Role of Forest Resources to Local Livelihoods: The Case of East Mau Forest Ecosystem, Kenya
Forests in Kenya are threatened by unsustainable uses and conversion to alternative land uses. In spite of the consequences of forest degradation and biodiversity loss and reliance of communities on forests livelihoods, there is little empirical data on the role of forest resources in livelihoods of...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2016-01-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Forestry Research |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4537354 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841524520689598464 |
|---|---|
| author | D. K. Langat E. K. Maranga A. A. Aboud J. K. Cheboiwo |
| author_facet | D. K. Langat E. K. Maranga A. A. Aboud J. K. Cheboiwo |
| author_sort | D. K. Langat |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Forests in Kenya are threatened by unsustainable uses and conversion to alternative land uses. In spite of the consequences of forest degradation and biodiversity loss and reliance of communities on forests livelihoods, there is little empirical data on the role of forest resources in livelihoods of the local communities. Socioeconomic, demographic, and forest use data were obtained by interviewing 367 households. Forest product market survey was undertaken to determine prices of various forest products for valuation of forest use. Forest income was significant to households contributing 33% of total household income. Fuel wood contributed 50%, food (27%), construction material (18%), and fodder, and thatching material 5% to household forest income. Absolute forest income and relative forest income (%) were not significantly different across study locations and between ethnic groups. However, absolute forest income and relative forest income (%) were significantly different among wealth classes. Poor households were more dependent on forests resources. However, in absolute terms, the rich households derived higher forest income. These results provide valuable information on the role of forest resources to livelihoods and could be applied in developing forest conservation policies for enhanced ecosystem services and livelihoods. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-29c0987394c24df496e8590cca617601 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1687-9368 1687-9376 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Forestry Research |
| spelling | doaj-art-29c0987394c24df496e8590cca6176012025-02-03T05:53:00ZengWileyInternational Journal of Forestry Research1687-93681687-93762016-01-01201610.1155/2016/45373544537354Role of Forest Resources to Local Livelihoods: The Case of East Mau Forest Ecosystem, KenyaD. K. Langat0E. K. Maranga1A. A. Aboud2J. K. Cheboiwo3Kenya Forestry Research Institute, P.O. Box 5199, Kisumu 40108, KenyaDepartment of Natural Resources, Egerton University, P.O. Box 536, Njoro 20115, KenyaDepartment of Natural Resources, Egerton University, P.O. Box 536, Njoro 20115, KenyaKenya Forestry Research Institute, P.O. Box 20412, Nairobi 00200, KenyaForests in Kenya are threatened by unsustainable uses and conversion to alternative land uses. In spite of the consequences of forest degradation and biodiversity loss and reliance of communities on forests livelihoods, there is little empirical data on the role of forest resources in livelihoods of the local communities. Socioeconomic, demographic, and forest use data were obtained by interviewing 367 households. Forest product market survey was undertaken to determine prices of various forest products for valuation of forest use. Forest income was significant to households contributing 33% of total household income. Fuel wood contributed 50%, food (27%), construction material (18%), and fodder, and thatching material 5% to household forest income. Absolute forest income and relative forest income (%) were not significantly different across study locations and between ethnic groups. However, absolute forest income and relative forest income (%) were significantly different among wealth classes. Poor households were more dependent on forests resources. However, in absolute terms, the rich households derived higher forest income. These results provide valuable information on the role of forest resources to livelihoods and could be applied in developing forest conservation policies for enhanced ecosystem services and livelihoods.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4537354 |
| spellingShingle | D. K. Langat E. K. Maranga A. A. Aboud J. K. Cheboiwo Role of Forest Resources to Local Livelihoods: The Case of East Mau Forest Ecosystem, Kenya International Journal of Forestry Research |
| title | Role of Forest Resources to Local Livelihoods: The Case of East Mau Forest Ecosystem, Kenya |
| title_full | Role of Forest Resources to Local Livelihoods: The Case of East Mau Forest Ecosystem, Kenya |
| title_fullStr | Role of Forest Resources to Local Livelihoods: The Case of East Mau Forest Ecosystem, Kenya |
| title_full_unstemmed | Role of Forest Resources to Local Livelihoods: The Case of East Mau Forest Ecosystem, Kenya |
| title_short | Role of Forest Resources to Local Livelihoods: The Case of East Mau Forest Ecosystem, Kenya |
| title_sort | role of forest resources to local livelihoods the case of east mau forest ecosystem kenya |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4537354 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dklangat roleofforestresourcestolocallivelihoodsthecaseofeastmauforestecosystemkenya AT ekmaranga roleofforestresourcestolocallivelihoodsthecaseofeastmauforestecosystemkenya AT aaaboud roleofforestresourcestolocallivelihoodsthecaseofeastmauforestecosystemkenya AT jkcheboiwo roleofforestresourcestolocallivelihoodsthecaseofeastmauforestecosystemkenya |