Estimation of the nutrient variation in feed delivery and effects on lactating dairy cattle
Diets formulated for dairy cattle are designed to supply nutrients, but rations delivered to the animal may deviate from original formulations, resulting in implications for milk production, composition, and even pregnancy rate. The objective of this study was to evaluate retrospective feed mixing r...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2024-11-01
|
| Series: | JDS Communications |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224000760 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846160308303822848 |
|---|---|
| author | A.L. Carroll K.J. Hanford C. Abney-Schulte P.J. Kononoff |
| author_facet | A.L. Carroll K.J. Hanford C. Abney-Schulte P.J. Kononoff |
| author_sort | A.L. Carroll |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Diets formulated for dairy cattle are designed to supply nutrients, but rations delivered to the animal may deviate from original formulations, resulting in implications for milk production, composition, and even pregnancy rate. The objective of this study was to evaluate retrospective feed mixing records collected from 8 commercial dairy farms over 52 wk. Farms ranged from 2,982 to 29,783 animals, producing 31.8 ± 5.93 (±SD) kg of milk with 4.14 ± 0.461% fat and 3.26 ± 0.218% protein. Data collected included daily TMR nutrient deviation, calculated as diet nutrient content minus the observed divided by the formulated diet concentrations of CP, fat, NDF, and starch. Data were analyzed with fixed effects of time (modeled as 28-d periods) and days of positive nutrient deviation in fat, CP, NDF, and starch with each nutrient alone and in combination with the other nutrients, random effects of herd, and repeated measure of time within herd. The nutrient deviation by farm averaged (±SD) 1.68 ± 2.655, 2.28 ± 4.473, 1.75 ± 2.621, and 1.47 ± 2.147% for CP, fat, NDF, and starch, respectively. Days of positive nutrient deviation per period averaged (±SD) 25.5 ± 3.47, 25.5 ± 3.72, 25.6 ± 3.49, and 25.9 ± 2.61, respectively. Dry matter intake (DMI; 17.2 ± 1.78 kg/d) decreased with increasing positive deviation days in starch (−0.0483 ± 0.01265) and increased with increasing positive deviation days in CP (0.0211 ± 0.00942). Milk yield (31.4 ± 2.50 kg/d) increased with positive deviation days in starch (0.0486 ± 0.02110) and decreased with increased positive deviation days in NDF (−0.0298 ± 0.02202). Finally, pregnancy rate (21.7 ± 4.34) increased with increasing positive deviation days in fat (0.385 ± 0.1635) and decreased with increasing positive deviation days in CP (−0.420 ± 0.1879). For these models, period significantly affected milk yield but was not observed to affect pregnancy rate and DMI. Results suggest farm and nutrient type were significant sources of variation, and overall, farms overfeed nutrients CP, fat, NDF, and starch 92% of the days of a 28-d period. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-2218ccc479044dbba086bc1014800a7f |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2666-9102 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-11-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | JDS Communications |
| spelling | doaj-art-2218ccc479044dbba086bc1014800a7f2024-11-22T07:39:18ZengElsevierJDS Communications2666-91022024-11-0156548552Estimation of the nutrient variation in feed delivery and effects on lactating dairy cattleA.L. Carroll0K.J. Hanford1C. Abney-Schulte2P.J. Kononoff3Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583Department of Statistics, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68503Cargill, Minneapolis, MN 55440Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583; Corresponding authorDiets formulated for dairy cattle are designed to supply nutrients, but rations delivered to the animal may deviate from original formulations, resulting in implications for milk production, composition, and even pregnancy rate. The objective of this study was to evaluate retrospective feed mixing records collected from 8 commercial dairy farms over 52 wk. Farms ranged from 2,982 to 29,783 animals, producing 31.8 ± 5.93 (±SD) kg of milk with 4.14 ± 0.461% fat and 3.26 ± 0.218% protein. Data collected included daily TMR nutrient deviation, calculated as diet nutrient content minus the observed divided by the formulated diet concentrations of CP, fat, NDF, and starch. Data were analyzed with fixed effects of time (modeled as 28-d periods) and days of positive nutrient deviation in fat, CP, NDF, and starch with each nutrient alone and in combination with the other nutrients, random effects of herd, and repeated measure of time within herd. The nutrient deviation by farm averaged (±SD) 1.68 ± 2.655, 2.28 ± 4.473, 1.75 ± 2.621, and 1.47 ± 2.147% for CP, fat, NDF, and starch, respectively. Days of positive nutrient deviation per period averaged (±SD) 25.5 ± 3.47, 25.5 ± 3.72, 25.6 ± 3.49, and 25.9 ± 2.61, respectively. Dry matter intake (DMI; 17.2 ± 1.78 kg/d) decreased with increasing positive deviation days in starch (−0.0483 ± 0.01265) and increased with increasing positive deviation days in CP (0.0211 ± 0.00942). Milk yield (31.4 ± 2.50 kg/d) increased with positive deviation days in starch (0.0486 ± 0.02110) and decreased with increased positive deviation days in NDF (−0.0298 ± 0.02202). Finally, pregnancy rate (21.7 ± 4.34) increased with increasing positive deviation days in fat (0.385 ± 0.1635) and decreased with increasing positive deviation days in CP (−0.420 ± 0.1879). For these models, period significantly affected milk yield but was not observed to affect pregnancy rate and DMI. Results suggest farm and nutrient type were significant sources of variation, and overall, farms overfeed nutrients CP, fat, NDF, and starch 92% of the days of a 28-d period.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224000760 |
| spellingShingle | A.L. Carroll K.J. Hanford C. Abney-Schulte P.J. Kononoff Estimation of the nutrient variation in feed delivery and effects on lactating dairy cattle JDS Communications |
| title | Estimation of the nutrient variation in feed delivery and effects on lactating dairy cattle |
| title_full | Estimation of the nutrient variation in feed delivery and effects on lactating dairy cattle |
| title_fullStr | Estimation of the nutrient variation in feed delivery and effects on lactating dairy cattle |
| title_full_unstemmed | Estimation of the nutrient variation in feed delivery and effects on lactating dairy cattle |
| title_short | Estimation of the nutrient variation in feed delivery and effects on lactating dairy cattle |
| title_sort | estimation of the nutrient variation in feed delivery and effects on lactating dairy cattle |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224000760 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT alcarroll estimationofthenutrientvariationinfeeddeliveryandeffectsonlactatingdairycattle AT kjhanford estimationofthenutrientvariationinfeeddeliveryandeffectsonlactatingdairycattle AT cabneyschulte estimationofthenutrientvariationinfeeddeliveryandeffectsonlactatingdairycattle AT pjkononoff estimationofthenutrientvariationinfeeddeliveryandeffectsonlactatingdairycattle |