
work_keys_str_mv AT zhiyingliang headtoheadstudyof18ffapi04petctand18ffdgpetctfornoninvasiveassessmentoflivercanceranditsimmunohistochemicalmarkers
AT haopeng headtoheadstudyof18ffapi04petctand18ffdgpetctfornoninvasiveassessmentoflivercanceranditsimmunohistochemicalmarkers
AT weili headtoheadstudyof18ffapi04petctand18ffdgpetctfornoninvasiveassessmentoflivercanceranditsimmunohistochemicalmarkers
AT zhidongliu headtoheadstudyof18ffapi04petctand18ffdgpetctfornoninvasiveassessmentoflivercanceranditsimmunohistochemicalmarkers