La viande rouge : un critère de virilité dans la Rome antique ? IIe siècle-IIe siècle ap. J.-C.)

Unlike the contemporary period, red meat had no special relationship with manliness in ancient Rome. Centred on self-control, and not on strength, Roman manliness had nothing to do with a food, otherwise deprecated, which contributed nothing in this field. As the embodiment of civilization, the vir...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Christophe Badel
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Association Mnémosyne 2024-12-01
Series:Genre & Histoire
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/genrehistoire/9707
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841551210062020608
author Christophe Badel
author_facet Christophe Badel
author_sort Christophe Badel
collection DOAJ
description Unlike the contemporary period, red meat had no special relationship with manliness in ancient Rome. Centred on self-control, and not on strength, Roman manliness had nothing to do with a food, otherwise deprecated, which contributed nothing in this field. As the embodiment of civilization, the vir had no attraction for a matter gorged with blood that placed it on the side of nature and rawness. In terms of taste, Roman males preferred white meat, which was the delight of aristocratic banquets. According to doctors, red meat was more dangerous for women than for men, but they also advised men not to consume it. On the subject, there was no symmetrical opposition between the two genres, but rather a gradient on a common continuum of negative nature.
format Article
id doaj-art-2756e1e826fa4cb8a5d9ebc6e83cac16
institution Kabale University
issn 2102-5886
language fra
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Association Mnémosyne
record_format Article
series Genre & Histoire
spelling doaj-art-2756e1e826fa4cb8a5d9ebc6e83cac162025-01-09T16:23:32ZfraAssociation MnémosyneGenre & Histoire2102-58862024-12-013410.4000/12ykrLa viande rouge : un critère de virilité dans la Rome antique ? IIe siècle-IIe siècle ap. J.-C.)Christophe BadelUnlike the contemporary period, red meat had no special relationship with manliness in ancient Rome. Centred on self-control, and not on strength, Roman manliness had nothing to do with a food, otherwise deprecated, which contributed nothing in this field. As the embodiment of civilization, the vir had no attraction for a matter gorged with blood that placed it on the side of nature and rawness. In terms of taste, Roman males preferred white meat, which was the delight of aristocratic banquets. According to doctors, red meat was more dangerous for women than for men, but they also advised men not to consume it. On the subject, there was no symmetrical opposition between the two genres, but rather a gradient on a common continuum of negative nature.https://journals.openedition.org/genrehistoire/9707RomeBloodRed MeatVirtusManliness
spellingShingle Christophe Badel
La viande rouge : un critère de virilité dans la Rome antique ? IIe siècle-IIe siècle ap. J.-C.)
Genre & Histoire
Rome
Blood
Red Meat
Virtus
Manliness
title La viande rouge : un critère de virilité dans la Rome antique ? IIe siècle-IIe siècle ap. J.-C.)
title_full La viande rouge : un critère de virilité dans la Rome antique ? IIe siècle-IIe siècle ap. J.-C.)
title_fullStr La viande rouge : un critère de virilité dans la Rome antique ? IIe siècle-IIe siècle ap. J.-C.)
title_full_unstemmed La viande rouge : un critère de virilité dans la Rome antique ? IIe siècle-IIe siècle ap. J.-C.)
title_short La viande rouge : un critère de virilité dans la Rome antique ? IIe siècle-IIe siècle ap. J.-C.)
title_sort la viande rouge un critere de virilite dans la rome antique iie siecle iie siecle ap j c
topic Rome
Blood
Red Meat
Virtus
Manliness
url https://journals.openedition.org/genrehistoire/9707
work_keys_str_mv AT christophebadel lavianderougeuncriteredevirilitedanslaromeantiqueiiesiecleiiesiecleapjc