Evaluations of Virtual Defendants With Depleted or Rich Contextual Information

With the rapid flip to virtual courts in 2020, justice contexts changed dramatically. Suddenly, the courtroom looked very different: Courtroom architecture was replaced with personal devices and people were constrained to presenting themselves through modalities such as video and audio. Remote commu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bethany Muir, Eryn Newman, Meredith Rossner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2024-11-01
Series:Tilburg Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://account.tilburglawreview.com/index.php/up-j-tlr/article/view/388
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846114793224667136
author Bethany Muir
Eryn Newman
Meredith Rossner
author_facet Bethany Muir
Eryn Newman
Meredith Rossner
author_sort Bethany Muir
collection DOAJ
description With the rapid flip to virtual courts in 2020, justice contexts changed dramatically. Suddenly, the courtroom looked very different: Courtroom architecture was replaced with personal devices and people were constrained to presenting themselves through modalities such as video and audio. Remote communications also introduced other extralegal factors, including background cues indicating the location from which the attendee is joining, which has raised concerns regarding the potential for such cues to jeopardize the fairness of a trial. In this paper we present a series of experiments to test the impact of presentation modality and visual background cues. Across two experiments (total N = 608), we varied whether defendants appeared in front of custodial, home, or neutral contextual backgrounds. We also varied whether defendants appeared via video or a static image. We asked participants to rate perceived guilt and trustworthiness (or dangerousness in Experiment 2) of the defendant. We found that custodial backgrounds led to less favorable evaluations than home and neutral contextual backgrounds. Further, if defendants appeared with a static image, they were evaluated less favorably than if they appeared via video. This research provides insights into how access to contextual backgrounds and dynamic social cues may influence impressions in virtual justice contexts and raises questions about equity, policy, and procedure.
format Article
id doaj-art-2c4b3eda0ba844b7905efed205d52736
institution Kabale University
issn 2211-2545
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format Article
series Tilburg Law Review
spelling doaj-art-2c4b3eda0ba844b7905efed205d527362024-12-20T07:35:58ZengUbiquity PressTilburg Law Review2211-25452024-11-01292105–124105–12410.5334/tilr.388388Evaluations of Virtual Defendants With Depleted or Rich Contextual InformationBethany Muir0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1981-6945Eryn Newman1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8663-7173Meredith Rossner2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4744-8502The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital TerritoryThe Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital TerritoryThe Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital TerritoryWith the rapid flip to virtual courts in 2020, justice contexts changed dramatically. Suddenly, the courtroom looked very different: Courtroom architecture was replaced with personal devices and people were constrained to presenting themselves through modalities such as video and audio. Remote communications also introduced other extralegal factors, including background cues indicating the location from which the attendee is joining, which has raised concerns regarding the potential for such cues to jeopardize the fairness of a trial. In this paper we present a series of experiments to test the impact of presentation modality and visual background cues. Across two experiments (total N = 608), we varied whether defendants appeared in front of custodial, home, or neutral contextual backgrounds. We also varied whether defendants appeared via video or a static image. We asked participants to rate perceived guilt and trustworthiness (or dangerousness in Experiment 2) of the defendant. We found that custodial backgrounds led to less favorable evaluations than home and neutral contextual backgrounds. Further, if defendants appeared with a static image, they were evaluated less favorably than if they appeared via video. This research provides insights into how access to contextual backgrounds and dynamic social cues may influence impressions in virtual justice contexts and raises questions about equity, policy, and procedure.https://account.tilburglawreview.com/index.php/up-j-tlr/article/view/388remote courtsvideo backgroundsjuror decisionscognitive biasdefendant impressions
spellingShingle Bethany Muir
Eryn Newman
Meredith Rossner
Evaluations of Virtual Defendants With Depleted or Rich Contextual Information
Tilburg Law Review
remote courts
video backgrounds
juror decisions
cognitive bias
defendant impressions
title Evaluations of Virtual Defendants With Depleted or Rich Contextual Information
title_full Evaluations of Virtual Defendants With Depleted or Rich Contextual Information
title_fullStr Evaluations of Virtual Defendants With Depleted or Rich Contextual Information
title_full_unstemmed Evaluations of Virtual Defendants With Depleted or Rich Contextual Information
title_short Evaluations of Virtual Defendants With Depleted or Rich Contextual Information
title_sort evaluations of virtual defendants with depleted or rich contextual information
topic remote courts
video backgrounds
juror decisions
cognitive bias
defendant impressions
url https://account.tilburglawreview.com/index.php/up-j-tlr/article/view/388
work_keys_str_mv AT bethanymuir evaluationsofvirtualdefendantswithdepletedorrichcontextualinformation
AT erynnewman evaluationsofvirtualdefendantswithdepletedorrichcontextualinformation
AT meredithrossner evaluationsofvirtualdefendantswithdepletedorrichcontextualinformation