Demographic influences on Lithuanian physicians’ attitudes toward medical assistance in dying: a cross-sectional study

BackgroundThe topic of end-of-life decisions is important due to aging populations and the rising number of terminal illnesses like cancer. As more people experience suffering, the ethical, medical, and legal debates of these decisions become significant to healthcare policy. Understanding medical p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benedikt Bachmetjev, Artur Airapetian, Marija Jakubauskienė, Rolandas Zablockis, Asta Čekanauskaitė
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1507790/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841556703056756736
author Benedikt Bachmetjev
Artur Airapetian
Marija Jakubauskienė
Rolandas Zablockis
Asta Čekanauskaitė
author_facet Benedikt Bachmetjev
Artur Airapetian
Marija Jakubauskienė
Rolandas Zablockis
Asta Čekanauskaitė
author_sort Benedikt Bachmetjev
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundThe topic of end-of-life decisions is important due to aging populations and the rising number of terminal illnesses like cancer. As more people experience suffering, the ethical, medical, and legal debates of these decisions become significant to healthcare policy. Understanding medical professionals’ attitudes is critical for shaping responsible practices and legislation surrounding end-of-life care.MethodsThis cross-sectional study explores the attitudes of Lithuanian physicians toward medical assistance in dying (MAID), including euthanasia and assisted suicide (E/PAS), as well as other end-of-life decisions such as Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) orders and Living Wills, including decisions involving patients diagnosed with mental illnesses. A survey of 361 physicians in Lithuanian hospitals was conducted between October 2022 and July 2024, using hospital intranets and on-site distribution to guarantee representative sample. The survey included demographic factors such as age, gender, religious beliefs, and professional experience. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.0 and R software. Chi-square tests, Fisher’s exact tests, and logistic regression models were made to determine relationships, with significance set at p < 0.05.ResultsThe analysis showed that 61.2% of physicians supported assisted suicide for terminally ill patients, while only 19.1% supported it for patients with drug-resistant mental illness. Similarly, 61.5% supported euthanasia for terminal illness. Age, religious beliefs, and professional experience were significant determinants of support, with younger and non-religious physicians more likely to endorse E/PAS. Additionally, 92.2% of respondents supported DNR orders with patient consent, though this dropped to 63.1% without patient consent.ConclusionsLithuanian physicians’ attitudes toward E/PAS and other end-of-life decisions are strongly influenced by ethical, religious, and professional considerations. Significantly lower acceptance for psychiatric patients indicates higher sensitivity regarding mental competency and the ethics of E/PAS in such cases. These findings provide important insights for policymakers and healthcare providers in crafting informed and ethical E/PAS guidelines.
format Article
id doaj-art-2741c1aa73b5430f8fa735450d28cb0d
institution Kabale University
issn 1664-0640
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychiatry
spelling doaj-art-2741c1aa73b5430f8fa735450d28cb0d2025-01-07T06:43:49ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychiatry1664-06402025-01-011510.3389/fpsyt.2024.15077901507790Demographic influences on Lithuanian physicians’ attitudes toward medical assistance in dying: a cross-sectional studyBenedikt Bachmetjev0Artur Airapetian1Marija Jakubauskienė2Rolandas Zablockis3Asta Čekanauskaitė4Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, LithuaniaFaculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, LithuaniaPublic Health Department, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, Vilnius University, Vilnius, LithuaniaClinic of Chest Diseases, Immunology and Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, LithuaniaThe Centre for Health Ethics, Law and History, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, Vilnius University, Vilnius, LithuaniaBackgroundThe topic of end-of-life decisions is important due to aging populations and the rising number of terminal illnesses like cancer. As more people experience suffering, the ethical, medical, and legal debates of these decisions become significant to healthcare policy. Understanding medical professionals’ attitudes is critical for shaping responsible practices and legislation surrounding end-of-life care.MethodsThis cross-sectional study explores the attitudes of Lithuanian physicians toward medical assistance in dying (MAID), including euthanasia and assisted suicide (E/PAS), as well as other end-of-life decisions such as Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) orders and Living Wills, including decisions involving patients diagnosed with mental illnesses. A survey of 361 physicians in Lithuanian hospitals was conducted between October 2022 and July 2024, using hospital intranets and on-site distribution to guarantee representative sample. The survey included demographic factors such as age, gender, religious beliefs, and professional experience. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.0 and R software. Chi-square tests, Fisher’s exact tests, and logistic regression models were made to determine relationships, with significance set at p < 0.05.ResultsThe analysis showed that 61.2% of physicians supported assisted suicide for terminally ill patients, while only 19.1% supported it for patients with drug-resistant mental illness. Similarly, 61.5% supported euthanasia for terminal illness. Age, religious beliefs, and professional experience were significant determinants of support, with younger and non-religious physicians more likely to endorse E/PAS. Additionally, 92.2% of respondents supported DNR orders with patient consent, though this dropped to 63.1% without patient consent.ConclusionsLithuanian physicians’ attitudes toward E/PAS and other end-of-life decisions are strongly influenced by ethical, religious, and professional considerations. Significantly lower acceptance for psychiatric patients indicates higher sensitivity regarding mental competency and the ethics of E/PAS in such cases. These findings provide important insights for policymakers and healthcare providers in crafting informed and ethical E/PAS guidelines.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1507790/fulleuthanasiaassisted suicideend-of-life decisionsmedical assistance in dying (MAID)Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) ordersliving wills
spellingShingle Benedikt Bachmetjev
Artur Airapetian
Marija Jakubauskienė
Rolandas Zablockis
Asta Čekanauskaitė
Demographic influences on Lithuanian physicians’ attitudes toward medical assistance in dying: a cross-sectional study
Frontiers in Psychiatry
euthanasia
assisted suicide
end-of-life decisions
medical assistance in dying (MAID)
Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) orders
living wills
title Demographic influences on Lithuanian physicians’ attitudes toward medical assistance in dying: a cross-sectional study
title_full Demographic influences on Lithuanian physicians’ attitudes toward medical assistance in dying: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Demographic influences on Lithuanian physicians’ attitudes toward medical assistance in dying: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Demographic influences on Lithuanian physicians’ attitudes toward medical assistance in dying: a cross-sectional study
title_short Demographic influences on Lithuanian physicians’ attitudes toward medical assistance in dying: a cross-sectional study
title_sort demographic influences on lithuanian physicians attitudes toward medical assistance in dying a cross sectional study
topic euthanasia
assisted suicide
end-of-life decisions
medical assistance in dying (MAID)
Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) orders
living wills
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1507790/full
work_keys_str_mv AT benediktbachmetjev demographicinfluencesonlithuanianphysiciansattitudestowardmedicalassistanceindyingacrosssectionalstudy
AT arturairapetian demographicinfluencesonlithuanianphysiciansattitudestowardmedicalassistanceindyingacrosssectionalstudy
AT marijajakubauskiene demographicinfluencesonlithuanianphysiciansattitudestowardmedicalassistanceindyingacrosssectionalstudy
AT rolandaszablockis demographicinfluencesonlithuanianphysiciansattitudestowardmedicalassistanceindyingacrosssectionalstudy
AT astacekanauskaite demographicinfluencesonlithuanianphysiciansattitudestowardmedicalassistanceindyingacrosssectionalstudy