Thematic reviews of patient safety incidents as a tool for systems thinking: a quality improvement report
Ensuring organisations learn from patient safety incidents is a key aim for healthcare organisations. The role that human factors and systems thinking can have to enable organisations learn from incidents is well acknowledged. A systems approach can help organisations focus less on individual fallib...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023-06-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Open Quality |
| Online Access: | https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/12/2/e002020.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846118057854894080 |
|---|---|
| author | Samantha Machen |
| author_facet | Samantha Machen |
| author_sort | Samantha Machen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Ensuring organisations learn from patient safety incidents is a key aim for healthcare organisations. The role that human factors and systems thinking can have to enable organisations learn from incidents is well acknowledged. A systems approach can help organisations focus less on individual fallibility and more on setting up resilient and safe systems. Investigation of incidents has previously been rooted in reductionist methodologies, for example, seeking to find the ‘root cause’ to individual incidents. While healthcare has embraced, in some contexts, the option for system-based methodologies—for example, SEIPS and Accimaps—these methodologies and frameworks still operate from a single incident perspective. It has long been acknowledged that healthcare organisations should focus on near misses and low harms with the same emphasis as incidents resulting in high harm. However, logistically, investigating all incidents in the same way is difficult. This paper puts forward an argument for themed reviews of patient safety incidents and provides an illustrative template for theming incidents using a human factors classification tool. This allows groups of incidents relating to the same portfolio, for example, medication errors, falls, pressure ulcer, diagnostic error, to be analysed at the same time and result in recommendations based on a larger sample size of incidents and based on a systems approach. This paper will present extracts of the themed review template trialled and argues that thematic reviews, in this context, allowed for a better understanding of the system of safety around the mismanagement of the deteriorating patient. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-2a77670920f24b649ab09a5d9f09e056 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2399-6641 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-06-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMJ Open Quality |
| spelling | doaj-art-2a77670920f24b649ab09a5d9f09e0562024-12-18T07:55:10ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open Quality2399-66412023-06-0112210.1136/bmjoq-2022-002020Thematic reviews of patient safety incidents as a tool for systems thinking: a quality improvement reportSamantha Machen0Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UKEnsuring organisations learn from patient safety incidents is a key aim for healthcare organisations. The role that human factors and systems thinking can have to enable organisations learn from incidents is well acknowledged. A systems approach can help organisations focus less on individual fallibility and more on setting up resilient and safe systems. Investigation of incidents has previously been rooted in reductionist methodologies, for example, seeking to find the ‘root cause’ to individual incidents. While healthcare has embraced, in some contexts, the option for system-based methodologies—for example, SEIPS and Accimaps—these methodologies and frameworks still operate from a single incident perspective. It has long been acknowledged that healthcare organisations should focus on near misses and low harms with the same emphasis as incidents resulting in high harm. However, logistically, investigating all incidents in the same way is difficult. This paper puts forward an argument for themed reviews of patient safety incidents and provides an illustrative template for theming incidents using a human factors classification tool. This allows groups of incidents relating to the same portfolio, for example, medication errors, falls, pressure ulcer, diagnostic error, to be analysed at the same time and result in recommendations based on a larger sample size of incidents and based on a systems approach. This paper will present extracts of the themed review template trialled and argues that thematic reviews, in this context, allowed for a better understanding of the system of safety around the mismanagement of the deteriorating patient.https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/12/2/e002020.full |
| spellingShingle | Samantha Machen Thematic reviews of patient safety incidents as a tool for systems thinking: a quality improvement report BMJ Open Quality |
| title | Thematic reviews of patient safety incidents as a tool for systems thinking: a quality improvement report |
| title_full | Thematic reviews of patient safety incidents as a tool for systems thinking: a quality improvement report |
| title_fullStr | Thematic reviews of patient safety incidents as a tool for systems thinking: a quality improvement report |
| title_full_unstemmed | Thematic reviews of patient safety incidents as a tool for systems thinking: a quality improvement report |
| title_short | Thematic reviews of patient safety incidents as a tool for systems thinking: a quality improvement report |
| title_sort | thematic reviews of patient safety incidents as a tool for systems thinking a quality improvement report |
| url | https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/12/2/e002020.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT samanthamachen thematicreviewsofpatientsafetyincidentsasatoolforsystemsthinkingaqualityimprovementreport |