Feedback of individual genetic and genomics research results: A qualitative study involving grassroots communities in Uganda.
<h4>Background</h4>Genetics and genomics research (GGR) is associated with several challenges including, but not limited to, methods and implications of sharing research findings with participants and their family members, issues of confidentiality, and ownership of data obtained from sa...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0267375&type=printable |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846161732791173120 |
|---|---|
| author | Joseph Ochieng Betty Kwagala John Barugahare Marlo Möller Keymanthri Moodley |
| author_facet | Joseph Ochieng Betty Kwagala John Barugahare Marlo Möller Keymanthri Moodley |
| author_sort | Joseph Ochieng |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <h4>Background</h4>Genetics and genomics research (GGR) is associated with several challenges including, but not limited to, methods and implications of sharing research findings with participants and their family members, issues of confidentiality, and ownership of data obtained from samples. Additionally, GGR holds significant potential risk for social and psychological harms. Considerable research has been conducted globally, and has advanced the debate on return of genetic and genomics testing results. However, such investigations are limited in the African setting, including Uganda where research ethics guidance on return of results is deficient or suboptimal at best. The objective of this study was to assess perceptions of grassroots communities on if and how feedback of individual genetics and genomics testing results should occur in Uganda with a view to improving ethics guidance.<h4>Methods</h4>This was a cross-sectional study that employed a qualitative exploratory approach. Five deliberative focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with 42 participants from grassroots communities representing three major ethnic groupings. These were rural settings and the majority of participants were subsistence farmers with limited or no exposure to GGR. Data were analysed through thematic analysis, with both deductive and inductive approaches applied to interrogate predetermined themes and to identify any emerging themes. NVivo software (QSR international 2020) was used to support data analysis and illustrative quotes were extracted.<h4>Results</h4>All the respondents were willing to participate in GGR and receive feedback of results conditional upon a health benefit. The main motivation was diagnostic and therapeutic benefits as well as facilitating future health planning. Thematic analysis identified four themes and several sub-themes including 1) the need-to-know health status 2) paternity information as a benefit and risk; 3) ethical considerations for feedback of findings and 4) extending feedback of genetics findings to family and community.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Participation in hypothetical GGR as well as feedback of results is acceptable to individuals in grassroots communities. However, the strong therapeutic and/or diagnostic misconception linked to GGR is concerning given that hopes for therapeutic and/or diagnostic benefit are unfounded. Viewing GGR as an opportunity to confirm or dispute paternity was another interesting perception. These findings carry profound implications for consent processes, genetic counselling and research ethics guidance. Privacy and confidentiality, benefits, risks as well as implications for sharing need to be considered for such feedback of results to be conducted appropriately. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-24f9eaf2221a4d0cb2c788444611a980 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj-art-24f9eaf2221a4d0cb2c788444611a9802024-11-21T05:31:04ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-011711e026737510.1371/journal.pone.0267375Feedback of individual genetic and genomics research results: A qualitative study involving grassroots communities in Uganda.Joseph OchiengBetty KwagalaJohn BarugahareMarlo MöllerKeymanthri Moodley<h4>Background</h4>Genetics and genomics research (GGR) is associated with several challenges including, but not limited to, methods and implications of sharing research findings with participants and their family members, issues of confidentiality, and ownership of data obtained from samples. Additionally, GGR holds significant potential risk for social and psychological harms. Considerable research has been conducted globally, and has advanced the debate on return of genetic and genomics testing results. However, such investigations are limited in the African setting, including Uganda where research ethics guidance on return of results is deficient or suboptimal at best. The objective of this study was to assess perceptions of grassroots communities on if and how feedback of individual genetics and genomics testing results should occur in Uganda with a view to improving ethics guidance.<h4>Methods</h4>This was a cross-sectional study that employed a qualitative exploratory approach. Five deliberative focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with 42 participants from grassroots communities representing three major ethnic groupings. These were rural settings and the majority of participants were subsistence farmers with limited or no exposure to GGR. Data were analysed through thematic analysis, with both deductive and inductive approaches applied to interrogate predetermined themes and to identify any emerging themes. NVivo software (QSR international 2020) was used to support data analysis and illustrative quotes were extracted.<h4>Results</h4>All the respondents were willing to participate in GGR and receive feedback of results conditional upon a health benefit. The main motivation was diagnostic and therapeutic benefits as well as facilitating future health planning. Thematic analysis identified four themes and several sub-themes including 1) the need-to-know health status 2) paternity information as a benefit and risk; 3) ethical considerations for feedback of findings and 4) extending feedback of genetics findings to family and community.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Participation in hypothetical GGR as well as feedback of results is acceptable to individuals in grassroots communities. However, the strong therapeutic and/or diagnostic misconception linked to GGR is concerning given that hopes for therapeutic and/or diagnostic benefit are unfounded. Viewing GGR as an opportunity to confirm or dispute paternity was another interesting perception. These findings carry profound implications for consent processes, genetic counselling and research ethics guidance. Privacy and confidentiality, benefits, risks as well as implications for sharing need to be considered for such feedback of results to be conducted appropriately.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0267375&type=printable |
| spellingShingle | Joseph Ochieng Betty Kwagala John Barugahare Marlo Möller Keymanthri Moodley Feedback of individual genetic and genomics research results: A qualitative study involving grassroots communities in Uganda. PLoS ONE |
| title | Feedback of individual genetic and genomics research results: A qualitative study involving grassroots communities in Uganda. |
| title_full | Feedback of individual genetic and genomics research results: A qualitative study involving grassroots communities in Uganda. |
| title_fullStr | Feedback of individual genetic and genomics research results: A qualitative study involving grassroots communities in Uganda. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Feedback of individual genetic and genomics research results: A qualitative study involving grassroots communities in Uganda. |
| title_short | Feedback of individual genetic and genomics research results: A qualitative study involving grassroots communities in Uganda. |
| title_sort | feedback of individual genetic and genomics research results a qualitative study involving grassroots communities in uganda |
| url | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0267375&type=printable |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT josephochieng feedbackofindividualgeneticandgenomicsresearchresultsaqualitativestudyinvolvinggrassrootscommunitiesinuganda AT bettykwagala feedbackofindividualgeneticandgenomicsresearchresultsaqualitativestudyinvolvinggrassrootscommunitiesinuganda AT johnbarugahare feedbackofindividualgeneticandgenomicsresearchresultsaqualitativestudyinvolvinggrassrootscommunitiesinuganda AT marlomoller feedbackofindividualgeneticandgenomicsresearchresultsaqualitativestudyinvolvinggrassrootscommunitiesinuganda AT keymanthrimoodley feedbackofindividualgeneticandgenomicsresearchresultsaqualitativestudyinvolvinggrassrootscommunitiesinuganda |