Comparison of nerve conduction techniques in 95 mild carpal tunnel syndrome hands Síndrome do túnel do carpo leve: comparação de técnicas de condução nervosa em 95 mãos
Electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) were prospectively studied in 95 hands. The following techniques were studied in all hands and when at least one abnormal value was found (onset-measured), it was included on results: 1. wrist-index finger latency (WIF), abnormal > or = 2.8 ms, 140...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Thieme Revinter Publicações
1999-06-01
|
| Series: | Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X1999000200005 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) were prospectively studied in 95 hands. The following techniques were studied in all hands and when at least one abnormal value was found (onset-measured), it was included on results: 1. wrist-index finger latency (WIF), abnormal > or = 2.8 ms, 140 mm; 2. palm-wrist latency (PW), abnormal > or = 1.8 ms, 80 mm; 3. comparison median/ulnar palm-wrist latency (CPW), abnormal > or = 0.4 ms; 4. comparison median/ulnar latency, wrist-ring finger (CMU), abnormal > or = 0.5 ms, 140 mm; 5. comparison median/radial latency, wrist-thumb (CMR), abnormal > or = 0.4 ms, 100 mm. All 95 CTS hands selected have the WIF <= 3.5 ms (mild CTS). We found the CMR (97.8%) technique the most sensitive for mild CTS electrodiagnosis and the only comparative method with all potentials recordable when compared to CPW (88.4%), PW (84.2%), CMU (72.6%) and WIF (68.4%).<br>Eletrodiagnóstico da síndrome do túnel do carpo (STC) foi estudado prospectivamente em 95 mãos sintomáticas. As técnicas estudadas foram realizadas em todas mãos com latência medida no ínicio dos potenciais e pelo menos uma delas estava anormal dentro dos limites descritos: 1. Latência punho- II dedo (PD), anormal > ou = 2,8 ms, 140 mm; 2. Latência palma-punho (PP), anormal > ou = 1,8 ms, 80 mm; 3. Comparação de latência palma-punho mediano-ulnar (CP), anormal > ou = 0,4 ms, 80 mm; 4. Comparação de latência mediano-ulnar, punho- IV dedo (CMU), anormal > ou = 0,5 ms, 140 mm; 5. Comparação de latência mediano-radial, punho- I dedo (CMR), anormal > ou = 0,4 ms, 100 mm. Todas 95 mãos selecionadas tiveram PD <= 3,5 ms (STC leve). Concluiu-se que a CMR foi a técnica mais sensível para STC leve (97,8%) e o único método comparativo com todos potenciais de ação obtidos; seguiram-se CP (88,4%), PP (84,2%), CMU (72,6%) e PD (68,4%). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0004-282X 1678-4227 |