Plastic policy hypocrisies: evaluating the efficacy of bans and alternatives in the Eastern Caribbean
This study critically examines the socio-economic impacts and practical challenges of implementing plastic policies and regulations such as bans in Caribbean small island developing states (SIDS), within the broader context of global environmental efforts. By employing a mixed-methods approach, the...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Sustainability |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frsus.2024.1439958/full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846129518903820288 |
|---|---|
| author | Roxanne E. D. Graham |
| author_facet | Roxanne E. D. Graham |
| author_sort | Roxanne E. D. Graham |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study critically examines the socio-economic impacts and practical challenges of implementing plastic policies and regulations such as bans in Caribbean small island developing states (SIDS), within the broader context of global environmental efforts. By employing a mixed-methods approach, the research uses qualitative data from expert interviews from the Windward Islands in the south-east of the Caribbean, and on the ground observations and documentation of plastic and alternative usage in the island of Grenada. The findings highlight a significant “plastic policy hypocrisy,” where bans on single-use plastics exist alongside a heavy reliance on imported goods predominantly packaged in plastic. This contradiction points to a broader issue in environmental policymaking, where surface-level solutions like bans are employed without addressing underlying systemic challenges, such as inadequate recycling infrastructure or lack of export opportunities for recyclable materials. The research highlights how these policies, though well-intentioned, may fall short in practicality and global alignment. The study highlights the need for holistic, globally informed, and context-sensitive approaches to marine environmental related policies in Caribbean SIDS. Emphasizing the integration of ecological, economic, and cultural dimensions, it advocates for regional and international collaboration to enhance marine litter specifically plastic policy development and technical expertise. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-24fdbd85439c40fda9e74ad7fde9f6d8 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2673-4524 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Sustainability |
| spelling | doaj-art-24fdbd85439c40fda9e74ad7fde9f6d82024-12-10T04:23:31ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Sustainability2673-45242024-12-01510.3389/frsus.2024.14399581439958Plastic policy hypocrisies: evaluating the efficacy of bans and alternatives in the Eastern CaribbeanRoxanne E. D. GrahamThis study critically examines the socio-economic impacts and practical challenges of implementing plastic policies and regulations such as bans in Caribbean small island developing states (SIDS), within the broader context of global environmental efforts. By employing a mixed-methods approach, the research uses qualitative data from expert interviews from the Windward Islands in the south-east of the Caribbean, and on the ground observations and documentation of plastic and alternative usage in the island of Grenada. The findings highlight a significant “plastic policy hypocrisy,” where bans on single-use plastics exist alongside a heavy reliance on imported goods predominantly packaged in plastic. This contradiction points to a broader issue in environmental policymaking, where surface-level solutions like bans are employed without addressing underlying systemic challenges, such as inadequate recycling infrastructure or lack of export opportunities for recyclable materials. The research highlights how these policies, though well-intentioned, may fall short in practicality and global alignment. The study highlights the need for holistic, globally informed, and context-sensitive approaches to marine environmental related policies in Caribbean SIDS. Emphasizing the integration of ecological, economic, and cultural dimensions, it advocates for regional and international collaboration to enhance marine litter specifically plastic policy development and technical expertise.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frsus.2024.1439958/fullmarine plastic pollutionplastic policy hypocrisymarine litterwaste managementCaribbean SIDSplastic bans |
| spellingShingle | Roxanne E. D. Graham Plastic policy hypocrisies: evaluating the efficacy of bans and alternatives in the Eastern Caribbean Frontiers in Sustainability marine plastic pollution plastic policy hypocrisy marine litter waste management Caribbean SIDS plastic bans |
| title | Plastic policy hypocrisies: evaluating the efficacy of bans and alternatives in the Eastern Caribbean |
| title_full | Plastic policy hypocrisies: evaluating the efficacy of bans and alternatives in the Eastern Caribbean |
| title_fullStr | Plastic policy hypocrisies: evaluating the efficacy of bans and alternatives in the Eastern Caribbean |
| title_full_unstemmed | Plastic policy hypocrisies: evaluating the efficacy of bans and alternatives in the Eastern Caribbean |
| title_short | Plastic policy hypocrisies: evaluating the efficacy of bans and alternatives in the Eastern Caribbean |
| title_sort | plastic policy hypocrisies evaluating the efficacy of bans and alternatives in the eastern caribbean |
| topic | marine plastic pollution plastic policy hypocrisy marine litter waste management Caribbean SIDS plastic bans |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frsus.2024.1439958/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT roxanneedgraham plasticpolicyhypocrisiesevaluatingtheefficacyofbansandalternativesintheeasterncaribbean |