Mechanistic modelling of water–oxygen bubbly flow in horizontal pipes: Deviation analysis from experimental correlations and performance comparison with CFD

Two correlations have been considered in the literature (Martin et al., 1971 and Kim et al., 2001) for the computation of heat transfer in liquid–gas bubbly flow in horizontal pipes. Motivated by the benefits of these two correlations, we investigate the horizontal two-phase bubbly flow in a double-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Montadhar Guesmi, Johannes Manthey, Richard Schab, Simon Unz, Michael Beckmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-01-01
Series:International Journal of Thermofluids
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666202724004555
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841555660690423808
author Montadhar Guesmi
Johannes Manthey
Richard Schab
Simon Unz
Michael Beckmann
author_facet Montadhar Guesmi
Johannes Manthey
Richard Schab
Simon Unz
Michael Beckmann
author_sort Montadhar Guesmi
collection DOAJ
description Two correlations have been considered in the literature (Martin et al., 1971 and Kim et al., 2001) for the computation of heat transfer in liquid–gas bubbly flow in horizontal pipes. Motivated by the benefits of these two correlations, we investigate the horizontal two-phase bubbly flow in a double-pipe heat exchanger with inner diameter of d=21.6 mm and length L=16⋅d using the mechanistic one-dimensional cell model. The results of the model have been compared with the correlations to assess the two approaches considered. Firstly, the first approach was assumed, whereby the properties of water–oxygen mixture can be considered as those of a single pseudo-fluid. This was achieved by appropriately averaging the thermodynamic properties of the two involved phases. Secondly, the second approach was considered, whereby the properties of the liquid phase were used directly. This was done after it was realized that it had not been commonly addressed in the literature. The results demonstrate that this approach yields satisfactory heat transfer coefficients in the case of small gas fractions (up to 6%). Secondly, a similar study utilizing the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method based on the discrete phase method (DPM) is conducted, which has not been addressed in previous works for the heat transfer investigation. The findings indicate that the CFD method successfully recovers a highly accurate heat transfer estimation, with a slight improvement in heat transfer (up to 5%) with increasing gas fraction. The mechanistic model, being numerically inexpensive compared to CFD, can predict heat transfer and pressure drop with good agreement, proving its competitiveness. The results presented here are useful for understanding and optimizing heat loss in the cooling circuit of PEM electrolysis.
format Article
id doaj-art-2d01849ffe1d4cbb9db5622d8809f09b
institution Kabale University
issn 2666-2027
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series International Journal of Thermofluids
spelling doaj-art-2d01849ffe1d4cbb9db5622d8809f09b2025-01-08T04:53:37ZengElsevierInternational Journal of Thermofluids2666-20272025-01-0125101016Mechanistic modelling of water–oxygen bubbly flow in horizontal pipes: Deviation analysis from experimental correlations and performance comparison with CFDMontadhar Guesmi0Johannes Manthey1Richard Schab2Simon Unz3Michael Beckmann4Corresponding author.; TU Dresden, Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology, 01062 Dresden, GermanyTU Dresden, Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology, 01062 Dresden, GermanyTU Dresden, Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology, 01062 Dresden, GermanyTU Dresden, Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology, 01062 Dresden, GermanyTU Dresden, Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology, 01062 Dresden, GermanyTwo correlations have been considered in the literature (Martin et al., 1971 and Kim et al., 2001) for the computation of heat transfer in liquid–gas bubbly flow in horizontal pipes. Motivated by the benefits of these two correlations, we investigate the horizontal two-phase bubbly flow in a double-pipe heat exchanger with inner diameter of d=21.6 mm and length L=16⋅d using the mechanistic one-dimensional cell model. The results of the model have been compared with the correlations to assess the two approaches considered. Firstly, the first approach was assumed, whereby the properties of water–oxygen mixture can be considered as those of a single pseudo-fluid. This was achieved by appropriately averaging the thermodynamic properties of the two involved phases. Secondly, the second approach was considered, whereby the properties of the liquid phase were used directly. This was done after it was realized that it had not been commonly addressed in the literature. The results demonstrate that this approach yields satisfactory heat transfer coefficients in the case of small gas fractions (up to 6%). Secondly, a similar study utilizing the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method based on the discrete phase method (DPM) is conducted, which has not been addressed in previous works for the heat transfer investigation. The findings indicate that the CFD method successfully recovers a highly accurate heat transfer estimation, with a slight improvement in heat transfer (up to 5%) with increasing gas fraction. The mechanistic model, being numerically inexpensive compared to CFD, can predict heat transfer and pressure drop with good agreement, proving its competitiveness. The results presented here are useful for understanding and optimizing heat loss in the cooling circuit of PEM electrolysis.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666202724004555Two phase flowBubbly flowHeat transferPressure dropCFDMechanistic modelling
spellingShingle Montadhar Guesmi
Johannes Manthey
Richard Schab
Simon Unz
Michael Beckmann
Mechanistic modelling of water–oxygen bubbly flow in horizontal pipes: Deviation analysis from experimental correlations and performance comparison with CFD
International Journal of Thermofluids
Two phase flow
Bubbly flow
Heat transfer
Pressure drop
CFD
Mechanistic modelling
title Mechanistic modelling of water–oxygen bubbly flow in horizontal pipes: Deviation analysis from experimental correlations and performance comparison with CFD
title_full Mechanistic modelling of water–oxygen bubbly flow in horizontal pipes: Deviation analysis from experimental correlations and performance comparison with CFD
title_fullStr Mechanistic modelling of water–oxygen bubbly flow in horizontal pipes: Deviation analysis from experimental correlations and performance comparison with CFD
title_full_unstemmed Mechanistic modelling of water–oxygen bubbly flow in horizontal pipes: Deviation analysis from experimental correlations and performance comparison with CFD
title_short Mechanistic modelling of water–oxygen bubbly flow in horizontal pipes: Deviation analysis from experimental correlations and performance comparison with CFD
title_sort mechanistic modelling of water oxygen bubbly flow in horizontal pipes deviation analysis from experimental correlations and performance comparison with cfd
topic Two phase flow
Bubbly flow
Heat transfer
Pressure drop
CFD
Mechanistic modelling
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666202724004555
work_keys_str_mv AT montadharguesmi mechanisticmodellingofwateroxygenbubblyflowinhorizontalpipesdeviationanalysisfromexperimentalcorrelationsandperformancecomparisonwithcfd
AT johannesmanthey mechanisticmodellingofwateroxygenbubblyflowinhorizontalpipesdeviationanalysisfromexperimentalcorrelationsandperformancecomparisonwithcfd
AT richardschab mechanisticmodellingofwateroxygenbubblyflowinhorizontalpipesdeviationanalysisfromexperimentalcorrelationsandperformancecomparisonwithcfd
AT simonunz mechanisticmodellingofwateroxygenbubblyflowinhorizontalpipesdeviationanalysisfromexperimentalcorrelationsandperformancecomparisonwithcfd
AT michaelbeckmann mechanisticmodellingofwateroxygenbubblyflowinhorizontalpipesdeviationanalysisfromexperimentalcorrelationsandperformancecomparisonwithcfd