Phase 3 Study of Talazoparib Plus Enzalutamide Versus Placebo Plus Enzalutamide as First‐Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Castration‐Resistant Prostate Cancer: TALAPRO‐2 Japanese Subgroup Analysis

ABSTRACT Background In TALAPRO‐2, the poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase inhibitor talazoparib plus the androgen receptor–signaling inhibitor enzalutamide improved radiographic progression‐free survival (rPFS) versus placebo plus enzalutamide (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.51–0.78) in molecularly uns...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nobuaki Matsubara, Hideaki Miyake, Hiroji Uemura, Atsushi Mizokami, Hiroaki Kikukawa, Takeo Kosaka, Kazuo Nishimura, Motonobu Nakamura, Kazuki Kobayashi, Atsushi Komaru, Yuko Mori, Shigeyuki Toyoizumi, Natsuki Hori, Yoshiko Umeyama, Hirotsugu Uemura
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70333
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841543395655286784
author Nobuaki Matsubara
Hideaki Miyake
Hiroji Uemura
Atsushi Mizokami
Hiroaki Kikukawa
Takeo Kosaka
Kazuo Nishimura
Motonobu Nakamura
Kazuki Kobayashi
Atsushi Komaru
Yuko Mori
Shigeyuki Toyoizumi
Natsuki Hori
Yoshiko Umeyama
Hirotsugu Uemura
author_facet Nobuaki Matsubara
Hideaki Miyake
Hiroji Uemura
Atsushi Mizokami
Hiroaki Kikukawa
Takeo Kosaka
Kazuo Nishimura
Motonobu Nakamura
Kazuki Kobayashi
Atsushi Komaru
Yuko Mori
Shigeyuki Toyoizumi
Natsuki Hori
Yoshiko Umeyama
Hirotsugu Uemura
author_sort Nobuaki Matsubara
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Background In TALAPRO‐2, the poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase inhibitor talazoparib plus the androgen receptor–signaling inhibitor enzalutamide improved radiographic progression‐free survival (rPFS) versus placebo plus enzalutamide (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.51–0.78) in molecularly unselected patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We report an exploratory analysis of efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics in Japanese patients enrolled in the TALAPRO‐2 study. Methods The ongoing, multinational, randomized, double‐blind, phase 3 TALAPRO‐2 study enrolled patients with mCRPC receiving ongoing androgen deprivation therapy. Patients were prospectively assessed for homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations and randomized 1:1 to receive talazoparib or placebo plus enzalutamide once daily. The primary endpoint was rPFS by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included overall survival, objective response, safety, and pharmacokinetics. Results For the 116 Japanese all‐comers patients enrolled in TALAPRO‐2, the HR for rPFS was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.45–1.75) for the talazoparib versus placebo arm; among those with HRR‐deficient disease, the HR was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.16–2.20). Among patients with BRCA1/2 gene alterations in the HRR‐deficient population (n = 10), the HR for rPFS was < 0.01 (95% CI, < 0.01–not reached) for the talazoparib versus placebo arm. In the all‐comers population, the objective response rate by BICR was 55% (all complete responses) in the talazoparib arm versus 36% in the placebo arm. The safety profile of talazoparib plus enzalutamide was similar between Japanese patients and the overall all‐comers population; no new safety signals were identified. Anemia was the most common grade 3/4 treatment‐emergent adverse event (55%) and cause of talazoparib discontinuation (12%). Talazoparib Ctrough was comparable across Japanese, Asian, and non‐Asian subgroups. Conclusions In this exploratory analysis, efficacy outcomes with talazoparib plus enzalutamide in Japanese patients in TALAPRO‐2 were consistent with those in the overall all‐comers population. The safety profile and pharmacokinetics of the combination were similar between Japanese patients and the overall all‐comers population. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03395197
format Article
id doaj-art-2c9f88f6d1304bc88a05d52a931a4238
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-7634
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Medicine
spelling doaj-art-2c9f88f6d1304bc88a05d52a931a42382025-01-13T13:22:38ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342025-01-01141n/an/a10.1002/cam4.70333Phase 3 Study of Talazoparib Plus Enzalutamide Versus Placebo Plus Enzalutamide as First‐Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Castration‐Resistant Prostate Cancer: TALAPRO‐2 Japanese Subgroup AnalysisNobuaki Matsubara0Hideaki Miyake1Hiroji Uemura2Atsushi Mizokami3Hiroaki Kikukawa4Takeo Kosaka5Kazuo Nishimura6Motonobu Nakamura7Kazuki Kobayashi8Atsushi Komaru9Yuko Mori10Shigeyuki Toyoizumi11Natsuki Hori12Yoshiko Umeyama13Hirotsugu Uemura14National Cancer Center Hospital East Kashiwa JapanHamamatsu University School of Medicine Hamamatsu JapanYokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama JapanKanazawa University Hospital Kanazawa JapanKumamoto Medical Center Kumamoto JapanKeio University Hospital Tokyo JapanOsaka International Cancer Institute Osaka JapanKyushu Cancer Center Fukuoka JapanYokosuka Kyosai Hospital Yokosuka JapanChiba Cancer Center Chiba JapanPfizer R&D Japan Tokyo JapanPfizer R&D Japan Tokyo JapanPfizer R&D Japan Tokyo JapanPfizer R&D Japan Tokyo JapanKindai University Hospital Osaka JapanABSTRACT Background In TALAPRO‐2, the poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase inhibitor talazoparib plus the androgen receptor–signaling inhibitor enzalutamide improved radiographic progression‐free survival (rPFS) versus placebo plus enzalutamide (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.51–0.78) in molecularly unselected patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We report an exploratory analysis of efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics in Japanese patients enrolled in the TALAPRO‐2 study. Methods The ongoing, multinational, randomized, double‐blind, phase 3 TALAPRO‐2 study enrolled patients with mCRPC receiving ongoing androgen deprivation therapy. Patients were prospectively assessed for homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations and randomized 1:1 to receive talazoparib or placebo plus enzalutamide once daily. The primary endpoint was rPFS by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included overall survival, objective response, safety, and pharmacokinetics. Results For the 116 Japanese all‐comers patients enrolled in TALAPRO‐2, the HR for rPFS was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.45–1.75) for the talazoparib versus placebo arm; among those with HRR‐deficient disease, the HR was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.16–2.20). Among patients with BRCA1/2 gene alterations in the HRR‐deficient population (n = 10), the HR for rPFS was < 0.01 (95% CI, < 0.01–not reached) for the talazoparib versus placebo arm. In the all‐comers population, the objective response rate by BICR was 55% (all complete responses) in the talazoparib arm versus 36% in the placebo arm. The safety profile of talazoparib plus enzalutamide was similar between Japanese patients and the overall all‐comers population; no new safety signals were identified. Anemia was the most common grade 3/4 treatment‐emergent adverse event (55%) and cause of talazoparib discontinuation (12%). Talazoparib Ctrough was comparable across Japanese, Asian, and non‐Asian subgroups. Conclusions In this exploratory analysis, efficacy outcomes with talazoparib plus enzalutamide in Japanese patients in TALAPRO‐2 were consistent with those in the overall all‐comers population. The safety profile and pharmacokinetics of the combination were similar between Japanese patients and the overall all‐comers population. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03395197https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70333enzalutamideJapanesemCRPCPARP inhibitorTALAPRO‐2talazoparib
spellingShingle Nobuaki Matsubara
Hideaki Miyake
Hiroji Uemura
Atsushi Mizokami
Hiroaki Kikukawa
Takeo Kosaka
Kazuo Nishimura
Motonobu Nakamura
Kazuki Kobayashi
Atsushi Komaru
Yuko Mori
Shigeyuki Toyoizumi
Natsuki Hori
Yoshiko Umeyama
Hirotsugu Uemura
Phase 3 Study of Talazoparib Plus Enzalutamide Versus Placebo Plus Enzalutamide as First‐Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Castration‐Resistant Prostate Cancer: TALAPRO‐2 Japanese Subgroup Analysis
Cancer Medicine
enzalutamide
Japanese
mCRPC
PARP inhibitor
TALAPRO‐2
talazoparib
title Phase 3 Study of Talazoparib Plus Enzalutamide Versus Placebo Plus Enzalutamide as First‐Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Castration‐Resistant Prostate Cancer: TALAPRO‐2 Japanese Subgroup Analysis
title_full Phase 3 Study of Talazoparib Plus Enzalutamide Versus Placebo Plus Enzalutamide as First‐Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Castration‐Resistant Prostate Cancer: TALAPRO‐2 Japanese Subgroup Analysis
title_fullStr Phase 3 Study of Talazoparib Plus Enzalutamide Versus Placebo Plus Enzalutamide as First‐Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Castration‐Resistant Prostate Cancer: TALAPRO‐2 Japanese Subgroup Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Phase 3 Study of Talazoparib Plus Enzalutamide Versus Placebo Plus Enzalutamide as First‐Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Castration‐Resistant Prostate Cancer: TALAPRO‐2 Japanese Subgroup Analysis
title_short Phase 3 Study of Talazoparib Plus Enzalutamide Versus Placebo Plus Enzalutamide as First‐Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Castration‐Resistant Prostate Cancer: TALAPRO‐2 Japanese Subgroup Analysis
title_sort phase 3 study of talazoparib plus enzalutamide versus placebo plus enzalutamide as first line treatment in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer talapro 2 japanese subgroup analysis
topic enzalutamide
Japanese
mCRPC
PARP inhibitor
TALAPRO‐2
talazoparib
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70333
work_keys_str_mv AT nobuakimatsubara phase3studyoftalazoparibplusenzalutamideversusplaceboplusenzalutamideasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertalapro2japanesesubgroupanalysis
AT hideakimiyake phase3studyoftalazoparibplusenzalutamideversusplaceboplusenzalutamideasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertalapro2japanesesubgroupanalysis
AT hirojiuemura phase3studyoftalazoparibplusenzalutamideversusplaceboplusenzalutamideasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertalapro2japanesesubgroupanalysis
AT atsushimizokami phase3studyoftalazoparibplusenzalutamideversusplaceboplusenzalutamideasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertalapro2japanesesubgroupanalysis
AT hiroakikikukawa phase3studyoftalazoparibplusenzalutamideversusplaceboplusenzalutamideasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertalapro2japanesesubgroupanalysis
AT takeokosaka phase3studyoftalazoparibplusenzalutamideversusplaceboplusenzalutamideasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertalapro2japanesesubgroupanalysis
AT kazuonishimura phase3studyoftalazoparibplusenzalutamideversusplaceboplusenzalutamideasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertalapro2japanesesubgroupanalysis
AT motonobunakamura phase3studyoftalazoparibplusenzalutamideversusplaceboplusenzalutamideasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertalapro2japanesesubgroupanalysis
AT kazukikobayashi phase3studyoftalazoparibplusenzalutamideversusplaceboplusenzalutamideasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertalapro2japanesesubgroupanalysis
AT atsushikomaru phase3studyoftalazoparibplusenzalutamideversusplaceboplusenzalutamideasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertalapro2japanesesubgroupanalysis
AT yukomori phase3studyoftalazoparibplusenzalutamideversusplaceboplusenzalutamideasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertalapro2japanesesubgroupanalysis
AT shigeyukitoyoizumi phase3studyoftalazoparibplusenzalutamideversusplaceboplusenzalutamideasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertalapro2japanesesubgroupanalysis
AT natsukihori phase3studyoftalazoparibplusenzalutamideversusplaceboplusenzalutamideasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertalapro2japanesesubgroupanalysis
AT yoshikoumeyama phase3studyoftalazoparibplusenzalutamideversusplaceboplusenzalutamideasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertalapro2japanesesubgroupanalysis
AT hirotsuguuemura phase3studyoftalazoparibplusenzalutamideversusplaceboplusenzalutamideasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertalapro2japanesesubgroupanalysis