No significant links between somatognosia, stereognosia, and hypermobility: sensory processing unlikely to drive common complaints in hypermobile population

Abstract Background Previous research has demonstrated impaired proprioception and poorer responses to tactile deep pressure, visual-tactile integration, and vestibular stimuli in individuals with generalized hypermobility, potentially leading to sensory processing issues. Therefore, we aimed to exp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ivana Hanzlíková, Aneta Ruská, Kristýna Jančíková, Kim Hébert-Losier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-04-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08307-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849733500926689280
author Ivana Hanzlíková
Aneta Ruská
Kristýna Jančíková
Kim Hébert-Losier
author_facet Ivana Hanzlíková
Aneta Ruská
Kristýna Jančíková
Kim Hébert-Losier
author_sort Ivana Hanzlíková
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Previous research has demonstrated impaired proprioception and poorer responses to tactile deep pressure, visual-tactile integration, and vestibular stimuli in individuals with generalized hypermobility, potentially leading to sensory processing issues. Therefore, we aimed to explore the influence of hypermobility on somatognosia and stereognosia. Methods Forty-six participants were assessed using the Beighton score and categorized into three groups: non-hypermobile (n = 20), symptomatic hypermobile (n = 13), and asymptomatic hypermobile (n = 13). Somatognosia was evaluated using the shoulder width test in the vertical plane and pelvic width test in the vertical and horizontal planes. Stereognosia was assessed with Petrie’s test. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was examined the relationship between the Beighton score and measures of somatognosia and stereognosia. An unpaired t-test was used to compare variables between hypermobile (both symptomatic and asymptomatic) and non-hypermobile individuals, while a one-way ANOVA was used to compare data between the three groups. Results No significant relationship was observed between Beighton scores and measures of somatognosia and stereognosia. The t-test revealed no statistically significant differences between hypermobile and non-hypermobile groups in the shoulder width, two pelvic widths, and Petrie’s tests (all p ≥ 0.105). Similarly, one-way ANOVA showed no statistically significant differences between the three groups across these tests (all p ≥ 0.177). Conclusions The results indicate that somatognosia and stereognosia are not significantly related to the Beighton score and do not significantly differ between the groups studied. These sensory processing functions are unlikely to contribute to the common complaints reported by hypermobile individuals. Clinical trial number Not applicable.
format Article
id doaj-art-2573e8b5a10b4f7295c31a919b47b15d
institution DOAJ
issn 1471-2474
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
spelling doaj-art-2573e8b5a10b4f7295c31a919b47b15d2025-08-20T03:08:01ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742025-04-012611910.1186/s12891-025-08307-6No significant links between somatognosia, stereognosia, and hypermobility: sensory processing unlikely to drive common complaints in hypermobile populationIvana Hanzlíková0Aneta Ruská1Kristýna Jančíková2Kim Hébert-Losier3Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University OlomoucDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University OlomoucDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University OlomoucDivision of Health, Engineering, Computing and Science, Te Huataki Waiora School of Health, University of Waikato, Adams Centre for High PerformanceAbstract Background Previous research has demonstrated impaired proprioception and poorer responses to tactile deep pressure, visual-tactile integration, and vestibular stimuli in individuals with generalized hypermobility, potentially leading to sensory processing issues. Therefore, we aimed to explore the influence of hypermobility on somatognosia and stereognosia. Methods Forty-six participants were assessed using the Beighton score and categorized into three groups: non-hypermobile (n = 20), symptomatic hypermobile (n = 13), and asymptomatic hypermobile (n = 13). Somatognosia was evaluated using the shoulder width test in the vertical plane and pelvic width test in the vertical and horizontal planes. Stereognosia was assessed with Petrie’s test. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was examined the relationship between the Beighton score and measures of somatognosia and stereognosia. An unpaired t-test was used to compare variables between hypermobile (both symptomatic and asymptomatic) and non-hypermobile individuals, while a one-way ANOVA was used to compare data between the three groups. Results No significant relationship was observed between Beighton scores and measures of somatognosia and stereognosia. The t-test revealed no statistically significant differences between hypermobile and non-hypermobile groups in the shoulder width, two pelvic widths, and Petrie’s tests (all p ≥ 0.105). Similarly, one-way ANOVA showed no statistically significant differences between the three groups across these tests (all p ≥ 0.177). Conclusions The results indicate that somatognosia and stereognosia are not significantly related to the Beighton score and do not significantly differ between the groups studied. These sensory processing functions are unlikely to contribute to the common complaints reported by hypermobile individuals. Clinical trial number Not applicable.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08307-6Beighton scoreAsymptomatic hypermobilitySymptomatic hypermobilityPetrie testSensory processing
spellingShingle Ivana Hanzlíková
Aneta Ruská
Kristýna Jančíková
Kim Hébert-Losier
No significant links between somatognosia, stereognosia, and hypermobility: sensory processing unlikely to drive common complaints in hypermobile population
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Beighton score
Asymptomatic hypermobility
Symptomatic hypermobility
Petrie test
Sensory processing
title No significant links between somatognosia, stereognosia, and hypermobility: sensory processing unlikely to drive common complaints in hypermobile population
title_full No significant links between somatognosia, stereognosia, and hypermobility: sensory processing unlikely to drive common complaints in hypermobile population
title_fullStr No significant links between somatognosia, stereognosia, and hypermobility: sensory processing unlikely to drive common complaints in hypermobile population
title_full_unstemmed No significant links between somatognosia, stereognosia, and hypermobility: sensory processing unlikely to drive common complaints in hypermobile population
title_short No significant links between somatognosia, stereognosia, and hypermobility: sensory processing unlikely to drive common complaints in hypermobile population
title_sort no significant links between somatognosia stereognosia and hypermobility sensory processing unlikely to drive common complaints in hypermobile population
topic Beighton score
Asymptomatic hypermobility
Symptomatic hypermobility
Petrie test
Sensory processing
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08307-6
work_keys_str_mv AT ivanahanzlikova nosignificantlinksbetweensomatognosiastereognosiaandhypermobilitysensoryprocessingunlikelytodrivecommoncomplaintsinhypermobilepopulation
AT anetaruska nosignificantlinksbetweensomatognosiastereognosiaandhypermobilitysensoryprocessingunlikelytodrivecommoncomplaintsinhypermobilepopulation
AT kristynajancikova nosignificantlinksbetweensomatognosiastereognosiaandhypermobilitysensoryprocessingunlikelytodrivecommoncomplaintsinhypermobilepopulation
AT kimhebertlosier nosignificantlinksbetweensomatognosiastereognosiaandhypermobilitysensoryprocessingunlikelytodrivecommoncomplaintsinhypermobilepopulation