The hidden power of provincial and territorial immigration programs in shaping Canada’s immigration landscape

Abstract The Canadian immigration system is unique in that subnational governments play a significant role in selecting immigrants through Provincial Nominee Programs (PNPs), which empower nine provinces and two territories to actively select (“nominate”) economic immigrants. Collectively, PNPs have...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Catherine Xhardez, Danoé Tanguay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2024-12-01
Series:Comparative Migration Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-024-00414-y
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841559792137535488
author Catherine Xhardez
Danoé Tanguay
author_facet Catherine Xhardez
Danoé Tanguay
author_sort Catherine Xhardez
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The Canadian immigration system is unique in that subnational governments play a significant role in selecting immigrants through Provincial Nominee Programs (PNPs), which empower nine provinces and two territories to actively select (“nominate”) economic immigrants. Collectively, PNPs have become the country’s largest economic immigration program, but they are also the least studied, leading to a lack of understanding, transparency, and accountability. Using a subnational comparative method, this study examines 78 active subnational immigration programs (policy outputs), investigating policy design, requirements, and distribution of nominations in 2021–2022. We assess whether PNPs contribute to broader changes in the Canadian immigration regime. First, our analysis reveals the prevalence of employment-based streams and prearranged work as a selection criterion. Second, we show nuanced policy outputs in the progression toward a two-step system, with provincial variation in requirements for prior Canadian experience. Third, while PNPs are open to low-skilled workers, programs tailored exclusively to this group remain relatively limited. This comparative analysis reveals significant inter-provincial variation, and highlights the importance of a “disaggregated” evaluation of the migration state at the subnational level.
format Article
id doaj-art-2573a82ef73e46cebe18c8ee3872b0a0
institution Kabale University
issn 2214-594X
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Comparative Migration Studies
spelling doaj-art-2573a82ef73e46cebe18c8ee3872b0a02025-01-05T12:11:23ZengSpringerOpenComparative Migration Studies2214-594X2024-12-0112112110.1186/s40878-024-00414-yThe hidden power of provincial and territorial immigration programs in shaping Canada’s immigration landscapeCatherine Xhardez0Danoé Tanguay1Department of Political Science, Université de MontréalLaw Faculty, Université de MontréalAbstract The Canadian immigration system is unique in that subnational governments play a significant role in selecting immigrants through Provincial Nominee Programs (PNPs), which empower nine provinces and two territories to actively select (“nominate”) economic immigrants. Collectively, PNPs have become the country’s largest economic immigration program, but they are also the least studied, leading to a lack of understanding, transparency, and accountability. Using a subnational comparative method, this study examines 78 active subnational immigration programs (policy outputs), investigating policy design, requirements, and distribution of nominations in 2021–2022. We assess whether PNPs contribute to broader changes in the Canadian immigration regime. First, our analysis reveals the prevalence of employment-based streams and prearranged work as a selection criterion. Second, we show nuanced policy outputs in the progression toward a two-step system, with provincial variation in requirements for prior Canadian experience. Third, while PNPs are open to low-skilled workers, programs tailored exclusively to this group remain relatively limited. This comparative analysis reveals significant inter-provincial variation, and highlights the importance of a “disaggregated” evaluation of the migration state at the subnational level.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-024-00414-ySelectionEconomic immigrantsSubnationalImmigration policyProvincial Nominee Program (PNP)Canada
spellingShingle Catherine Xhardez
Danoé Tanguay
The hidden power of provincial and territorial immigration programs in shaping Canada’s immigration landscape
Comparative Migration Studies
Selection
Economic immigrants
Subnational
Immigration policy
Provincial Nominee Program (PNP)
Canada
title The hidden power of provincial and territorial immigration programs in shaping Canada’s immigration landscape
title_full The hidden power of provincial and territorial immigration programs in shaping Canada’s immigration landscape
title_fullStr The hidden power of provincial and territorial immigration programs in shaping Canada’s immigration landscape
title_full_unstemmed The hidden power of provincial and territorial immigration programs in shaping Canada’s immigration landscape
title_short The hidden power of provincial and territorial immigration programs in shaping Canada’s immigration landscape
title_sort hidden power of provincial and territorial immigration programs in shaping canada s immigration landscape
topic Selection
Economic immigrants
Subnational
Immigration policy
Provincial Nominee Program (PNP)
Canada
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-024-00414-y
work_keys_str_mv AT catherinexhardez thehiddenpowerofprovincialandterritorialimmigrationprogramsinshapingcanadasimmigrationlandscape
AT danoetanguay thehiddenpowerofprovincialandterritorialimmigrationprogramsinshapingcanadasimmigrationlandscape
AT catherinexhardez hiddenpowerofprovincialandterritorialimmigrationprogramsinshapingcanadasimmigrationlandscape
AT danoetanguay hiddenpowerofprovincialandterritorialimmigrationprogramsinshapingcanadasimmigrationlandscape