A new approach to classification of Metonymy and figurative images
Before producing speech, human beings create an image of the concept of what is to be said in their minds. A host of these conceptions form ideas in our minds but the image and concept are prior to these ideas and it is through reviewing, simile, comparison, analogy, and recurrent associations of th...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Semnan University
2012-06-01
|
Series: | مطالعات زبانی و بلاغی |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://rhetorical.semnan.ac.ir/article_1815_504270d1c10bb0b2841b1a403286abb7.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841527663307522048 |
---|---|
author | قهرمان شیری |
author_facet | قهرمان شیری |
author_sort | قهرمان شیری |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Before producing speech, human beings create an image of the concept of what is to be said in their minds. A host of these conceptions form ideas in our minds but the image and concept are prior to these ideas and it is through reviewing, simile, comparison, analogy, and recurrent associations of the same images that we conceive an idea. Therefore, seeing precedes thinking and thinking that comes with conception and visualization precedes speech. So we have: picture concept thinking speaking. Accordingly the popular saying, âOh Brother youâre the very thinkingâ has something before it, i.e. image and visualization and something after it, i.e. language and speech. If metaphor, simile, allegory, and symbol are related to the domain of image, concept, and visualization, all types of metonymyâexcept for resemblanceâare specifically discussed in the arena of language. This paper seeks to offer a different categorization of metonymy and the author has meant to encompass multiple types of metonymy in this smaller and more manageable category: concomitant metonymy, metonymy of proximity, and metonymy of resemblance. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-2bc7b1d064bf48c3842345a90f6698d1 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2008-9570 2717-090X |
language | fas |
publishDate | 2012-06-01 |
publisher | Semnan University |
record_format | Article |
series | مطالعات زبانی و بلاغی |
spelling | doaj-art-2bc7b1d064bf48c3842345a90f6698d12025-01-15T08:12:24ZfasSemnan Universityمطالعات زبانی و بلاغی2008-95702717-090X2012-06-013512114210.22075/jlrs.2017.18151815A new approach to classification of Metonymy and figurative imagesقهرمان شیریBefore producing speech, human beings create an image of the concept of what is to be said in their minds. A host of these conceptions form ideas in our minds but the image and concept are prior to these ideas and it is through reviewing, simile, comparison, analogy, and recurrent associations of the same images that we conceive an idea. Therefore, seeing precedes thinking and thinking that comes with conception and visualization precedes speech. So we have: picture concept thinking speaking. Accordingly the popular saying, âOh Brother youâre the very thinkingâ has something before it, i.e. image and visualization and something after it, i.e. language and speech. If metaphor, simile, allegory, and symbol are related to the domain of image, concept, and visualization, all types of metonymyâexcept for resemblanceâare specifically discussed in the arena of language. This paper seeks to offer a different categorization of metonymy and the author has meant to encompass multiple types of metonymy in this smaller and more manageable category: concomitant metonymy, metonymy of proximity, and metonymy of resemblance.https://rhetorical.semnan.ac.ir/article_1815_504270d1c10bb0b2841b1a403286abb7.pdfprophetic metonymytypes of metonymyconcomitant metonymymetonymy of proximityand metonymy of resemblance |
spellingShingle | قهرمان شیری A new approach to classification of Metonymy and figurative images مطالعات زبانی و بلاغی prophetic metonymy types of metonymy concomitant metonymy metonymy of proximity and metonymy of resemblance |
title | A new approach to classification of Metonymy and figurative images |
title_full | A new approach to classification of Metonymy and figurative images |
title_fullStr | A new approach to classification of Metonymy and figurative images |
title_full_unstemmed | A new approach to classification of Metonymy and figurative images |
title_short | A new approach to classification of Metonymy and figurative images |
title_sort | new approach to classification of metonymy and figurative images |
topic | prophetic metonymy types of metonymy concomitant metonymy metonymy of proximity and metonymy of resemblance |
url | https://rhetorical.semnan.ac.ir/article_1815_504270d1c10bb0b2841b1a403286abb7.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qhrmạnsẖyry anewapproachtoclassificationofmetonymyandfigurativeimages AT qhrmạnsẖyry newapproachtoclassificationofmetonymyandfigurativeimages |