Validation of Medication Proxies for the Identification of Hospitalizations for Major Adverse Cerebro-Cardiovascular Events
Dennis Steenhuis, Xuechun Li, Talitha L Feenstra, Eelko Hak Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Unit of Pharmacotherapy, Epidemiology & Economics, University of Groningen, Groningen, the NetherlandsCorrespondence: Dennis Steenhuis, PhD Research Fellow, Groningen Research Institute of Pharm...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Dove Medical Press
2025-03-01
|
| Series: | Clinical Epidemiology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.dovepress.com/validation-of-medication-proxies-for-the-identification-of-hospitaliza-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-CLEP |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Dennis Steenhuis, Xuechun Li, Talitha L Feenstra, Eelko Hak Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Unit of Pharmacotherapy, Epidemiology & Economics, University of Groningen, Groningen, the NetherlandsCorrespondence: Dennis Steenhuis, PhD Research Fellow, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Unit of PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology and Economics, University of Groningen, A. Deusinglaan 1, Groningen, 9713 AV, the Netherlands, Tel +31 6 8200 4471, Email d.steenhuis@rug.nlPurpose: To date, complete and long-term registrations of diseases and events are not available in every situation. As a useful proxy, medication usage data is very promising. For instance, real-world dispensing data from pharmacies are attractive because of the high validity of drug dispensing data, large sample sizes, and long-term registration. However, before application as a proxy, validity must be assessed. Therefore, in this study, we aim to assess the validity of various medicines used as a proxy for major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events (MACCE), that is, to identify an incident or previous hospitalization for a MACCE.Patients and Methods: Using the claims database of a large Dutch healthcare insurer, we estimated the concordance between hospitalization claims for MACCE and specific claims for dispensings to treat MACCE in a cohort of patients on primary preventive antihypertensive and/or antihyperlipidemic therapy between 2013 and 2020.Results: In a cohort of more than 110,000 patients, a dispensing of either vitamin K antagonists, platelet aggregation inhibitors, or nitrates was predictive of an incident hospitalization for a MACCE between 2013 and 2020, with a sensitivity of 71.5% (95% CI: 70.4– 72.5%) and specificity of 93.2% (95% CI 91.1– 93.4%), and any history of hospitalization for a MACCE (prevalence) with a sensitivity of 86.9% (95% CI: 86.5– 87.3%) and specificity of 81.9 (956% CI: 81.6– 82.1%), while positive predicted value remains low. Sensitivity analyses across age, sex, and patients with asthma/COPD or diabetes showed a similarly good performance.Conclusion: Claims for the dispensings of vitamin K antagonists, platelet aggregation inhibitors, and/or nitrates can be validly used as a proxy for new and previous hospitalization for MACCE in patients on primary preventive therapy. Further study is required to assess the validity of such dispensing claims for non-hospitalized cerebro-cardiovascular events and whether the results are generalizable in non-Dutch cohorts.Keywords: health insurance claims, cardiovascular events, sensitivity and specificity, pharmaceutical cost groups |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1179-1349 |